Dataset Information

The Role of Interleukin-4 and Interleukin-10 in Osteoarthritic Joint Disease: A Systematic Narrative Review.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

A fusion protein of interleukin-4 and interleukin-10 (IL4-10 FP) was developed as a disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD), and chondroprotection, anti-inflammation, and analgesia have been suggested. To better understand the mechanisms behind its potential as DMOAD, this systematic narrative review aims to assess the potential of IL-4, IL-10 and the combination of IL-4 and IL-10 for the treatment of osteoarthritis. It describes the chondroprotective, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic effects of IL-4, IL-10, and IL4-10 FP.

Design

PubMed and Embase were searched for publications that were published from 1990 until May 21, 2021 (moment of search). Key search terms were: Osteoarthritis, Interleukin-4, and Interleukin-10. This yielded 2,479 hits, of which 43 were included in this review.

Results

IL-4 and IL-10 showed mainly protective effects on osteoarthritic cartilage in vitro and in vivo, as did IL4-10 FP. Both cytokines showed anti-inflammatory effects, but also proinflammatory effects. Only in vitro IL4-10 FP showed purely anti-inflammatory effects, indicating that proinflammatory effects of one cytokine can be counteracted by the other when given as a combination. Only a few studies investigated the analgesic effects of IL-4, IL-10 or IL4-10 FP. In vitro, IL-4 and IL4-10 FP were able to decrease pain mediators. In vivo, IL-4, IL-10, and IL4-10 FP were able to reduce pain.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this review describes overlapping, but also different modes of action for the DMOAD effects of IL-4 and IL-10, giving an explanation for the synergistic effects found when applied as combination, as is the case for IL4-10 FP.

SUBMITTER: van Helvoort EM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9251827 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common causes of disability in aged people, and it is defined as a degenerative arthropathy, characterized by the disruption in joint tissue. The synovium plays a vital role in maintaining the health of the joint by supplying the nutrients to the surrounding tissues and the lubrication for joint movement. While it is well known that all the joint tissues are communicating and working together to provide a functioning joint, most studies on OA have been focused on bone and cartilage but much less about synovium have been reported. The purpose of this review was to investigate the current literature focused on RNA sequencing (RNAseq) of osteoarthritic synovial tissues to further understand the dynamic transcriptome changes occurring in this pivotal joint tissue. A total of 3 electronic databases (PubMed, CINHAL Complete, and Academic Complete) were systematically searched following PRISMA guidelines. The following criteria was used for inclusion: English language, free full text, between the period 2011-2022, size of sample (n > 10), study design being either retrospective or prospective, and RNAseq data of synovial tissue from OA subjects. From the initial search, 174 articles, 5 met all of our criteria and were selected for this review. The RNAseq analysis revealed several differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in synovial tissue. These genes are related to the inflammatory pathway and regulation of the extracellular matrix. The MMP family, particularly MMP13 was identified by three of the studies, indicating its important role in OA. IL6, a key contributor in the inflammation pathway, was also identified in 3 studies. There was a total of 8 DEGs, MMP13, MMP1, MMP2, APOD, IL6, TNFAIP6, FCER1G, and IGF1 that overlapped in 4 out of the 5 studies. One study focused on microbial RNA in the synovial tissue found that the microbes were differentially expressed in OA subjects too. These differentially expressed microbes have also been linked to the inflammatory pathway. Further investigation with more clinical gene profiling in synovial tissue of OA subjects is required to reveal the causation and progression, as well as aid in the development of new treatments.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Obesity is a leading comorbidity in psoriatic disease, including both psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and is associated with adverse metabolic and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. Anthropometric parameters, such as weight, body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio, have been extensively reported in psoriatic disease. However, the associations of body composition and fat distribution with psoriasis have not yet been fully defined. OBJECTIVES:To identify whether patients with psoriatic disease, including psoriatic arthritis, have altered body composition compared with the general population, and to review existing modalities for the assessment of body composition. METHODS:Electronic searches of the literature were conducted in PubMed, Medline (Ovid®), Embase (Ovid®), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Google Scholar. Titles and abstracts were reviewed by two authors independently against a set of prespecified inclusion/exclusion criteria. The research question was answered with a systematic literature review and results were summarized narratively. RESULTS:Twenty-five full text articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final narrative analysis. The studies were of heterogeneous design and used a range of objective measures to assess body composition, including simple anthropometric measures, bioimpedance analysis (BIA), dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and computed tomography (CT). Few studies met all the quality assessment criteria. Clinical heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with psoriatic disease reveal defined body composition changes that are independent of obesity and the customary metabolic syndrome, including higher overall body fat, visceral fat and sarcopenia. These findings emphasize that patients with psoriatic disease should be screened for abnormal adipose effects beyond their weight and body mass index (BMI). Our findings show that the last decade has seen an exciting expansion of research interest in the development and validation of new modalities for the assessment of body composition. There is no consensus on the optimal assessment method of body composition for this diverse group; hence there is a need for validation of existing modalities and standardization of assessment tools.