Dataset Information

Precision medicine-based therapies in advanced colorectal cancer: The University of California San Diego Molecular Tumor Board experience.

ABSTRACT: Treatment for advanced colorectal cancer is often limited by complex molecular profiles, which promote resistance to systemic agents and targeted monotherapies. Recent studies suggest that a personalized, combinatorial approach of matching drugs to tumor alterations may be more effective. We implemented a precision medicine strategy by forming a Molecular Tumor Board (MTB), a multidisciplinary team of clinicians, scientists, bioinformaticians and geneticists. The MTB integrated molecular profiling information and patient characteristics to develop N-of-One treatments for 51 patients with advanced colorectal cancer. All patients had metastatic disease and 63% had received ≥ 3 prior therapy lines. Overall, 34/51 patients (67%) were matched to ≥ 1 drug recommended by the MTB based on individual tumor characteristics, whereas 17/51 (33%) patients received unmatched therapies. Patients who received matched therapy demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.81; P = 0.01) and a trend towards higher clinical benefit rates (41% vs. 18%, P = 0.058) (all multivariate) compared to patients receiving unmatched therapy. The MTB facilitated personalized matching of drugs to tumor characteristics, which was associated with improved progression-free survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

SUBMITTER: Louie BH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9251876 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Patients with rare tumors may lack approved treatments and clinical trial access. Although each rare tumor is uncommon, cumulatively they account for approximately 25% of cancers. We recently initiated a Rare Tumor Clinic that emphasized a precision medicine strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We investigated the first 40 patients presenting at the Rare Tumor Clinic. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tissue and plasma-derived, circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA), and protein markers were assessed. RESULTS:Median age was 58 years (range, 31-78 years); 70% (28/40) were women; median number of previous systemic therapies was 2 (range 0-7). The most common diagnoses were sarcoma (n?=?7) for solid tumors and Erdheim-Chester disease (n?=?5) for hematologic malignancies. Twenty distinct diagnoses were seen. Examples of ultrarare tumors included ameloblastoma, yolk sac liver tumor, ampullary cancer, and Castleman's disease. Altogether, 32 of 33 patients (97%) with tissue NGS and 15 of 33 (45%) with ctDNA sequencing harbored ?1 alteration. Overall, 92.5% of patients (37/40) had ?1 actionable target based on either genomic (n?=?32) or protein (n?=?27) markers. In total, 52.5% (21/40) received matched therapy; 52.4% (11/21) achieved stable disease (SD) ?6 months (n?=?3), partial remission (PR; n?=?6), or complete remission (CR; n?=?2). Matched therapy resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival compared with last prior unmatched therapy (hazard ratio 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.10-0.71, p?=?.008). CONCLUSION:Identifying genomic and protein markers in patients with rare/ultrarare tumors was feasible. When therapies were matched, >50% of patients attained SD ?6 months, PR, or CR. Further precision medicine clinical investigations focusing on rare and ultrarare tumors are urgently needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:Although rare tumors are infrequent by definition, when all subtypes of rare cancers are combined, they account for approximately 25% of adult malignancies. However, patients with rare tumors may lack approved treatments and clinical trial access. This paper describes an institutional a Rare Tumor Clinic focused on a precision medicine strategy. Performing genomics and protein analyses was feasible amongst patients with rare cancers. Over 50% of patients attained SD ?6 months, PR, or CR when they received matched therapy (genomically targeted and/or immunotherapy). Further studies investigating the efficacy of the precision therapy approach among rare tumors are warranted.

Project description:BackgroundThe diversity in the genomic landscape of advanced and metastatic tumors calls for combination therapies based on the genomic signature associated with each tumor. Determining safe and tolerable doses for novel combinations of oncology drugs is essential for a precision medicine approach, but can also require dose reductions. Trametinib, palbociclib, and everolimus are among the targeted therapies most often used in novel combinations at our precision medicine clinic.ObjectiveTo evaluate the safe, tolerable dosing of trametinib, palbociclib, and everolimus when used as part of novel combinations with other agents for the treatment of advanced or metastatic solid tumors.MethodsThis retrospective study included adult patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors who received trametinib, everolimus, or palbociclib plus other therapies as a part of novel combinations between December 2011 and July 2018 at the University of California San Diego. Patients were excluded if they received trametinib, everolimus, or palbociclib in standard combinations, such as dabrafenib plus trametinib, everolimus plus fulvestrant, everolimus plus letrozole, and palbociclib plus letrozole. Dosing and adverse events were determined through a review of the electronic medical records. A safe, tolerable drug combination dose was defined as being tolerated for at least 1 month, with no clinically significant serious adverse events.ResultsA safe, tolerable dose was determined for 76% of the 71 patients who received trametinib, 88% of the 48 patients who received everolimus, and 73% of the 41 patients receiving palbociclib when used in combination with other therapies. For patients with clinically significant adverse events, dose reductions were attempted in 30% of the trametinib recipients, in 17% of everolimus recipients, and in 45% of palbociclib recipients. When used in combination with other therapies, the optimal dosing of trametinib, palbociclib, and everolimus was lower than the standard single-agent dosing: it was 1 mg daily for trametinib; 5 mg daily for everolimus; and 75 mg daily, for 3 weeks on and 1 week off for palbociclib. Of note, everolimus could not be given concomitantly with trametinib at these doses.ConclusionSafe and tolerable dosing of novel combination therapies that includes trametinib, everolimus, or palbociclib is feasible for a precision medicine approach. However, neither results from this study nor results from previous studies could support the use of everolimus in combination with trametinib, even at reduced doses.

Dataset Information

Precision medicine-based therapies in advanced colorectal cancer: The University of California San Diego Molecular Tumor Board experience.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets