Dataset Information

Investigation of technical quality of antenatal and perinatal services in a nationally representative sample of health facilities in Nepal.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Access to routine antenatal and perinatal services is improved in the last two decades in Nepal. However, gaps remain in coverage and quality of care delivered from the health facilities. This study investigated the delivery of technical quality antenatal and perinatal services from health facilities and their associated determinants in Nepal.

Methods

Data for this study were derived from the Nepal Health Facility Survey 2015. The World Health Organization's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment framework was adopted to assess the technical quality of antenatal and perinatal services of health facilities. Outcome variables included technical quality scores of i) 269 facilities providing antenatal services and ii) 109 facilities providing childbirth and postnatal care services (perinatal care). Technical quality scores of health facilities were estimated adapting recommended antenatal and perinatal interventions. Independent variables included locations and types of health facilities and their management functions (e.g., supervision). We conducted a linear regression analysis to identify the determinants of better technical quality of health services in health facilities. Beta coefficients were exponentiated into odds ratios (ORs) and reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The significance level was set at p-value < 0.05.

Results

The mean score of the technical quality of health facilities for each outcome variable (antenatal and perinatal services) was 0.55 (out of 1.00). Compared to province one, facilities of Madhesh province had 4% lower odds (adjusted OR = 0.96; 95%CI: 0.92, 0.99) of providing better quality antenatal services, while health facilities of Gandaki province had higher odds of providing better quality antenatal services (aOR = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.10). Private facilities had higher odds (aOR = 1.13; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.23) of providing better quality perinatal services compared to public facilities.

Conclusions

Private facilities provide better quality antenatal and perinatal health services than public facilities, while health facilities of Madhesh province provide poor quality perinatal services. Health system needs to implement tailored strategies, including recruiting health workers, supervision and onsite coaching and access to necessary equipment and medicine in the facilities of Madhesh province. Health system inputs (trained human resources, equipment and supplies) are needed in the public facilities. Extending the safe delivery incentive programme to the privately managed facilities could also improve access to better quality health services in Nepal.

SUBMITTER: Khatri RB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9252055 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Access to and utilisation of routine maternal and newborn health (MNH) services, such as antenatal care (ANC), and perinatal services, has increased over the last two decades in Nepal. The availability, delivery, and utilisation of quality health services during routine MNH visits can significantly impact the survival of mothers and newborns. Capacity of health facility is critical for the delivery of quality health services. However, little is known about health system readiness (structural quality) of health facilities for routine MNH services and associated determinants in Nepal. Data were derived from the Nepal Health Facility Survey (NHFS) 2015. Total of 901 health facilities were assessed for structural quality of ANC services, and 454 health facilities were assessed for perinatal services. Adapting the World Health Organization's Service Availability and Readiness Assessment manual, we estimated structural quality scores of health facilities for MNH services based on the availability and readiness of related subdomain-specific items. Several health facility-level characteristics were considered as independent variables. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, and the odds ratio (OR) was reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The significance level was set at p-value of <0.05. The mean score of the structural quality of health facilities for ANC, and perinatal services was 0.62, and 0.67, respectively. The average score for the availability of staff (e.g., training) and guidelines-related items in health facilities was the lowest (0.37) compared to other four subdomains. The odds of optimal structural quality of health facilities for ANC services were higher in private health facilities (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.48, 4.74), and health facilities supervised by higher authority (aOR = 1.96; CI: 1.22, 3.13) while peripheral health facilities had lower odds (aOR = 0.13; CI: 0.09, 0.18) compared to their reference groups. Private facilities were more likely (aOR = 1.69; CI:1.25, 3.40) to have optimal structural quality for perinatal services. Health facilities of Karnali (aOR = 0.29; CI: 0.09, 0.99) and peripheral areas had less likelihood (aOR = 0.16; CI: 0.10, 0.27) to have optimal structural quality for perinatal services. Provincial and local governments should focus on improving the health system readiness in peripheral and public facilities to deliver quality MNH services. Provision of trained staff and guidelines, and supply of laboratory equipment in health facilities could potentially equip facilities for optimal quality health services delivery. In addition, supervision of health staff and facilities and onsite coaching at peripheral areas from higher-level authorities could improve the health management functions and technical capacity for delivering quality MNH services. Local governments can prioritise inputs, including providing a trained workforce, supplying equipment for laboratory services, and essential medicine to improve the quality of MNH services in their catchment.

Project description:Palliative care aims to improve quality of life for people with serious illness and their families. One potential barrier to palliative care uptake is inaccurate knowledge and/or negative beliefs among the general population, which may inhibit early interest in, communication about, and integration of palliative care following subsequent illness diagnosis. We explored knowledge and beliefs about palliative care among the general public using nationally-representative data collected in 2018 as part of the cross-sectional Health Information National Trends Survey. Only individuals who had heard of palliative care (n = 1,162, Mage = 51.8, 64% female) were queried on knowledge and beliefs. We examined whether self-assessed level of awareness of palliative care (i.e., knowing a little vs. enough to explain it) was associated with the relative likelihood of having accurate/positive beliefs, inaccurate/negative beliefs, or responding "don't know" to questions about palliative care. Respondents who indicated knowing a lot about palliative care had more accurate versus inaccurate knowledge than those who knew a little on only two of six items and more positive attitudes on only one of three items. In particular, respondents with greater awareness were equally likely to report that palliative care is the same as hospice and requires stopping other treatments, and equally likely to believe that palliative care means giving up and to associate palliative care with death. Those with higher awareness were less likely than those with lower awareness to respond "don't know," but greater awareness was not necessarily associated with having accurate or positive beliefs about palliative care as opposed to inaccurate or negative beliefs. Thus, even members of the general public who perceived themselves to know a lot about palliative care were often no less likely to report inaccurate knowledge or negative beliefs (versus accurate and positive, respectively). Findings suggest a need to improve awareness and attitudes about palliative care.