Development of a patient decision aid for discharge planning of hospitalized patients with stroke.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Patient involvement in discharge planning of patients with stroke can be accomplished by providing personalized outcome information and promoting shared decision-making. The aim of this study was to develop a patient decision aid (PtDA) for discharge planning of hospitalized patients with stroke.Methods
A convergent mixed methods design was used, starting with needs assessments among patients with stroke and health care professionals (HCPs). Results of these assessments were used to develop the PtDA with integrated outcome information in several co-creation sessions. Subsequently, acceptability and usability were tested to optimize the PtDA. Development was guided by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) criteria.Results
In total, 74 patients and 111 HCPs participated in this study. A three-component PtDA was developed, consisting of: 1) a printed consultation sheet to introduce the options for discharge destinations, containing information that can be specified for each individual patient; 2) an online information and deliberation tool to support patient education and clarification of patient values, containing an integrated "patients-like-me" model with outcome information about discharge destinations; 3) a summary sheet to support actual decision-making during consultation, containing the patient's values and preferences concerning discharge planning. In the acceptability test, all qualifying and certifying IPDAS criteria were fulfilled. The usability test showed that patients and HCPs highly appreciated the PtDA with integrated outcome information.Conclusions
The developed PtDA was found acceptable and usable by patients and HCPs and is currently under investigation in a clinical trial to determine its effectiveness.
SUBMITTER: Prick JCM
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9254531 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundA standardized discharge plan is important to continuous medical care and discharge management of stroke patients. Currently, there is a lack of high-quality, evidence-based discharge planning guidelines for stroke patients. Most existing discharge planning guidelines have been developed for other diseases and stroke-related guidelines focus more on prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and less on discharge planning. Therefore, they do not provide a systematic and comprehensive answer to the key issues of discharge planning for stroke patients. To improve the level of recovery and quality of life of stroke patients, to better guide clinical caregivers in developing and implementing discharge plans, the Evidence-based Nursing Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University and the World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation have jointly initiated the development of the clinical practice guideline for discharge planning of patients with stroke.MethodsThe guideline development process is designed to follow the WHO handbook for guideline development and Guidelines 2.0. Evidence grading and guideline recommendations are based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). The key steps in developing the guideline include: (I) establishing the guideline working groups; (II) selecting the priority clinical questions; (III) evidence retrieval and evaluation; (IV) grading the quality of evidence; (V) forming recommendations; and (VI) external review.DiscussionThis guideline will follow the clinical characteristics and management priorities of stroke and will be developed by a multidisciplinary guideline development team, in strict accordance with the core principles and methods of guideline development. This guideline will provide an evidence-based reference for standardized discharge screening, assessment, discharge procedures, and outpatient follow up, so as to improve the quality of discharge services and standardize the discharge management of stroke patients, and ultimately improve their post-discharge rehabilitation and quality of life.Trial registrationThe guideline was registered at the Practice guidelines REgistration for transPAREncy. The registration No. is IPGRP-2022CN331.
| S-EPMC9511188 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundShared decision making (SDM) is a systematic approach aimed at improving patient involvement in preference-sensitive health care decisions. Choosing between surgical or non-surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation, can be difficult as the evidence of a superior treatment is unclear, which makes it a preference-sensitive decision. The objectives of this study was therefore to assess the degree of SDM and afterwards to develop and test a patient decision aid (PtDA) to support SDM during the clinical encounter between surgeon and patient, when patients choose between surgical and non-surgical treatment for Lumbar disc herniation (LDH).MethodsThe study was conducted in four steps. 1) Assessment of the extent to which SDM was practiced in the spine clinic. 2) Development of a PtDA to support SDM. 3) Testing its usability and acceptability amongst potential users (patients). 4) Pilot-test of its usability in the clinical setting.ResultsResults from our small baseline study (n =?40) showed that between a third and two-thirds of the patients reported not being fully engaged in a shared decision. A pre-designed template (BESLUTNINGSHJÆLPER™) was adapted to support the decision about whether or not to have surgery for LDH. Testing the prototype with patients led to minor refinements. A subsequent pilot test of its usability in a clinical setting achieved positive responses from both patients and clinicians.ConclusionOur baseline study demonstrated that SDM was not universally practiced in the clinic. The PtDA we have developed was rated as acceptable and usable by both patients and clinicians for helping those with LDH choose between surgical or non- surgical treatment. This tool now requires further testing to assess its effectiveness.
| S-EPMC6778367 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) patients often struggle with treatment decisions, in part due to the increasing number of approved disease modifying therapies, each with different characteristics, and also since physicians can struggle to identify which of these characteristics matter most to each individual patient. Decision uncertainty can contribute to late treatment initiation and treatment non-adherence-causes of 'undertreatment' in MS. An interactive online patient decision aid that informs patients of their options, considers their individual preferences and goals, and facilitates conversations with their physicians, could improve how patients with relapsing forms of MS make evidence-based treatment decisions.ObjectiveTo develop and evaluate a prototype patient decision aid (PtDA) for first-line disease modifying therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.MethodsInformed by previous studies and International Patient Decision Aid Standards guidelines, a prototype PtDA was developed for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis considering first line treatment. Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis were recruited from the University of British Columbia's Multiple Sclerosis Clinic to participate in either an online survey or a focus group. Online survey participants completed the PtDA, followed by measures of acceptability, usability, and preparedness for decision-making, and provided general feedback. Focus group participants assessed usability of the revised PtDA. The analysis of qualitative and quantitative data led to improvements of the PtDA prototype.ResultsThe prototype PtDA received high ratings for acceptability and usability, and after its use, participants reported high-levels of preparedness for decision-making. Analysis of all qualitative data identified three key themes: the need for credible information; the usefulness of the PtDA; and the importance of normalizing and sharing experiences. Nine content areas were identified for revision. Overall, participants found the PtDA to be a valuable tool for facilitating treatment decisions.ConclusionsThis mixed methods study has led to the development of a PtDA that can support patients with RRMS as they make treatment decisions. Future studies will assess the feasibility of implementation and the impact of the PtDA on both the timely treatment initiation and longer-term adherence.
| S-EPMC6642472 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Patients with a diagnosis of dementia face various important social and health-related decisions. Due to the progression of the disease it seems crucial that patients try to deal with these decisions early in the course of the disease to have the opportunity to make decisions autonomously. Professional support can help to plan in advance according to the wishes and possibilities in an effective and individualized manner. MATERIAL AND METHODS:The instrument was developed in a multiphase process based on advance care planning and shared decision-making. The prototype was pretested on 8 patient-relative dyads from a special outpatient department for early recognition and adapted as best as possible to their needs. Subsequently, in a pilot study the applicability of the decision aid was tested as an intervention in a further 19 patient-relative dyads with trained conversion attendants (diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia or mixed form; mini mental state examination, MMSE (Mini-Mental-State-Test-Summenwert) >20 and <27). RESULTS:The result was a written decision-making aid for people with early stage dementia and their relatives, which supports the decision-making process (health care proxy, advance directive, living and care, driving ability). The first results showed good acceptance and handling. Patients and relatives dealt with the individual topics to a high degree and found them to be highly relevant. CONCLUSION:Despite positive feedback from the participants with respect to acceptance and applicability, there were major difficulties in recruiting. In the future, the systematic use of decision support as part of routine care could help to support the decision-making process in this patient group.
| S-EPMC7606278 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPatient decision aids (PtDAs) support patients and clinicians in shared decision-making (SDM). Real-world outcome information may improve patients' risk perception, and help patients make decisions congruent with their expectations and values. Our aim was to develop an online PtDA to support kidney failure treatment modality decision-making, that: 1) provides patients with real-world outcome information, and 2) facilitates SDM in clinical practice.MethodsThe International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) development process model was complemented with a user-centred and convergent mixed-methods approach. Rapid prototyping was used to develop the PtDA with a multidisciplinary steering group in an iterative process of co-creation. The results of an exploratory evidence review and a needs-assessment among patients, caregivers, and clinicians were used to develop the PtDA. Seven Dutch teaching hospitals and two national Dutch outcome registries provided real-world data on selected outcomes for all kidney failure treatment modalities. Alpha and beta testing were performed to assess the prototype and finalise development. An implementation strategy was developed to guide implementation of the PtDA in clinical practice.ResultsThe 'Kidney Failure Decision Aid' consists of three components designed to help patients and clinicians engage in SDM: 1) a paper hand-out sheet, 2) an interactive website, and 3) a personal summary sheet. A 'patients-like-me' infographic was developed to visualise survival probabilities for each treatment modality on the website. Other treatment outcomes were incorporated as event rates (e.g. hospitalisation rates) or explained in text (e.g. the flexibility of each treatment modality). No major revisions were needed after alpha and beta testing. During beta testing, some patients ignored the survival probabilities because they considered these too confronting. Nonetheless, patients agreed that every patient has the right to choose whether they want to view this information. Patients and clinicians believed that the PtDA would help patients make informed decisions, and that it would support values- and preferences-based decision-making. Implementation of the PtDA has started in October 2020.ConclusionsThe 'Kidney Failure Decision Aid' was designed to facilitate SDM in clinical practice and contains real-world outcome information on all kidney failure treatment modalities. It is currently being investigated for its effects on SDM in a clinical trial.
| S-EPMC9257566 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Prolonged hospital lengths of stay increase costs, delay rehabilitation, and expose acute ischemic stroke patients to hospital-acquired infections. We designed and implemented a nurse-driven transitions of care coordinator (TOCC) program to facilitate the transition of care from the acute care hospital setting to rehabilitation centers and home. Methods: This was a single-blinded, prospective, randomized pilot study of 40 participants to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a TOCC program led by a stroke nurse navigator in hospitalized acute ischemic stroke patients. The intervention consisted of a stroke nurse navigator completing eight specific tasks, including meeting with stroke patients and their families, facilitating communication between team members at multi-disciplinary rounds, assisting with referrals to rehabilitation facilities, providing stroke education, and arranging stroke clinic follow-up appointments, which were confirmed to be completed by independent study personnel. The primary outcome was to assess the feasibility of the program. The secondary outcomes included comparing hospital length of stay (LOS) and patient satisfaction between the TOCC and usual care groups. We also explored the association between patient-level variables and LOS. Results: The TOCC program was feasible with all pre-specified components completed in 84.2% (95% CI: 60.4-96.6%) and was not significantly different from the assumed completion rate of 75% (p = 0.438). There was no significant difference in median LOS between the two groups [TOCC 5.95 days (4.02, 9.57) vs. usual care 4.01 days (2.00, 10.45), false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted p = 0.138]. There was a trend toward higher patient median satisfaction in the TOCC group [TOCC 35.00 (33.00, 35.00) vs. usual care 30 (26.00, 35.00), FDR-adjusted p = 0.1] as assessed by a questionnaire at 30 days after discharge. The TOCC study allowed us to identify patient variables (gender, insurance, stroke severity, and discharge disposition) that were significantly associated with longer hospital LOS. Conclusion: A TOCC program is feasible and can serve as a guide for future allocation of resources to facilitate transitions of care and avoid prolonged hospital stays.
| S-EPMC8165227 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Surgery is the primary component of curative treatment for patients with rectal cancer. However, patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) after neo-adjuvant treatment may avoid the morbidity and mortality of radical surgery. An organ-sparing strategy could be an oncological equivalent alternative. Therefore, shared decision making between the patient and the healthcare professional (HCP) should take place. This can be facilitated by a patient decision aid (PtDA). In this study, we developed a PtDA based on a literature review and the key elements of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Additionally, a qualitative study was performed to review and evaluate the PtDA by both HCPs and former rectal cancer patients by a Delphi procedure and semi-structured interviews, respectively. A strong consensus was reached after the first round (I-CVI 0.85-1). Eleven patients were interviewed and most of them indicated that using a PtDA in clinical practice would be of added value in the decision making. Patients indicated that their decisional needs are centered on the impact of side effects on their quality of life and the outcome of the different options. The PtDA was modified taking into account the remarks of patients and HCPs and a second Delphi round was held. The second round again showed a strong consensus (I-CVI 0.87-1).
| S-EPMC9913303 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDespite high rates of mental health disorders among cancer patients, uptake of referral to psycho-oncology services remains low. This study aims to develop and seek clinician and patient feedback on a patient decision aid (PDA) for cancer patients making decisions about treatment for anxiety and/or depression.MethodsDevelopment was informed by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Psycho-oncology professionals provided feedback on the clinical accuracy, acceptability, and usability of a prototype PDA. Cognitive interviews with 21 cancer patients/survivors assessed comprehensibility, acceptability, and usefulness. Interviews were thematically analysed using Framework Analysis.ResultsClinicians and patients strongly endorsed the PDA. Clinicians suggested minor amendments to improve clarity and increase engagement. Patient feedback focused on clarifying the purpose of the PDA and improving the clarity of the values clarification exercises (VCEs).ConclusionsThe PDA, the first of its kind for psycho-oncology, was acceptable to clinicians and patients. Valuable feedback was obtained for the revision of the PDA and VCEs.
| S-EPMC10080801 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThe aim of this study was to develop a patient decision aid (pDA) that could support patients with breast cancer (BC) in making an informed decision about breast reconstruction (BR) after mastectomy.MethodsThe development included four stages: (i) Establishment of a multidisciplinary team; (ii) Needs assessment consisting of semi-structured interviews in patients and a survey among healthcare professionals (HCPs); (iii) Creation of content, design and technical system; and (iv) Acceptability and usability testing using a think-aloud approach in patients and interviews among HCPs and representatives of the Dutch Breast Cancer Patient Organization.ResultsFrom the needs assessment, three themes were identified: Challenging period to make a decision, Diverse motivations for a personal decision and Information needed to make a decision about BR. HCPs valued the development of a pDA, especially to prepare patients for consultation. The pDA that was developed contained three parts: first, a consultation sheet for oncological breast surgeons to introduce the choice; second, an online tool including an overview of reconstructive options, the pros and cons of each option, information on the consequences of each option for daily life, exercises to clarify personal values and patient stories; and third, a summary sheet with patients' values, preferences and questions to help inform and guide the discussion between the patient and her plastic surgeon. The pDA was perceived to be informative, helpful and easy to use by patients and HCPs.ConclusionConsistent with information needs, a pDA was developed to support patients with BC who consider immediate BR in making an informed decision together with their plastic surgeon.Patient or public contributionPatients participated in the needs assessment and in acceptability and usability testing.
| S-EPMC8849254 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Objective: The objective was to develop a decision aid (DA) to facilitate shared decision making (SDM) around whether to obtain computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected uncomplicated ureterolithiasis.Methods: We used evidence-based DA development methods, including qualitative methods and iterative stakeholder engagement, to develop and refine a DA. Guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS), and a steering committee made up of stakeholders, we conducted interviews and focus groups with a purposive sample of patients, community members, emergency clinicians, and other stakeholders. We used an iterative process to code the transcripts and identify themes. We beta-tested the DA with patient-clinician dyads facing the decision in real time.Results: From August 2018 to August 2019, we engaged 102 participants in the design and iterative refinement of a DA focused on diagnostic options for patients with suspected ureterolithiasis. Forty-six were ED patients, community members, or patients with ureterolithiasis, and the remaining were emergency clinicians (doctors, residents, advanced practitioners), researchers, urologists, nurses, or other physicians. Patients and clinicians identified several key decisional needs including an understanding of accuracy, uncertainty, radiation exposure/cancer risk, and clear return precautions. Patients and community members identified facilitators to SDM, such as a checklist of signs and symptoms. Many stakeholders, including both patients and ED clinicians, expressed a strong pro-CT bias. A six-page DA was developed, iteratively refined, and beta-tested.Conclusions: Using stakeholder engagement and qualitative inquiry, we developed an evidence-based DA to facilitate SDM around the question of CT scan utilization in patients with suspected uncomplicated ureterolithiasis. Future research will test the efficacy of the DA in facilitating SDM.
| S-EPMC7580689 | biostudies-literature