Dataset Information

COMPERA 2.0: a refined four-stratum risk assessment model for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Risk stratification plays an essential role in the management of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The current European guidelines propose a three-stratum model to categorise risk as low, intermediate or high, based on the expected 1-year mortality. However, with this model, most patients are categorised as intermediate risk. We investigated a modified approach based on four risk categories, with intermediate risk subdivided into intermediate-low and intermediate-high risk.

Methods

We analysed data from the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA), a European pulmonary hypertension registry, and calculated risk at diagnosis and first follow-up based on World Health Organization functional class, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and serum levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP), using refined cut-off values. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses, log-rank testing and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Data from 1655 patients with PAH were analysed. Using the three-stratum model, most patients were classified as intermediate risk (76.0% at baseline and 63.9% at first follow-up). The refined four-stratum risk model yielded a more nuanced separation and predicted long-term survival, especially at follow-up assessment. Changes in risk from baseline to follow-up were observed in 31.1% of the patients with the three-stratum model and in 49.2% with the four-stratum model. These changes, including those between the intermediate-low and intermediate-high strata, were associated with changes in long-term mortality risk.

Conclusions

Modified risk stratification using a four-stratum model based on refined cut-off levels for functional class, 6MWD and BNP/NT-proBNP was more sensitive to prognostically relevant changes in risk than the original three-stratum model.

SUBMITTER: Hoeper MM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9260123 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

COMPERA 2.0: a refined four-stratum risk assessment model for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Hoeper Marius M MM Pausch Christine C Olsson Karen M KM Huscher Doerte D Pittrow David D Grünig Ekkehard E Staehler Gerd G Vizza Carmine Dario CD Gall Henning H Distler Oliver O Opitz Christian C Gibbs J Simon R JSR Delcroix Marion M Ghofrani H Ardeschir HA Park Da-Hee DH Ewert Ralf R Kaemmerer Harald H Kabitz Hans-Joachim HJ Skowasch Dirk D Behr Juergen J Milger Katrin K Halank Michael M Wilkens Heinrike H Seyfarth Hans-Jürgen HJ Held Matthias M Dumitrescu Daniel D Tsangaris Iraklis I Vonk-Noordegraaf Anton A Ulrich Silvia S Klose Hans H Claussen Martin M Lange Tobias J TJ Rosenkranz Stephan S

The European respiratory journal 20220707 1

<h4>Background</h4>Risk stratification plays an essential role in the management of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The current European guidelines propose a three-stratum model to categorise risk as low, intermediate or high, based on the expected 1-year mortality. However, with this model, most patients are categorised as intermediate risk. We investigated a modified approach based on four risk categories, with intermediate risk subdivided into intermediate-low and interme ...[more]

PMID: 34737226

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe COMPERA 2.0 4-stratum (4-S) risk score has been demonstrated superior over the 3-stratum (3-S) one in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and medically managed patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We aimed to determine the prognostic value of the original 4-S and 3-S COMPERA 2.0 risk score and two new derivative versions in CTEPH patients who underwent balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA).MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 175 BPA-treated patients with CTEPH. We assessed the risk stratification before and after each BPA session of CTEPH patients by the original 4-S and 3-S COMPERA 2.0 risk score (by rounding decimal to the nearest integer) and two new proposed derivative versions: the modified version (by rounding decimal to the next integer) and a hybrid version that fuses the original and modified versions. The primary endpoint was clinical worsening events. The secondary outcomes were achieving low-risk profile and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) < 30 mmHg at follow-up. We used the Kaplan-Meier curve analysis to assess the survival differences between stratified patients. The comparative model's performance was evaluated in terms of discrimination by Harrell's C-index.ResultsAll versions of COMPERA 2.0 4-S model outperformed the 3-S one in discriminating the differences in echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters and clinical worsening-free survival rates. The original and hybrid 4-S model could independently predict the primary and secondary endpoints, and the hybrid version seemed to perform better. The first BPA session could significantly improve risk profiles, and these changes were associated with the likelihood of experiencing clinical worsening events, achieving a low-risk profile and mPAP < 30 mmHg at follow-up. The number of BPA sessions required to achieve low risk/mPAP < 30 mmHg increased as the baseline risk score escalated.ConclusionsThe COMPERA 2.0 4-S model outperformed the 3-S one in BPA-treated patients with CTEPH. The 4-S model, especially its hybrid version, could be used to predict clinical outcome before the initiation of BPA and monitor treatment response.

Project description:Risk stratification is an essential tool in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). These tools lack detailed echocardiographic assessment which plays a central role in clinical risk assessment in PAH. Thus, we aimed at assessing whether adding echocardiography-driven data to REVEAL Lite 2.0 (Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management) improves the assessment of risk stratification in PAH. A retrospective analysis of 134 consecutive patients between January 2016 and December 2019 was done. We identified patients who experienced a disease progression "event" defined by the initiation of intravenous (IV) or parenteral prostacyclin, transplant referral, or death due to PAH. All other PAH patients who did not experience an "event" during this period were included in the analysis as controls. Echocardiography and REVEAL Lite 2.0 were collected from 4 to 8 months before the event and compared with the control group to predict the risk of a disease progression event. One hundred and ten patients were included in the final analysis with 22 experiencing a disease progression event and 88 remaining stable during the study period. Different echocardiographic parameters were combined with REVEAL Lite 2.0 scores in both groups. The combination of REVEAL Lite 2.0 and the left ventricular end-diastolic (LVED) eccentricity index (as a continuous variable) had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87, which approached a significant difference with that of the REVEAL Lite 2.0 alone (p = 0.052). An additional multivariable regression model that included REVEAL Lite 2.0, LVED eccentricity index as a continuous variable, and RAP achieved the best AUC at 0.88 (0.80, 0.96), which was significantly different from that of the REVEAL Lite 2.0 alone (AUC 0.77 [0.66, 0.88]; p = 0.049). These results suggest that combining different echocardiographic parameters to REVEAL Lite 2.0 provides more statistically accurate risk predictions compared to REVEAL Lite 2.0 alone. A combination of LVED eccentricity index with REVEAL Lite 2.0 achieved the best AUC in predicting the event in our cohort.

Dataset Information

COMPERA 2.0: a refined four-stratum risk assessment model for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

COMPERA 2.0: a refined four-stratum risk assessment model for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets