Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

20 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Novel apical-to-femoral rail technique for horizontal aorta in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

ABSTRACT: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a viable treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis regardless of its surgical risk stratification (Otto et al., 2021). Aortic angulation is usually measured as the angle between the horizontal and the aortic annulus planes based on preproced‍ural multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) (Al-Lamee et al., 2011). Extremely horizontal aorta, defined as an aortic angulation greater than 70°, is an unfavorable anatomic structure that poses particular technical challenges for TAVR. Abramowitz et al. (2016) have proved that an extremely horizontal aorta increased the risk of procedural complications, such as lower device success rates, more moderate or even severe perivalvular leakage (PVL), and the need for second valve implantation. Because of the long stent frame, inflexibility, and non-steerability, it is challenging to pass the delivery system of self-expanding valves (SEVs) through an extremely horizontal aorta. As a result, patients with an extremely horizontal aorta have always been excluded from the clinical trials of TAVR, and transfemoral (TF)-TAVR with SEV is considered as an "off-label" use of TAVR (Adams et al., 2014; Kaneko et al., 2020). Herein, we present a technically difficult case, in which a patient with an extremely horizontal aorta underwent TF-TAVR with SEV by applying a unique apical-to-femoral rail strategy.

SUBMITTER: Liu X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9264111 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Choosing transcatheter aortic valve replacement in porcelain aorta: outcomes versus surgical replacement.

Project description:ObjectivesPorcelain aorta complicates aortic valve replacement and is an indication for transcatheter approaches. No study has compared surgical and transcatheter valve replacement in the setting of porcelain aorta. We characterize porcelain aorta patients undergoing aortic valve replacement and the association of aortic calcification and outcomes.MethodsPatients undergoing aortic valve replacement with porcelain aorta were identified. Aortic calcium volume was determined using 3D computed tomography thresholding techniques. Propensity scoring was performed to assess the effect of surgical versus transcatheter approaches. Risk factors for composite major hospital complications (death, stroke and dialysis) were identified using random forest machine learning.ResultsFrom January 2006 to January 2015, 164 patients with porcelain aorta underwent aortic valve replacement [105 (64%) surgical replacement, 59 (36%) transcatheter replacement]. Propensity scoring matched 29 pairs (49% of transcatheter patients). Before matching, 5-year survival was 41% [(43% surgical, 35% transcatheter, P(log-rank) = 0.9]. After matching, mortality for surgical versus transcatheter replacement was 3.4% (n = 1) vs 10% (n = 3), stroke 14% (n = 4) vs 3.4% (n = 1) and dialysis 6.9% (n = 2) versus 11% (n = 3). Matched 5-year survival was 40% after surgical replacement and 29% after transcatheter replacement [P(log-rank) = 0.4]. Total aortic calcium volume was greater in transcatheter than surgical patients [18 (8.0) vs 17 (7.7) ml] and was associated with more major hospital complications after either approach.ConclusionsSurgical and transcatheter approaches are complementary options for aortic stenosis with porcelain aorta. Surgical valve replacement remains an effective treatment for patients requiring concomitant procedures. Quantifying aortic calcium volume is a helpful risk predictor in all patients with porcelain aorta.

| S-EPMC10894003 | biostudies-literature

Modified valve-in-valve bailout technique of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in severe aortic regurgitation for valve jumping up to ascending aorta: a case report.

Project description:BackgroundAortic regurgitation remains a challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), because of the high risk of post-procedural migration or paravalvular leakage resulting from the anatomical and pathophysiological features.Case summaryA 75-year-old male with symptomatic severe aortic regurgitation underwent transfemoral TAVR due to poor physical condition and a Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 11.3%. However, complete dislodgement of the valve into the ascending aorta occurred during the operation. We performed a modified valve-in-valve technique by using an ablation catheter (instead of performing urgent surgery), and no post-interventional complications were found during hospitalization. The patient was discharged in a stable condition on postoperative Day 12. At the 6-month follow-up, echocardiography showed trivial paravalvular leakage. The left ventricular ejection fraction further improved from 30 to 48%.DiscussionThe management of valve migration can be troublesome. In this case, we performed a modified valve-in-valve technique by using an ablation catheter without post-interventional complications. This is a novel strategy for the management of emergencies, which could avoid surgical thoracotomy. Our strategy may be an alternative option in some cases of valve jumping up to the ascending aorta.

| S-EPMC9382568 | biostudies-literature

Midterm Degeneration of Transcatheter Heart Valve Device following Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Requiring Repeat Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7451866 | biostudies-literature

Transoesophageal echocardiography-guided wire technique for crossing a stenosed aortic valve during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC9706754 | biostudies-literature

Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation for bicuspid aortic stenosis with tortuous aorta after total arch replacement.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC8789732 | biostudies-literature

Transcatheter valve-in-valve aortic valve replacement with bioprosthetic valve Fracture/Stretching technique in a degenerated mitroflow valve.

Project description:We describe a successful bioprosthetic annular stretching in a patient with severe prosthetic aortic valve stenosis from a degenerated 19-mm Mitroflow valve (Sorin Group USA Inc, Arvada, CO, USA). This technique allowed for implantation of a 23-mm Evolut-R Pro valve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) with significant improvement in hemodynamics after prosthetic annular stretching. We have also summarized other case series and case reports which have previously described similar techniques. <Learning objective: Transcatheter valve-in-valve procedure may not be feasible in certain patients who have a relatively smaller size bioprosthetic valve. Cracking/stretching the annular ring of the smaller prosthetic valve to deploy a larger transcatheter valve is a potential option in these patients. Clinicians must be cognizant of the possible pitfalls, contraindications, and other technical aspects to choose the right patient for this procedure.>.

| S-EPMC7195570 | biostudies-literature

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Insufficiency After Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement.

Project description:Bicuspid aortic insufficiency (BAI) patients with root aneurysm often require aortic valve and root replacement in a composite procedure. The valve-sparing root replacement (VSARR) procedure is aimed at preserving the native valve when possible. This case highlights a successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedure in a BAI patient previously treated with VSARR. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

| S-EPMC8642721 | biostudies-literature

Pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared to surgical aortic valve replacement.

Project description:AbstractTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a standard treatment indicated for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of pacemaker dependency after permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following TAVR or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and the risk of mortality at a tertiary center in Korea.In this retrospective study conducted at a single tertiary center, clinical outcomes related to pacemaker dependency were evaluated for patients implanted with pacemakers after TAVR from January 2012 to November 2018 and post-SAVR from January 2005 to May 2015. Investigators reviewed patients' electrocardiograms and baseline rhythms as well as conduction abnormalities. Pacemaker dependency was defined as a ventricular pacing rate > 90% with an intrinsic rate of <40 bpm during interrogation.Of 511 patients who underwent TAVR for severe AS, 37(7.3%) underwent PPI after a median duration of 6 (3-7) days, whereas pacemakers were implanted after a median interval of 13 (8-28) days post-SAVR in 10 of 663 patients (P < .001). Pacemaker dependency was observed in 36 (97.3%) patients during 7 days immediately post-TAVR and in 25 (64.9%) patients between 8 and 180 days post-TAVR. Pacemaker dependency occurred after 180 days in 17 (50%) patients with TAVR and in 4 (44.4%) patients with SAVR. Twelve (41.4%) patients were pacemaker-dependent after 365 days post-TAVR.Pacemaker dependency did not differ at 6 months after TAVR vs SAVR. In patients undergoing post-TAVR PPI, 58.6% were not pacemaker-dependent at 1 year after the TAVR procedure.

| S-EPMC8183801 | biostudies-literature

Update on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Project description:Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a minimally invasive approach to treat symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. The patient populations that have been shown to benefit from this procedure continue to grow with time. Techniques and technology in TAVR persistently advance with a continued trend toward improved outcomes for patients. In this review, we highlight the advances in vascular access, TAVR valve design, progress in reducing procedural complications, and emerging evidence in the field.

| S-EPMC7237626 | biostudies-literature

Stroke after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC9912968 | biostudies-literature