Dataset Information

Diagnostic Utility of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

ABSTRACT:

Purpose of Review

This review summarizes the diverse uses of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in critically ill children with congenital and acquired heart disease. Diagnostic utility and practicality of POCUS is reviewed. Importantly, the role of POCUS in the medical management of children in the cardiac intensive care unit is highlighted.

Recent Findings

The use of POCUS in critically ill pediatric patients has emerged as an essential diagnostic tool that enhances the physical examination and influences delivery of care. Assessment of a wide range of body systems and pathologies has been impacted by the use of POCUS. Recent studies have demonstrated the use of POCUS for evaluation of cardiac tamponade, pneumonia, vocal cord function, and loss of muscle mass in critically ill children (Hamilton et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med 22(10):e532-e539, 2021; Hoffmann et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med 22(10):889-897, 2021; Najgrodzka et al. Ultrasound Q 35(2):157 163, 2019; Alerhand et al. Pediatr Ann 50(10):e424-e431, 2021).

Summary

POCUS is a non-invasive, low-risk, imaging modality that can be used to diagnose and help guide management of critically ill children in the cardiac intensive care unit. POCUS can be performed by an intensivist at the patient’s bedside with real-time interpretation, leading to rapid clinical decision-making and the hope of improving patient outcomes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40746-022-00250-1.

SUBMITTER: Persson J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9264295 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPoint of care ultrasound (POCUS) is a cost-effective, non-invasive procedure with high diagnostic reliability and therapeutic utilities. For various reasons, it is not being used routinely in neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU). We have introduced a systematic use of POCUS in critically ill patients in our neurosurgical ICU. We have studied the various indications and benefit of using this technique.MethodsThis is a prospective, single center cohort observational study done in patients who were admitted in a tertiary neurosurgical ICU over 1 year (17th September 2020 to 16th September 2021). POCUS was used daily as per a standardized format for multiple purposes. A formal training to the operator was provided and standardized method of evaluation and intervention was used. Outcome was studied to understand the impact of the POCUS and difficulties encountered during its use.ResultsPOCUS was used in 240 patients, including all patients for primary and secondary surveys, 192 patients (80%) for optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement, 14 myelomeningoceles for trans-fontanelle ultrasound study, 16 post operative cases of aneurysm clipping for transcranial Doppler (TCD) study, 86 patients for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) screening, 17 for evaluation of ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunt functionality, 30 for transcranial defect ultrasound, 45 for chest ultrasound, 4 for evaluation of hemodynamic shock and 67 patients who had difficult cannualtion or while insertion of central venous catheter placement. POCUS was also used for difficult cannulation, central catheter placement and e-FAST scan. Significant findings were reported 129 times, which led to immediate change in management in 62 patients (25.83%) as compared to 16 patients in whom significant findings were not reported using POCUS, but management was changed using other radiological modalities (P<0.01). There was initial lag in adopting the technique, however with practice, the team developed confidence. As a result, the accuracy and time taken to perform the procedure was reduced significantly.ConclusionsRoutine systematic use of POCUS can be beneficial not only for the rapid diagnosis and prompt management of patients, but also helpful in monitoring and performing various procedures in neurosurgical ICU. Though not all modalities mentioned in standardized format was used in all patients, use of this format has helped improved training and maintain proper use of POCUS in our ICU.

Project description:BackgroundEvidence from previous studies comparing lung ultrasound to thoracic computed tomography (CT) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is limited due to multiple methodologic weaknesses. While addressing methodologic weaknesses of previous studies, the primary aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound in a tertiary ICU population.MethodsThis is a single-center, prospective diagnostic accuracy study conducted at a tertiary ICU in the Netherlands. Critically ill patients undergoing thoracic CT for any clinical indication were included. Patients were excluded if time between the index and reference test was over eight hours. Index test and reference test consisted of 6-zone lung ultrasound and thoracic CT, respectively. Hemithoraces were classified by the index and reference test as follows: consolidation, interstitial syndrome, pneumothorax and pleural effusion. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio were estimated.ResultsIn total, 87 patients were included of which eight exceeded the time limit and were subsequently excluded. In total, there were 147 respiratory conditions in 79 patients. The estimated sensitivity and specificity to detect consolidation were 0.76 (95%CI: 0.68 to 0.82) and 0.92 (0.87 to 0.96), respectively. For interstitial syndrome they were 0.60 (95%CI: 0.48 to 0.71) and 0.69 (95%CI: 0.58 to 0.79). For pneumothorax they were 0.59 (95%CI: 0.33 to 0.82) and 0.97 (95%CI: 0.93 to 0.99). For pleural effusion they were 0.85 (95%CI: 0.77 to 0.91) and 0.77 (95%CI: 0.62 to 0.88).ConclusionsIn conclusion, lung ultrasound is an adequate diagnostic modality in a tertiary ICU population to detect consolidations, interstitial syndrome, pneumothorax and pleural effusion. Moreover, one should be careful not to interpret lung ultrasound results in deterministic fashion as multiple respiratory conditions can be present in one patient. Trial registration This study was retrospectively registered at Netherlands Trial Register on March 17, 2021, with registration number NL9344.

Project description:BackgroundSimulators are an extensively utilized teaching tool in clinical settings. Simulation enables learners to practice and improve their skills in a safe and controlled environment before using these skills on patients. We evaluated the effect of a training session utilizing a novel intubation ultrasound simulator on the accuracy of provider detection of tracheal versus esophageal neonatal endotracheal tube (ETT) placement using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). We also investigated whether the time to POCUS image interpretation decreased with repeated simulator attempts.MethodsSixty neonatal health care providers participated in a three-hour simulator-based training session in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi, Pakistan. Participants included neonatologists, neonatal fellows, pediatric residents and senior nursing staff. The training utilized a novel low-cost simulator made with gelatin, water and psyllium fiber. Training consisted of a didactic session, practice with the simulator, and practice with intubated NICU patients. At the end of training, participants underwent an objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) and ten rounds of simulator-based testing of their ability to use POCUS to differentiate between simulated tracheal and esophageal intubations.ResultsThe majority of the participants in the training had an average of 7.0 years (SD 4.9) of clinical experience. After controlling for gender, profession, years of practice and POCUS knowledge, linear mixed model and mixed effects logistic regression demonstrated marginal improvement in POCUS interpretation over repeated simulator testing. The mean time-to-interpretation decreased from 24.7 (SD 20.3) seconds for test 1 to 10.1 (SD 4.5) seconds for Test 10, p < 0.001. There was an average reduction of 1.3 s (β = - 1.3; 95% CI: - 1.66 to - 1.0) in time-to-interpretation with repeated simulator testing after adjusting for the covariates listed above.ConclusionWe found a three-hour simulator-based training session had a significant impact on technical skills and performance of neonatal health care providers in identification of ETT position using POCUS. Further research is needed to examine whether these skills are transferable to intubated newborns in various health settings.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03533218 . Registered May 2018.