Immunotherapy in NSCLC Patients with Brain Metastases.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Buriolla S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9267075 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Immunotherapy has now been integrated as a treatment strategy for most patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the pivotal clinical trials that demonstrated its impressive efficacy often did not include patients with active, untreated brain metastases or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Nevertheless, NSCLC is the most common tumor to metastasize to the brain, and patients develop brain and meningeal involvement in approximately 40 and 10% of cases, respectively. Consequently, the appropriate care of these patients is a recurrent clinical concern. Although there are many aspects that would merit further investigation to explain the mechanism of intracranial response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPs), some data suggest that they are able to cross the blood-brain barrier, resulting in local tumor microenvironment modification. This results in a similar clinical benefit in patients with stable, previously treated brain metastases compared to the general population. Despite important limitations, some real-life studies have described that the ICPs' efficacy was maintained also in less selected patients with untreated or symptomatic brain metastases. In contrast, few data are available about patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Nevertheless, neurological complications due to ICP treatment in patients with brain metastases have to be evaluated and carefully monitored. Despite the fact that limited data are available in the literature, the purpose of this review is to show that the multimodal treatment of these patients with brain metastases and/or leptomeningeal disease should be discussed during tracing of the history of the disease, participating in the local and possibly systemic control of NSCLC.
| S-EPMC9039308 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases have a multitude of treatment options, but there is currently no international and multidisciplinary consensus concerning their optimal treatment. Local therapies have the principal role, especially in symptomatic patients. Advances in surgery and radiation therapy manage considerable local control. Systemic treatments have shown effect in clinical trials and in real life clinical settings; yet, at present, this is restricted to patients with asymptomatic or stable intracranial lesions. Targeted agents can have a benefit only in patients with EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangement. Immunotherapy has shown impressive results in patients with PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. Its effects can be further enhanced by a synergy with radiotherapy, possibly by increasing the percentage of responders. The present review summarizes the need for more effective systemic treatments, so that the increased intracranial control achieved by local treatments can be translated in an increase in overall survival.
| S-EPMC6378013 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Brain metastasis was a common metastasis site and leading cause of death in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors had improved survival of NSCLC patients with positive drive gene. It also brings good news to NSCLC patients with positive drive gene and brain metastases. However, there is still no effective treatment for NSCLC patients with drive gene-negative and brain metastases. In recent years, immunotherapy has made breakthrough progress and become important first and second line treatment options of NSCLC especially in patients with drive gene-negative. The role of immunotherapy in specific populations of NSCLC-brain metastasis patients, especially drive gene-negative patients has become the focus of attention. In this report, we review the research progress of immunotherapy in NSCLC with brain metastases, especially in driver-negative patients, analyze the limitations of existing research and future challenge.?.
| S-EPMC6105354 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDacomitinib is a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) which is superior to first-generation EGFR TKI in ARCHER 1050. However, the activity of dacomitinib in the central nervous system (CNS) is not known as ARCHER 1050 did not include patients with baseline brain metastases. This study aimed to describe dacomitinib's activity in the CNS in a real-world setting.Patients and methodsThirty-two patients who were receiving dacomitinib for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations and brain metastasis were included in this study. Patients who received prior EGFR TKIs were excluded from this trial. Case report forms were collected to determine treatment outcomes.ResultsAmong 32 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and brain disease, eight were included in the CNS evaluable for response group. The intracranial objective response rate (iORR) was 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.3-99.7%) and the intracranial disease control rate (iDCR) was 100% (95% CI 63.1-100%). In 30 evaluable patients with measurable or nonmeasurable brain lesions, the iORR was 66.7% (95% CI 47.2-82.7%) and the iDCR was 100% (95% CI 88.4-100%). Median intracranial duration of response (iDoR) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) were not reached, with a one-year iDoR rate of 72.2% (95% CI 48.7-95.7%) and a 1-year iPFS rate of 71.2% (95% CI 51.0-91.4%), respectively. The majority of patients experienced low-grade (G1/2) toxicities, which are reversible.ConclusionThis study suggests that dacomitinib demonstrated CNS efficacy in patients with EGFR TKI-naïve EGFR-mutated NSCLC in the real-world setting. The safety profile was tolerable and manageable.
| S-EPMC8671892 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Median survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases is poor. We examined concurrent erlotinib and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) followed by maintenance erlotinib in patients with untreated brain metastases, given the potential radiosensitizing properties of erlotinib and its direct effect on brain metastases and systemic activity.Eighty NSCLC patients with KPS of 70 and greater and multiple brain metastases were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 40) or erlotinib (100mg, n = 40) given concurrently with WBRT (20 Gy in 5 fractions). Following WBRT, patients continued with placebo or erlotinib (150 mg) until disease progression. The primary end point was neurological progression-free survival (nPFS); hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox regression. All P values were two-sided.Fifteen patients (37.5%) from each arm were alive and without neurological progression 2 months after WBRT. Median nPFS was 1.6 months in both arms; nPFS HR 0.95 (95% CI = 0.59 to 1.54; P = .84). Median overall survival (OS) was 2.9 and 3.4 months in the placebo and erlotinib arms; HR 0.95 (95% CI = 0.58 to 1.55; P = .83). The frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations was low with only 1 of 35 (2.9%) patients with available samples had activating EGFR-mutations. Grade 3/4 adverse event rates were similar between the two groups (70.0% in each arm), except for rash 20.0% (erlotinib) vs 5.0% (placebo), and fatigue 17.5% vs 35.0%. No statistically significant quality of life differences were found.Our study showed no advantage in nPFS or OS for concurrent erlotinib and WBRT followed by maintenance erlotinib in patients with predominantly EGFR wild-type NSCLC and multiple brain metastases compared to placebo. Future studies should focus on the role of erlotinib with or without WBRT in patients with EGFR mutations.
| S-EPMC4112798 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Brain metastases from solid tumors are increasing in incidence, especially as outcomes of systemic therapies continue to extend patients' overall survival. The long-held notion that the brain is an immune sanctuary has now been largely refuted with increasing evidence that immunotherapy can induce durable responses in brain metastases. Single agent immune checkpoint inhibition with anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 antibodies induces durable responses in 15%-20% in melanoma brain metastases as long as patients are asymptomatic and do not require corticosteroids. The combination of anti-CTLA4 with anti-PD-1 antibodies induces an intracranial response in over 50% of asymptomatic melanoma patients, and much lower rate of otherwise durable responses (20%) in symptomatic patients or those on steroids. Data in other cancers, such as renal cell carcinoma, are accumulating indicating a role for immunotherapy. Emerging immunotherapy approaches will have to focus on increasing response rates, decreasing toxicity, and decreasing steroid dependency. The path to those advances will have to include a better understanding of the mechanisms of response and resistance to immunotherapy in brain metastases, the use of novel agents such as anti-LAG3 checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapy (oncogene directed or TKIs), and possibly surgery and SRS to improve the outcomes of patients with brain metastases.
| S-EPMC8633738 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThis study investigates the immune profile of the primary lung tumors and the corresponding brain metastasis from patients with NSCLC using multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry.MethodsThe study evaluated 34 patients who underwent autopsy or surgical resection for brain metastasis and autopsy, surgical resection, or core biopsy for primary lung cancer. We compared the densities of various immune cells in the primary tumors and the brain metastases by multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemical analysis.ResultsThe density of CD4-positive (CD4+) T-cells, CD8-positive T-cells, and CD4+ Foxp3-positive T-cells were statistically higher in both tumor and stromal areas in primary lung cancer specimens when compared with brain metastases samples (p < 0.0001). Only CD204-positive cells were statistically higher in the tumor areas of the brain metastases (p = 0.0118). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes associated with brain metastases positively correlated with overall survival, but primary lung tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes did not. The density of CD4+ and CD4+ Foxp3-positive T-cells in brain metastases with radiation was statistically higher in the carcinoma and stromal areas compared with those without radiation (p = 0.0343, p = 0.0173).ConclusionsOur findings that CD204-positive cells were higher in brain metastases may have broader implications for treatment as these macrophages may be immunosuppressive and make the immune environment less reactive. Furthermore, the finding that the density of CD4+ T-cells was higher in cancer and stroma areas of brain metastases after radiotherapy supports the addition of immunotherapy to radiation therapy in the treatment of brain metastases in NSCLC.
| S-EPMC8501504 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6987335 | biostudies-literature
Project description:RNA-Seq analyses of various cancers have identified thousands of target genes that help guide clinical treatment. By using RNA-Seq analysis, we examined primary lung tumors from NSCLC patients with and without BM to identify differentially-expressed genes and potential signaling pathways in two groups. A total of 6 patients with histopathologically confirmed NSCLC (against AJCC criteria) were enrolled in the RNA-Seq study, 3 patients with BM and other 3 without BM. All the cancer tissues used in this study were taken from surgical specimens and biopsies, and preserved immediately in liquid nitrogen after surgery. Totally, 566 differentially-expressed genes between BM+ and BM- samples were identified by DESeq2 with log2Fold Change being more than 2 and P value of statistical test less than 0.05, 326 genes were significantly down-regulated and 240 genes were up-regulated in BM+ group.
2019-02-19 | GSE126548 | GEO
Project description:Until very few years ago, the oncology community dogmatically excluded any clinical potential for immunotherapy in controlling brain metastases. Therefore, despite the significant therapeutic efficacy of monoclonal antibodies to immune check-point(s) across a wide range of tumor types, patients with brain disease were invariably excluded from clinical trials with these agents. Recent insights on the immune landscape of the central nervous system, as well as of the brain tumor microenvironment, are shedding light on the immune-biology of brain metastases.Interestingly, retrospective analyses, case series, and initial prospective clinical trials have recently investigated the role of different immune check-point inhibitors in brain metastases, reporting a significant clinical activity also in this subset of patients. These findings, and their swift translation in the daily practice, are driving fundamental changes in the clinical management of patients with brain metastases, and raise important neuroradiologic challenges. Along this line, neuro-oncology undoubtedly represents an additional area of active investigation and of growing interest to support medical oncologists in the evaluation of clinical responses of brain metastases to ICI treatment, and in the management of neurologic immune-related adverse events.Aim of this review is to summarize the most recent findings on brain metastases immunobiology, on the evolving scenario of clinical efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with brain metastases, as well as on the increasing relevance of neuroradiology in this therapeutic setting.
| S-EPMC6798349 | biostudies-literature