Dataset Information

Development of a Prognostic Alternative Splicing Signature Associated With Tumor Microenvironment Immune Profiles in Lung Adenocarcinoma

ABSTRACT:

Background

Alternative splicing (AS), a pivotal post-transcriptional process across more than 95% of human transcripts, is involved in transcript structural variations and protein complexity. Clinical implications of AS events and their interaction with tumor immunity were systematically analyzed in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).

Methods

Transcriptome profiling as well as AS data of LUAD were retrospectively curated. Then, the network of the overall survival (OS)-relevant AS events with splicing factors was established. After screening OS-relevant AS events, a LASSO prognostic model was conducted and evaluated with ROC curves. A nomogram that integrated independent prognostic indicators was created. Immune response and immune cell infiltration were estimated with ESTIMATE, CIBERSORT, and ssGSEA algorithms. Drug sensitivity was inferred with pRRophetic package.

Results

In total, 2415 OS-relevant AS events were identified across LUAD patients. The interaction network of splicing factors with OS-relevant AS events uncovered the underlying regulatory mechanisms of AS events in LUAD. Thereafter, a prognostic model containing 12 AS events was developed, which acted as a reliable and independent prognostic indicator following verification. A nomogram that constituted stage and risk score displayed great effectiveness in evaluating the survival likelihood. Moreover, the AS-based prognostic model was in relation to immune response and immune cell infiltration. Patients with a high-risk score displayed therapeutic superiority to cisplatin, erlotinib, gefitinib, and gemcitabine. Finally, three AS-relevant genes (CDKN2A, TTC39C, and PKIB) were identified as prognostic markers.

Conclusion

Collectively, our findings developed an AS event signature with powerful prognostic predictive efficacy in LUAD.

SUBMITTER: Bao G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9271776 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAlternative splicing (AS) is a gene regulatory mechanism that drives protein diversity. Dysregulation of AS is thought to play an essential role in cancer initiation and development. This study aimed to construct a prognostic signature based on AS and explore the role in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in lung adenocarcinoma.MethodsWe analyzed transcriptome profiling and clinical lung adenocarcinoma data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and lists of AS-related and immune-related signatures from the SpliceSeq. Prognosis-related AS events were analyzed by univariate Cox regression analysis. Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) were performed for functional annotation. Prognostic signatures were identified and validated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression, LASSO regression, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, and proportional hazards model. The context of TIME in lung adenocarcinoma was also analyzed. Gene and protein expression data of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) were obtained from ONCOMINE and Human Protein Atlas. Splicing factor (SF) regulatory networks were visualized.ResultsA total of 19,054 survival-related AS events in lung adenocarcinoma were screened in 1,323 genes. Exon skip (ES) and mutually exclusive exons (ME) exhibited the most and fewest AS events, respectively. Based on AS subtypes, eight AS prognostic signatures were constructed. Patients with high-risk scores were associated with poor overall survival. A nomogram with good validity in prognostic prediction was generated. AUCs of risk scores at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.775, 0.736, and 0.759, respectively. Furthermore, the prognostic signatures were significantly correlated with TIME diversity and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related genes. Low-risk patients had a higher StromalScore, ImmuneScore, and ESTIMATEScore. AS-based risk score signature was positively associated with CD8+ T cells. CDKN2A was also found to be a prognostic factor in lung adenocarcinoma. Finally, potential functions of SFs were determined by regulatory networks.ConclusionTaken together, our findings show a clear association between AS and immune cell infiltration events and patient outcome, which could provide a basis for the identification of novel markers and therapeutic targets for lung adenocarcinoma. SF networks provide information of regulatory mechanisms.

Project description:Background: Immune and stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) significantly contribute to the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma; however, the TME-related immune prognostic signature is unknown. The aim of this study was to develop a novel immune prognostic model of the TME in lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: First, the immune and stromal scores among lung adenocarcinoma patients were determined using the ESTIMATE algorithm in accordance with The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Differentially expressed immune-related genes (IRGs) between high and low immune/stromal score groups were analyzed, and a univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify IRGs significantly correlated with overall survival (OS) among patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was performed to generate TME-related immune prognostic signatures. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed to analyze the mechanisms underlying these immune prognostic signatures. Finally, the functions of hub IRGs were further analyzed to delineate the potential prognostic mechanisms in comprehensive TCGA datasets. Results: In total, 702 intersecting differentially expressed IRGs (589 upregulated and 113 downregulated) were screened. Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that 58 significant differentially expressed IRGs were correlated with patient prognosis in the training cohort, of which three IRGs (CLEC17A, INHA, and XIRP1) were identified through LASSO regression analysis. A robust prognostic model was generated on the basis of this three-IRG signature. Furthermore, functional enrichment analysis of the high-risk-score group was performed primarily on the basis of metabolic pathways, whereas analysis of the low-risk-score group was performed primarily on the basis of immunoregulation and immune cell activation. Finally, hub IRGs CLEC17A, INHA, and XIRP1 were considered novel prognostic biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma. These hub genes had different mutation frequencies and forms in lung adenocarcinoma and participated in different signaling pathways. More importantly, these hub genes were significantly correlated with the infiltration of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, macrophages, B cells, and neutrophils. Conclusions: The robust novel TME-related immune prognostic signature effectively predicted the prognosis of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Further studies are required to further elucidate the regulatory mechanisms of these hub IRGs in the TME and to develop new treatment strategies.