Project description:ObjectivesTo study the effect of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery on voice quality in patients with pituitary lesions.MethodsAn observational study comparing voice quality before and after surgery was conducted between September 2015 and September 2017 at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Pituitary tumor patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery were recruited. The nasal corridors were created with a type I (preserving both middle turbinates with a rescue flap) or type II (cutting one middle turbinate with a raised nasoseptal flap) for the binostril with four-hand technique. All patients were evaluated for nasal resonance, acoustic parameters, acoustic perception, and self-assessment of their satisfaction with postoperative voice changes with a visual analog scale (VAS). The patients were evaluated 1 day before surgery and at 1 and 3 months after surgery.ResultsForty-four patients, including 19 males and 25 females with a mean age of 50.0 ± 15.6 years, were enrolled. Mean scores for nasal resonance and all acoustic parameters were not significantly changed after surgery for either nasal corridor type (p > .05). Regarding acoustic perception, word and sentence and GIRBAS scores showed no significant difference before and after surgery (p > .09) in either type of nasal corridor. There was no incidence of hypernasality voice after surgery. Patients' self-satisfaction ratings (i.e., VAS) with voice quality were high and showed no significant change 1 and 3 months postsurgery (p > .05).ConclusionsThese endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approaches are minimally invasive skull base surgery techniques that have minimal effects on postsurgery voice quality.Trial registrationThis trial was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT02828514).Level of evidence4.
Project description:Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery is a promising alternative to transcranial approaches. However, standard instruments lack articulation, and thus, could benefit from robotic technologies. The aim of this study was to develop an ergonomic handle for a handheld robotic instrument intended to enhance this procedure. Two different prototypes were developed based on ergonomic guidelines within the literature. The first is a forearm-mounted handle that maps the surgeon's wrist degrees-of-freedom to that of the robotic end-effector; the second is a joystick-and-trigger handle with a rotating body that places the joystick to the position most comfortable for the surgeon. These handles were incorporated into a custom-designed surgical virtual simulator and were assessed for their performance and ergonomics when compared with a standard neurosurgical grasper. The virtual task was performed by nine novices with all three devices as part of a randomised crossover user-study. Their performance and ergonomics were evaluated both subjectively by themselves and objectively by a validated observational checklist. Both handles outperformed the standard instrument with the rotating joystick-body handle offering the most substantial improvement in terms of balance between performance and ergonomics. Thus, it is deemed the more suitable device to drive instrumentation for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery.
Project description:Purpose of the Review:Present an overview of perioperative considerations specific to endoscopic skull base surgery necessary to maximize successful outcomes. Recent Findings:The majority of perioperative considerations for endoscopic skull base surgery lack strong supporting evidence and frequently have varied use or implementation amongst institutions. A notable exception comes from a recent randomized controlled trial demonstrating the benefit of lumbar drainage in high-risk cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Summary:Skull base surgeons must consider a multitude of perioperative factors. While many components of perioperative management are extrapolated from related fields such as endoscopic sinus surgery or open cranial base surgery, additional high-quality studies are needed to delineate best practices specific to endoscopic skull base surgery.
Project description:Objectives Our laboratory is developing a surgical robotic system to further improve dexterity and visualization that will allow for broader application of transnasal skull base surgery. To optimize this system, intraoperative force data are required. Using a modified curette, force data were recorded and analyzed during pituitary tumor excision. Design A neurosurgical curette was modified by the addition of a force sensor. The instrument was validated in an in vitro model to measure forces during simulated pituitary tumor excision. Following this, intraoperative force data from three patients during transnasal endoscopic excision of pituitary tumors was obtained. Setting Academic medical center. Main Outcome Measures Forces applied at the skull base during surgical excision of pituitary tumors. Results Average forces applied during in vitro testing ranged from 0.1 to 0.15 N. Average forces recorded during in vivo testing ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 N. Maximal forces occurred with collisions of the bony sella. The average maximal force was 1.61 N. There were no complications related to the use of the modified curette. Conclusions Forces to remove pituitary tumor are small and are similar between patients. The in vitro model presented here is adequate for further testing of a robotic skull base surgery system.
Project description:Background Very few studies have examined vestibular schwannoma (VS) management trends across centers and between providers. The objective of this study is to examine current practice trends, variance in treatment philosophies, and nuanced or controversial aspects of VS care across North America. Methods This is a cross-sectional survey of North American Skull Base Society (NASBS) members who report regular involvement in VS care. Results A total of 57 completed surveys were returned. Most respondents claimed to have over 20 years of experience and the majority reported working in an academic practice with an affiliated otolaryngology and/or neurosurgery residency program. Sixty-three percent of respondents claimed to evaluate VS patients in clinic with both an otolaryngologist and neurosurgeon involved. Eighty-six percent of respondents claimed to operate on VS with both an otolaryngologist and neurosurgeon involved, while only 18% of neurosurgeons and 9% of otolaryngologists performed surgery alone. There was a wide range in the number of cases evaluated at each center annually. Similarly, there was wide variation in the number of patients treated with microsurgery and radiation at each center. Additional details regarding management preferences for microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, stereotactic radiotherapy, and conservative observation are presented. Conclusion VS management practices vary between providers and centers. Overall, most centers employ a multidisciplinary approach to management with collaboration between otolaryngology and neurosurgery. Overall, survey responses concur with previous studies suggesting a shift toward conservatism in management.
Project description:Introduction ?Perioperative care of vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients is extremely variable across surgeons and institutions making practice patterns difficult to standardize. No data currently exist detailing this practice variability. Methods ?The North American Skull Base Society membership was electronically surveyed regarding perioperative care of surgically operated VS patients. Results ?There were 87 respondents to the survey. Surgical positioning, surgical approach utilized, and perioperative medical adjuncts are quite variable. However, of those performing retrosigmoid approaches, 49% perform this in the supine position, while 33% use a park-bench position with only 2% using the sitting position. In those performing translabyrinthine approaches, 86% perform this in supine position. Although the use of neuromonitoring appears to be standard of care (98%), other than the seventh nerve, there is substantial variability between respondents regarding monitoring of additional cranial nerves. Postoperative antibiotics are used by 65%, postoperative steroids 81%, and postoperative chemical deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in 68% of survey respondents. Conclusion ?Although the perioperative adjuncts to VS surgery are variable, there does appear to be a trend in common practice. Therefore, making surgeons aware of these trends may lead to standardized practice or alternatively trials of these variances to instruct which truly improve patient outcomes.
Project description:Introduction Cushing's disease (CD) is associated with hypercoagulability which is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) perioperatively. This risk persists even after successful transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). However, there are no current guidelines for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in this patient population. Objective Characterize existing thromboprophylaxis management practices in patients undergoing TSS for CD. Methods An anonymous RedCap survey comprised of questions about perioperative thromboprophylaxis in CD patients was distributed via the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS)/Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) Joint Tumor Section and the North American Skull Base Society (NASBS) email lists. Results The survey was distributed to 554 members of the AANS/CNS Joint Tumor Section and 1,094 members of NASBS asking that members who surgically treat CD respond. Sixty responses (3.0% response rate) were received. Fifty-two (86.7%) respondents are involved in the postoperative management of CD patients. Thirty-six (69.2%) treat all patients with postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis, 8 (15.4%) treat some patients, while 8 (15.4%) do not use chemoprophylaxis. Preferred chemoprophylaxis varies as 26 (59.1%) administer low molecular weight heparin, 14 (31.8%) give unfractionated heparin, 1 (2.3%) give direct oral anticoagulants, and 3 (6.8%) give aspirin. Most (28, 53.8%) of the respondents perceive the VTE risk in this patient population to be 0 to 5%, 16 (30.8%) perceive the risk to be 6 to 10%, and 8 (15.4%) perceive it to be 11 to 20%. Conclusion There is great variability in VTE detection and postoperative prevention practice patterns in CD patients. This study highlights the need for prospective studies to clarify optimal pharmacologic chemoprophylaxis strategies and duration in this patient population.
Project description:Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS) requires high accuracy to ensure safe navigation of the critical anatomy at the anterior skull base. Current navigation systems provide approximately 2mm accuracy. This level of registration error is due in part from the indirect nature of tracking used. We propose a method to directly track the position of the endoscope using video data. Our method first reconstructs image feature points from video in 3D, and then registers the reconstructed point cloud to pre-operative data (e.g. CT/MRI). After the initial registration, the system tracks image features and maintains the 2D-3D correspondence of image features and 3D locations. These data are then used to update the current camera pose. We present registration results within 1mm, which matches the accuracy of our validation framework.
Project description:Skull base surgery has undergone significant progress following key technological developments. From early candle-lit devices to the modern endoscope, refinements in visualization techniques have made endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) a standard practice for treating a variety of conditions. The endoscope has also been integrated with other technologies to enhance visualization, including fluorescence agents, intraoperative neuronavigation with augmented reality, and the exoscope. Endoscopic approaches have allowed neurosurgeons to reevaluate skull base neuroanatomy from new perspectives. These advances now serve as the foundation for future developments in ESBS. In this narrative review, we discuss the history and development of ESBS, current visualization techniques, and future innovations.
Project description:BACKGROUND:Near-infrared (NIR) tumor contrast is achieved through the "second-window ICG" technique, which relies on passive accumulation of high doses of indocyanine green (ICG) in neoplasms via the enhanced permeability and retention effect. OBJECTIVE:To report early results and potential challenges associated with the application of second-window ICG technique in endonasal endoscopic, ventral skull-base surgery, and to determine potential predictors of NIR signal-to-background ratio (SBR) using endoscopic techniques. METHODS:Pituitary adenoma (n = 8), craniopharyngioma (n = 3), and chordoma (n = 4) patients received systemic infusions of ICG (5 mg/kg) approximately 24 h before surgery. Dual-channel endoscopy with visible light and NIR overlay were photodocumented and analyzed post hoc. RESULTS:All tumors (adenoma, craniopharyngioma, chordoma) demonstrated NIR positivity and fluoresced with an average SBR of 3.9 ± 0.8, 4.1 ± 1.7, and 2.1 ± 0.6, respectively. Contrast-enhanced T1 signal intensity proved to be the single best predictor of observed SBR (P = .0003). For pituitary adenomas, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of NIR-guided identification of tumor was 100%, 20%, 71%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION:In this preliminary study of a small set of patients, we demonstrate that second-window ICG can provide NIR optical tumor contrast in 3 types of ventral skull-base tumors. Chordomas demonstrated the weakest NIR signal, suggesting limited utility in those patients. Both nonfunctional and functional pituitary adenomas appear to accumulate ICG, but utility for margin detection for the adenomas is limited by low specificity. Craniopharyngiomas with third ventricular extension appear to be a particularly promising target given the clean brain parenchyma background and strong SBR.