Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibition in cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of 45 randomized controlled trials.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Safety concerns about proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors make physicians reluctant to prescribe agents for patients. The present aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of alirocumab, evolocumab and bococizumab in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

Methods

Medline, the Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for 45 randomized controlled trials, involving 97,297 patients.

Results

Compared with the control group, PCSK9 inhibitors could significantly reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Alirocumab was associated with lower incidence of unstable angina (p < 0.05) and myocardial infarction (p < 0.05), compared with the control group. Alirocumab (odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% conﬁdence interval [CI] 0.60-0.97, p < 0.05), evolocumab (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.95, p < 0.05) and bococizumab (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.84, p < 0.05) were associated with lower incidence of stroke, compared with control group. The incidence of injection-site reactions was significantly higher in alirocumab (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.45-1.93, p < 0.05), evolocumab (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.41-1.91, p < 0.05) and bococizumab (OR 8.03, 95% CI 6.85-9.41, p < 0.05) group than in the control group.

Conclusions

Alirocumab and evolocumab could ameliorate lipid profile and reduce the risk of cardiac disorders and stroke with satisfactory safety and tolerability. However, injection-site reactions should be paid attention to.

SUBMITTER: Geng Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9273234 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) about Ezetimibe's efficacy on patient-oriented outcomes have given discordant results. The aim of this study was to determine the net effect of Ezetimibe and of the widely marketed combination, Ezetimibe+simvastatin, on mortality and morbidity outcomes.We searched for RCT on Ezetimibe using MEDLINE, CCTR, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov databases up to December 2013, Merck and Novartis online registers, and personal communications. Two authors independently selected trials fulfilling these criteria: RCTs comparing Ezetimibe±statin or another lipid-lowering drug against placebo, or against the same lipid-lowering drug at the same dosage, with a follow-up at least 24 weeks and one or more of these outcomes: all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), cancer, serious adverse events (SAEs); we assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane checklist. We extracted the data for major clinical events as a dichotomous measure, with the patient the unit of analysis. Pooled analysis was done with random and fixed effect based models. Trials comparing Ezetimibe plus a lipid-lowering drug against the same lipidlowering drug representing the net effect of Ezetimibe, showed a nonsignificant tendency toward damage for cancer, MI, stroke and SAEs. Ezetimibe+simvastatin vs. simvastatin alone showed a stronger tendency towards a higher risk for all-cause death (2.52; 0.65-9.74), CV death (3.04; 0.48-19.21), non-CV death (3.03; 0.12-73.50), MI (1.91; 0.42-8.70), stroke (2.38; 0.46-12.35), cancer (RR 11.11; 0.62-198.29), and SAEs (1.45; 0.95-2.23). Limitations include small numbers of events and inadequate power of the pooling. Trials comparing Ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo showed non-significant effects: MI (0.81; 0.66-1.00 p = 0.051), all-cause death (1.02; 0.95-1.09), CV death (0.91; 0.80-1.04), non-CV death (108; 0.99-1.18), stroke (0.86; 0.72-1.04), cancer (1.18; 0.80-1.74), SAEs (1.01; 0.96-1.06).Ezetimibe±simvastatin had inconsistent effects on important outcomes. No firm conclusions are possible, but findings indicative of damage suggest much more selective use of Ezetimibe±simvastatin.

Project description:BackgroundPatients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are characterized with high risk of heart failure. Although mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have beneficial effect on relieving cardiac fibrosis and, thus, reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease and cardiac death, the therapeutic benefits and adverse effects are still controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to measure the safety and efficacy of spironolactone in patients undergoing dialysis.MethodsA systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Primary outcomes included changes in all-cause mortality (ACM), serum potassium concentration, incidence of hyperkalemia and gynecomastia (GYN). Secondary outcomes included changes in blood pressure (BP), left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were further conducted. This research was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; No. CRD42021287493).ResultsFifteen RCTs with 1,258 patients were enrolled in this pooled-analysis. Spironolactone treatment significantly decreased ACM (RR = 0.42, P < 0.0001), CCV (RR = 0.54, P = 0.008) and LVMI (MD = -6.28, P = 0.002), also increased occurrence of GYN (RR = 4.36, P = 0.0005). However, LVEF (MD = 2.63, P = 0.05), systolic BP (MD = -4.61, P = 0.14) and diastolic BP (MD = -0.12, P = 0.94) did not change between two groups after treatment. Although serum potassium concentration was increased (MD = 0.22, P < 0.0001) after spironolactone supplement, the risk of hyperkalemia remained unchanged (RR = 1.21, P = 0.31). Further subgroup analysis found more obvious advantageous as well as disadvantageous effects in Asian subjects than European or American ones. Also, with more than 9 months of treatment duration, patients achieved more favorable influence than shorter duration.ConclusionsThese results highlight the therapeutic effects of spironolactone on cardiovascular indexes, including ACM, CCV, and LVMI. However, the unignorable increase of GYN incidence and serum potassium level indicate that close monitor in dialysis-dependent patients, especially Asian patients, is essential.