Dataset Information

Relating psychiatric symptoms and self-regulation during the COVID-19 crisis.

ABSTRACT: Disruptions of self-regulation are a hallmark of numerous psychiatric disorders. Here, we examine the relationship between transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology and changes in self-regulation in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. We used a data-driven approach on a large number of cognitive tasks and self-reported surveys in training datasets. Then, we derived measures of self-regulation and psychiatric functioning in an independent population sample (N = 102) tested both before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, when the restrictions in place represented a threat to mental health and forced people to flexibly adjust to modifications of daily routines. We found independent relationships between transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology and longitudinal alterations in specific domains of self-regulation defined using a diffusion decision model. Compared to the period preceding the onset of the pandemic, a symptom dimension related to anxiety and depression was characterized by a more cautious behavior, indexed by the need to accumulate more evidence before making a decision. Instead, social withdrawal related to faster non-decision processes. Self-reported measures of self-regulation predicted variance in psychiatric symptoms both concurrently and prospectively, revealing the psychological dimensions relevant for separate transdiagnostic dimensions of psychiatry, but tasks did not. Taken together, our results are suggestive of potential cognitive vulnerabilities in the domain of self-regulation in people with underlying psychiatric difficulties in face of real-life stressors. More generally, they also suggest that the study of cognition needs to take into account the dynamic nature of real-world events as well as within-subject variability over time.

SUBMITTER: Vaghi MM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9274960 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportancePsychiatric boarding occurs when patients needing intensive psychiatric services who are already under clinical supervision experience delays in their admission to psychiatric facilities. Initial reports have suggested that the US had a psychiatric boarding crisis during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, little is known about the consequences of this crisis for publicly insured youths.ObjectiveTo estimate pandemic-associated changes in psychiatric boarding rates and discharge modalities for people aged 4 to 20 years who accessed psychiatric emergency services (PES) through a mobile crisis team (MCT) evaluation and were covered by Medicaid or health safety net programs.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cross-sectional study used data from the MCT encounters of a multichannel PES program in Massachusetts. A total of 7625 MCT-initiated PES encounters with publicly insured youths who lived in Massachusetts between January 1, 2018, and August 31, 2021, were assessed.Main outcomes and measuresEncounter-level outcomes (psychiatric boarding status, repeat visits, and discharge disposition) during a prepandemic period (January 1, 2018, to March 9, 2020) were compared with outcomes during a pandemic period (March 10, 2020, to August 31, 2021). Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analysis were used.ResultsAmong 7625 MCT-initiated PES encounters, the mean (SD) age of publicly insured youths was 13.6 (3.7) years; most youths identified as male (3656 [47.9%]), were of Black race (2725 [35.7%]) or Hispanic ethnicity (2708 [35.5%]), and spoke English (6941 [91.0%]). During the pandemic period, the mean monthly boarding encounter rate was 25.3 percentage points higher than the prepandemic period. After adjustment for covariates, the odds of an encounter resulting in boarding doubled during the pandemic (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.03; 95% CI, 1.82-2.26; P < .001), and boarding youths were 64% less likely to be discharged to inpatient psychiatric care (AOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.31-0.43; P < .001). Publicly insured youths who boarded during the pandemic had significantly higher rates of 30-day readmissions (incidence rate ratio, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.88-2.50; P < .001). Boarding encounters during the pandemic were significantly less likely to end in discharge to inpatient psychiatric units (AOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.31-0.43; P < .001) or community-based acute treatment facilities (AOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.90; P = .005).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cross-sectional study, publicly insured youths were more likely to experience psychiatric boarding during the COVID-19 pandemic and, if boarding, were less likely to transfer to a 24-hour level of care. These findings suggest that psychiatric service programs for youths were not prepared to support the levels of acuity and demand that emerged from the pandemic.

Dataset Information

Relating psychiatric symptoms and self-regulation during the COVID-19 crisis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets