Dataset Information

Total circulating microRNA level as an independent prognostic marker for risk stratification in breast cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Although breast cancer (BC) has a high survival rate, relapse events may occur which ultimately lead to aggressive disease. Circulating cell-free microRNAs (cf-miRNAs) are a promising minimally invasive biomarker with diagnostic and/or prognostic potential. Unfortunately, there is still no consensus as to a universal cf-miRNA biomarker in BC and there has been no clinical implementation until now. One major limitation is the technical variation with cf-miRNA isolation and specific quantification methods.

Methods

In this study, we assessed the total levels of cf-miRNAs as a potential prognostic marker for BC in 356 plasma samples from 250 BC patients.

Results

High levels of cf-miRNAs significantly correlated with unfavourable clinical features including tumour stage, load and the presence of metastasis at diagnosis. With more than 9 years of follow-up, we could show that global cf-miRNA levels significantly correlated with cancer relapse which was confirmed in multivariate cox regression analysis. Finally, for a subset of patients where the serial plasma was available, levels of cf-miRNAs increased in the plasma prior to clinical detection of progressive disease and were massively elevated in patients who died compared to those still alive at the last timepoint of measurement.

Conclusions

This is the first study to suggest that total cf-miRNA levels in the blood can be used as an independent prognostic marker for BC.

SUBMITTER: Gahlawat AW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9276748 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAberrant expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) is associated with cancer progression, initiation and metastasis. MiR34a is a miRNA that has been previously described as a tumour suppressor. Herein, we assess the expression of miR34a in three independent breast cancer cohorts using a quantitative in situ hybridisation assay (qISH) and determined its association with disease-specific death in breast cancer.MethodsThe qISH method was applied to three independent primary breast cancer cohorts (Cohort 1 with 461, Cohort 2 with 279 and Cohort 3 with 795 patients) using 5' and 3' double DIG-labelled LNA-modified probe against miR34a using the protocol described previously. Level of expression measured as automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) score for miR34a was determined for each patient and assessed for association with risk of disease-specific death. An optimal cutpoint was determined using the X-tile software for disease-specific survival in Cohort 1 and this cutpoint was then applied to the other two cohorts after median normalisation of AQUA scores.ResultsLoss of miR34a is associated with poor outcome in three independent breast cancer cohorts (uncorrected log-rank P=0.0188 for Cohort 1, log-rank P=0.0024 for Cohort 2 and log-rank P=0.0455 for Cohort 3). In all three cohorts, loss of miR34a is able to stratify patients with poor disease-specific survival among node-negative patients, but not in node-positive population. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis in Cohort 1 (P=0.0381) and Cohort 2 (P=0.0468) revealed that loss of miR34a is associated with poor outcome, independent of age, node status, receptor status and tumour size.ConclusionLoss of the tumour suppressor, miR34a, identifies a subgroup of breast cancer patients with poor disease-specific survival. This study is consistent with the well-established preclinical observations for miR34a as a tumour suppressor and suggests that miR34a may have future value as a biomarker in breast cancer.

Project description:BackgroundA number of protein markers have been investigated as prognostic adjuncts in breast cancer but their translation into clinical practice has been impeded by a lack of appropriate validation. Recently, we showed that BCL2 protein expression had prognostic power independent of current used standards. Here, we present the results of a meta-analysis of the association between BCL2 expression and both disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in female breast cancer.MethodsReports published in 1994-2006 were selected for the meta-analysis using a search of PubMed. Studies that investigated the role of BCL2 expression by immunohistochemistry with a sample size greater than 100 were included. Seventeen papers reported the results of 18 different series including 5,892 cases with an average median follow-up of 92.1 months.ResultsEight studies investigated DFS unadjusted for other variables in 2,285 cases. The relative hazard estimates ranged from 0.85 - 3.03 with a combined random effects estimate of 1.66 (95%CI 1.25 - 2.22). The effect of BCL2 on DFS adjusted for other prognostic factors was reported in 11 studies and the pooled random effects hazard ratio estimate was 1.58 (95%CI 1.29-1.94). OS was investigated unadjusted for other variables in eight studies incorporating 3,910 cases. The hazard estimates ranged from 0.99-4.31 with a pooled estimate of risk of 1.64 (95%CI 1.36-2.0). OS adjusted for other parameters was evaluated in nine series comprising 3,624 cases and the estimates for these studies ranged from 1.10 to 2.49 with a pooled estimate of 1.37 (95%CI 1.19-1.58).ConclusionThe meta-analysis strongly supports the prognostic role of BCL2 as assessed by immunohistochemistry in breast cancer and shows that this effect is independent of lymph node status, tumour size and tumour grade as well as a range of other biological variables on multi-variate analysis. Large prospective studies are now needed to establish the clinical utility of BCL2 as an independent prognostic marker.

Project description:BackgroundCurrently, there is no reliable blood-based marker to track tumor recurrence in endometrial cancer (EC) patients. Liquid biopsies, specifically, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis emerged as a way to monitor tumor metastasis. The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility of ctDNA in recurrence surveillance and prognostic evaluation of high-risk EC.MethodsTumor tissues from nine high-risk EC patients were collected during primary surgery and tumor DNA was subjected to next generation sequencing to obtain the initial mutation spectrum using a 78 cancer-associated gene panel. Baseline and serial post-operative plasma samples were collected and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays for patient-specific mutations were developed to track the mutations in the ctDNA in serial plasma samples. Log-rank test was used to assess the association between detection of ctDNA before or after surgery and disease-free survival.ResultsSomatic mutations were identified in all of the cases. The most frequent mutated genes were PTEN, FAT4, ARID1A, TP53, ZFHX3, ATM, and FBXW7. For each patient, personalized ddPCR assays were designed for one-to-three high-frequent mutations. DdPCR analysis and tumor panel sequencing had a high level of agreement in the assessment of the mutant allele fractions in baseline tumor tissue DNA. CtDNA was detected in 67% (6 of 9) of baseline plasma samples, which was not predictive of disease-free survival (DFS). CtDNA was detected in serial post-operative plasma samples (ctDNA tracking) of 44% (4 of 9) of the patients, which predicted tumor relapse. The DFS was a median of 9 months (ctDNA detected) versus median DFS undefined (ctDNA not detected), with a hazard ratio of 17.43 (95% CI, 1.616-188.3). The sensitivity of post-operative ctDNA detection in estimating tumor relapse was 100% and specificity was 83.3%, which was superior to CA125 or HE4.ConclusionsPersonalized ctDNA detection was effective and stable for high-risk EC. CtDNA tracking in post-operative plasma is valuable for predicting tumor recurrence.

Project description:BackgroundPolygenic risk scores (PRS) could potentially improve breast cancer screening recommendations. Before a PRS can be considered for implementation, it needs rigorous evaluation, using performance measures that can inform about its future clinical value.ObjectivesTo evaluate the prognostic performance of a regression model with a previously developed, prevalence-based PRS and age as predictors for breast cancer incidence in women from the Estonian biobank (EstBB) cohort; to compare it to the performance of a model including age only.MethodsWe analyzed data on 30,312 women from the EstBB cohort. They entered the cohort between 2002 and 2011, were between 20 and 89 years, without a history of breast cancer, and with full 5-year follow-up by 2015. We examined PRS and other potential risk factors as possible predictors in Cox regression models for breast cancer incidence. With 10-fold cross-validation we estimated 3- and 5-year breast cancer incidence predicted by age alone and by PRS plus age, fitting models on 90% of the data. Calibration, discrimination, and reclassification were calculated on the left-out folds to express prognostic performance.ResultsA total of 101 (3.33‰) and 185 (6.1‰) incident breast cancers were observed within 3 and 5 years, respectively. For women in a defined screening age of 50-62 years, the ratio of observed vs PRS-age modelled 3-year incidence was 0.86 for women in the 75-85% PRS-group, 1.34 for the 85-95% PRS-group, and 1.41 for the top 5% PRS-group. For 5-year incidence, this was respectively 0.94, 1.15, and 1.08. Yet the number of breast cancer events was relatively low in each PRS-subgroup. For all women, the model's AUC was 0.720 (95% CI: 0.675-0.765) for 3-year and 0.704 (95% CI: 0.670-0.737) for 5-year follow-up, respectively, just 0.022 and 0.023 higher than for the model with age alone. Using a 1% risk prediction threshold, the 3-year NRI for the PRS-age model was 0.09, and 0.05 for 5 years.ConclusionThe model including PRS had modest incremental performance over one based on age only. A larger, independent study is needed to assess whether and how the PRS can meaningfully contribute to age, for developing more efficient screening strategies.

Project description:ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine the level of serum FGF21 in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to explore the association between serum FGF21 and major adverse cardiovascular events in AMI patients.MethodsA total of 238 Chinese patients were recruited for this study between January 2016 and June 2016, including 183 AMI patients and 55 patients without AMI were enrolled in this study. The level of serum FGF21 was measured by ELISA. Patients were followed-up after admission using a standardized protocol that included Outpatient follow-up and telephone contacts to record the Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACEs). Finally, 165 patients were enrolled and followed up during the period of 24 months.ResultsCirculating FGF21 level was elevated in the AMI patients compared to control (P < 0.05). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that cTnI (? = -0.001, 95% CI = 0.021-0.001, P = 0.002), fibrinogen (? = -0.055, 95% CI = 0.098-0.013, P = 0.011) and hyperlipidemia (? = 0.129, 95% CI = 0.014-0.243, P = 0.011) were the independent risk factors for the serum of FGF21 in AMI patients. After follow-up, A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the all-cause mortality rate was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.4146). Meanwhile the rate of cardiovascular events was significantly higher in the high-FGF21 group than in the low-FGF21 group (P = 0.0399). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model suggested that the predictive independent risk factors for the occurrence of MACEs were FGF21 ? cut-off (HR: 1.637; 95% CI: 1.357-3.647, P = 0.029) and D-Dimer (HR: 1.420; 95% CI: 1.069-3.014, P = 0.046).ConclusionCirculating FGF21 level is elevated in the AMI patients. In AMI patients, cTnI, fibrinogen and hyperlipidemia are the inde pendent risk factors for the serum of FGF21. Higher circulating FGF21 level is associated with increased MACEs rate. This study suggests that circulating FGF21 level may be a predictive marker of the clinical outcomes in AMI patients.