Dataset Information

Evaluation of automatic tube current modulation of CT scanners using a dedicated and the CTDI dosimetry phantoms.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To investigate the operation principles of the automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) of a CT scanner, using a dedicated phantom and the CT dosimetry index (CTDI) phantom.

Material and methods

The Mercury 4.0 phantom and three different configurations of the CTDI dosimetry phantom were employed. A frequently used clinical scanning protocol was employed as a basis for the acquisitions performed with all phantoms, using both scanning directions. Additional acquisitions with different pitch and examination protocols were performed with Mercury phantom, to further explore their effect on ATCM and the resulting image quality. Different software named DICOM Info Extractor, ImageJ, and imQuest, were used to derive CTDI_vol and table position, image noise, and water equivalent diameter (WED) of each phantom CT image, respectively. ImQuest was also used to derive the detectability index (d') of five different materials (air, solid water, polystyrene, iodine, and bone) embedded in the Mercury phantom.

Results

It was exhibited with all four phantoms that the scanning direction greatly affects the modulation curves. The fitting of the dose modulations curves suggested that for each table position what determines the CTDI_vol value is the WED values of the phantom structures laying ahead towards the scanning direction, for a length equal to the effective width of the X-ray beam. Furthermore, it was also exhibited that ATCM does not fully compensate for larger thicknesses, since images of larger WED phantom sections present more noise (larger SD) in all four phantoms and in Mercury 4.0 phantom smaller detectability (d').

Conclusion

Mercury 4.0 is a dedicated phantom for a complete and in-depth evaluation of the ATCM operation and the resulting image quality. However, in its absence, different CTDI configurations can be used as an alternative to investigate and comprehend some basic operation principles of the CT scanners' ATCM systems.

SUBMITTER: Tsalafoutas IA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9278667 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The study was aimed to evaluate the image quality and radiation dose during female chest computed tomography (CT) screening using organ-based tube current modulation technology X-ray combined applications to reduce exposure (XCARE).Five hundred sixty female individuals undergoing chest CT scan were prospectively enrolled and divided into 4 groups based on body mass index (BMI). Then they were randomly and equally divided into control and experimental subgroup and respectively accepted conventional low-dose and XCARE technology spiral CT scan with same parameters. Signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated. The quality of the images was evaluated by 2 radiologists using a 5-point scale.Among experimental subgroups of the 4 BMI groups, Signal-to-noise ratios, CT dose index of volume, dose-length product, effective dose, and contrast-to-noise ratio all displayed significant differences, as well as in control subgroups (P < .001). Both the experimental and control subgroups showed an increasing trend in radiation dose with the increasing of BMI. Parameters of image quality and radiation dose displayed no significant differences between control and experimental subgroups in the 4 groups. In multiple linear regression analysis, age and scanning protocol were not associated with radiation dose (P > .05), while BMI was significantly associated with increased CT dose index of volume (P < .05). The display of the lesions for the patients in the control and experimental subgroups of the 4 groups with different BMIs exhibited no statistically significant difference.The same image quality and radiation dose can be obtained using XCARE technology compared to conventional chest CT scans, which can be used regularly in female patients.Advances in knowledge: Using automatic tube current modulation technology to reduce exposure in breast. In this study, we sought a radiation protection method for sensitive tissue in chest CT screening.

Project description:PurposeA clinical-prototype, dedicated, cone-beam breast computed tomography (CBBCT) system with offset detector is undergoing clinical evaluation at our institution. This study is to estimate the normalized glandular dose coefficients ( DgNCT ) that provide air kerma-to-mean glandular dose conversion factors using Monte Carlo simulations.Materials and methodsThe clinical prototype CBBCT system uses 49 kV x-ray spectrum with 1.39 mm 1st half-value layer thickness. Monte Carlo simulations (GATE, version 8) were performed with semi-ellipsoidal, homogeneous breasts of various fibroglandular weight fractions ( fg=0.01,0.15,0.5,1) , chest wall diameters ( d=8,10,14,18,20 cm), and chest wall to nipple length ( l=0.75d ), aligned with the axis of rotation (AOR) located at 65 cm from the focal spot to determine the DgNCT . Three geometries were considered - 40×30 -cm detector with no offset that served as reference and corresponds to a clinical CBBCT system, 30×30 -cm detector with 5 cm offset, and a 30×30 -cm detector with 10 cm offset.ResultsFor 5 cm lateral offset, the DgNCT ranged 0.177-0.574 mGy/mGy and reduction in DgNCT with respect to reference geometry was observed only for 18 cm ( 6.4%±0.23% ) and 20 cm ( 9.6%±0.22% ) diameter breasts. For the 10 cm lateral offset, the DgNCT ranged 0.221-0.581 mGy/mGy and reduction in DgNCT was observed for all breast diameters. The reduction in DgNCT was 1.4%±0.48% , 7.1%±0.13% , 17.5%±0.19% , 25.1%±0.15% , and 27.7%±0.08% for 8, 10, 14, 18, and 20 cm diameter breasts, respectively. For a given breast diameter, the reduction in DgNCT with offset-detector geometries was not dependent on fg . Numerical fits of DgNCTd,l,fg were generated for each geometry.ConclusionThe DgNCT and the numerical fit, DgNCTd,l,fg would be of benefit for current CBBCT systems using the reference geometry and for future generations using offset-detector geometry. There exists a potential for radiation dose reduction with offset-detector geometry, provided the same technique factors as the reference geometry are used, and the image quality is clinically acceptable.

Project description:Most methods to estimate patient dose from computed tomography (CT) exams have been developed based on fixed tube current scans. However, in current clinical practice, many CT exams are performed using tube current modulation (TCM). Detailed information about the TCM function is difficult to obtain and therefore not easily integrated into patient dose estimate methods. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of organ dose estimates obtained using methods that approximate the TCM function using more readily available data compared to estimates obtained using the detailed description of the TCM function.Twenty adult female models generated from actual patient thoracic CT exams and 20 pediatric female models generated from whole body PET∕CT exams were obtained with IRB (Institutional Review Board) approval. Detailed TCM function for each patient was obtained from projection data. Monte Carlo based models of each scanner and patient model were developed that incorporated the detailed TCM function for each patient model. Lungs and glandular breast tissue were identified in each patient model so that organ doses could be estimated from simulations. Three sets of simulations were performed: one using the original detailed TCM function (x, y, and z modulations), one using an approximation to the TCM function (only the z-axis or longitudinal modulation extracted from the image data), and the third was a fixed tube current simulation using a single tube current value which was equal to the average tube current over the entire exam. Differences from the reference (detailed TCM) method were calculated based on organ dose estimates. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated between methods after testing for normality. Equivalence test was performed to compare the equivalence limit between each method (longitudinal approximated TCM and fixed tube current method) and the detailed TCM method. Minimum equivalence limit was reported for each organ.Doses estimated using the longitudinal approximated TCM resulted in small differences from doses obtained using the detailed TCM function. The calculated root-mean-square errors (RMSE) for adult female chest simulations were 9% and 3% for breasts and lungs, respectively; for pediatric female chest and whole body simulations RMSE were 9% and 7% for breasts and 3% and 1% for lungs, respectively. Pearson's correlation coefficients were consistently high for the longitudinal approximated TCM method, ranging from 0.947 to 0.999, compared to the fixed tube current value ranging from 0.8099 to 0.9916. In addition, an equivalence test illustrated that across all models the longitudinal approximated TCM is equivalent to the detailed TCM function within up to 3% for lungs and breasts.While the best estimate of organ dose requires the detailed description of the TCM function for each patient, extracting these values can be difficult. The presented results show that an approximation using available data extracted from the DICOM header provides organ dose estimates with RMSE of less than 10%. On the other hand, the use of the overall average tube current as a single tube current value was shown to result in poor and inconsistent estimates of organ doses.