Dataset Information

Novel Plasma Proteomic Biomarkers for Early Identification of Induction Chemotherapy Beneficiaries in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

ABSTRACT:

Background

Induction chemotherapy (IC) can alleviate locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC), but effectiveness differs between patients, toxicity is problematic, and effective blood-based IC efficacy predictors are lacking. Here, we aimed to identify biomarkers for early identification of IC beneficiaries.

Methods

Sixty-four pairs of matched plasma samples collected before and after IC from LA-NPC patients including 34 responders and 30 non-responders, as well as 50 plasma samples of healthy individuals, were tested using data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. The proteins associated with clinical traits or IC benefits were investigated by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and soft cluster analysis. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes functional annotations were performed to determine the potential function of the identified proteins. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of candidate biomarkers in predicting IC beneficiaries.

Results

Compared with healthy individuals, 1027 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were found in the plasma of LA-NPC patients. Based on feedback from IC outcomes, 463 DEPs were identified in the pre-IC plasma between responders and non-responders. A total of 1212 DEPs represented the proteomic changes before and after IC in responders, while 276 DEPs were identified in post-IC plasma between responders and non-responders. WGCNA identified nine protein co-expression modules correlated with clinical traits. Soft cluster analysis identified four IC benefits-related protein clusters. Functional enrichment analysis showed that these proteins may play a role in IC via immunity, complement, coagulation, glycosaminoglycan and serine. Four proteins differentially expressed in all group comparisons, paraoxonase/arylesterase 1 (PON1), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), rheumatoid factor D5 light chain (v-kappa-3) and RNA helicase (DDX55), were associated with clinical traits or IC benefits. A four-protein model accurately identified potential IC beneficiaries (AUC=0.95) while diagnosing LA-NPC (AUC=0.92), and the prediction performance was verified using the models to confirm the effective IC (AUC=0.97) and evaluate IC outcome (AUC=0.94).

Conclusion

The plasma protein profiles among IC responders and non-responders were different. PON1, IGFBP3, v-kappa-3 and DDX55 could serve as potential biomarkers for early identification of IC beneficiaries for individualised treatment of LA-NPC.

SUBMITTER: Zhang S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9279567 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundInduction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for non-metastatic locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has gained considerable attention. However, the most efficacious IC regimens remain investigational. We aimed to compare the survival benefits of all available IC regimens followed by CCRT in this network meta-analysis.MethodsAll randomized-controlled trials of CCRT with or without IC in non-metastatic locoregionally advanced NPC were included, with an overall nine trials of 2,705 patients counted in the analysis. CCRT alone was the reference category. Eight IC regimens followed by CCRT were analyzed: docetaxel + cisplatin (DC), gemcitabine + carboplatin + paclitaxel (GCP), gemcitabine + cisplatin (GP), mitomycin + epirubicin + cisplatin + fluorouracil + leucovorin (MEPFL), cisplatin + epirubicin + paclitaxel (PET), cisplatin + fluorouracil (PF), cisplatin + capecitabine (PX) and cisplatin + fluorouracil (PF), cisplatin + capecitabine (PX). Fixed-effects frequentist network meta-analysis models was applied and P-score was used to rank the treatments.ResultsDC, GP, and PX were the top three IC regimens with the highest probability of benefit on overall survival (OS). Their corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) (95% CIs) compared with CCRT alone were of 0.24 (0.08-0.73), 0.43 (0.24-0.77), and 0.54 (0.27-1.09) and the respective P-scores were 94%, 82%, and 68%. The first three IC regimens showing significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) were PX, followed by GP and DC with respective HRs of 0.46 (0.24-0.88), 0.51 (0.34-0.77), and 0.49 (0.20-1.20), and P-scores of 82%, 78%, and 74%. Among the studies in the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) era, GP and PX were the best performed IC regimens, whilst DC performed the best among non-IMRT studies. Doublet and gemcitabine-based IC regimens had better survival benefits compared to triplet and taxane-based IC regimens, respectively.ConclusionsGiven its consistent superiority in both OS and PFS, DC, GP, and PX ranked among the three most efficacious IC regimens in both the overall and subgroup analysis of IMRT or non-IMRT studies. Exploratory analyses suggested that doublet and gemcitabine-based IC regimens showed better survival performance.

Project description:PurposeThis large population-based analysis aims to investigate whether the additional induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LRANPC).Patients and methodsThe study group comprised 3,980 patients who were treated either with IC+CCRT (1,888 patients) or CCRT alone (2,092 patients) between January 1998 and June 2013. Survival outcomes were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression models with adjustments for confounding provided by propensity score methods. Primary outcome variables included OS and DFS.ResultsKaplan-Meier analysis showed that CCRT and IC+CCRT were of similar benefit to OS (P=0.099), whereas there was a marginal benefit of CCRT to DFS (P=0.063) in the overall cohort, which showed no differences between the two treatment regimens using multivariate Cox analysis and propensity score. Interestingly, for patients with 2D radiationtherapy (2DRT), CCRT had OS and DFS benefits for stage III, with 5-year and 10-year OS for CCRT vs IC+CCRT being 88% and 75% vs 81% and 67%, respectively (P=0.002); 5-year and 10-year DFS for CCRT vs IC+CCRT being 84% and 74% vs 76% and 66%, respectively (P=0.002). In contrast, IC + CCRT had OS and DFS benefits for stage IVa-b, with 5-year and 10-year OS for CCRT vs IC+CCRT being 71% and 55% vs 76% and 60%, respectively (P=0.037, HR=0.786); 5-year and 10-year DFS for CCRT vs IC+CCRT were 64% and 50% vs 69% and 58%, respectively (P=0.038, HR=0.801). No difference was found in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) subgroup.ConclusionOur study indicates that CCRT and IC+CCRT may have similar OS and DFS benefits for overall LRANPC. Stage-specific chemoradiotherapy may be administered based on the greatest benefit of IC+CCRT for stage IVa-b patients and CCRT alone for stage III patients received 2DRT. The optimal chemotherapy pattern in combination with IMRT needs further investigation.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02604472.