Dataset Information

Relationship between ATOH1 and tumor microenvironment in colon adenocarcinoma patients with different microsatellite instability status

ABSTRACT:

Background

Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) is one of the major varieties of malignant tumors threatening human health today. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently begun to emerge as an effective option for the treatment of COAD patients, but not all patients can benefit from ICI treatment. Previous studies have suggested that ICIs boast significant clinical effects on patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), while conversely patients with microsatellite-stable/microsatellite instability-low (MSS/MSI-L) have shown limited response.

Methods

We used ATAC-seq, RNA-seq, and mutation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas Colon adenocarcinoma (TCGA-COAD) cohort to perform multi-omics differential analysis on COAD samples with different MSI statuses, then further screened genes by additionally combining these results with survival analysis. We analyzed the effects of the screened genes on the tumor microenvironment and immunogenicity of COAD patients, and subsequently determined their influence on the efficacy of ICIs in COAD patients using a series of predictive indexes.

Results

Twelve genes were screened in the TCGA-COAD cohort, and after the combined survival analysis, we identified ATOH1 as having significant effects. ATOH1 is characterized by high chromatin accessibility, high expression, and high mutation in COAD patients in the MSI-H group. COAD patients with high ATOH1 expression are associated with a better prognosis, unique immune microenvironment, and higher efficacy in ICI treatment. Enrichment analysis showed that COAD patients with high ATOH1 expression displayed significant upregulation in their humoral immunity and other related pathways.

Conclusions

We speculate that ATOH1 may influence the efficacy of ICIs therapy in patients with COAD by affecting the immune microenvironment and immunogenicity of the tumor.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-022-02651-6.

SUBMITTER: Mou W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9281179 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTumor sidedness as a prognostic factor in advanced stage colon cancer (CC) is well established. The impact of tumor sidedness on the clinical outcomes of stage II and III CC has not been well studied.MethodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was utilized to identify patients with pathological stage II and III primary adenocarcinoma of the colon from 2010 to 2015 using ICD-O-3 morphology and topography codes: 8140-47, 8210-11, 8220-21, 8260-63, 8480-81, 8490 and C18.0, 18.2,18.3, 18.5,18.6, 18.7. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) survival analyses and Kaplan-Meier Curves with Log-rank test were utilized to compare overall survival (OS) based on tumor location and treatment received.ResultsA total of 35,071 patients with stage II (n = 17,629) and III (n = 17,442) CC were identified. 51.3% female; 81.5% Caucasian; median age 66 (range, 18-90). Majority of stage II and III tumors were right sided, 61.2% (n = 10,794) and 56.0% (n = 9,763). Microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) was more common in stage II compared to III, 23.3% (n = 4,115) vs 18.2% (n = 3,171) (p < 0.0001). In stage II MSI-H CC right was more common than left, 78.3% (n = 3223) vs 21.7% (n = 892). There was no significant difference in survival between stage II MSI-H left vs right (5-year OS 76.2 vs 74.7%, p = 0.1578). Stage II MSS CC right was more common than left, 56.0% (n = 7571) vs 44.0% (n = 5943), and survival was better in the left vs right (5-year OS 73.2 vs 70.8%, p = 0.0029). Stage III MSI-H CC was more common in the right than in the left, 75.6% (n = 2,397) vs 24.4% (n = 774) and survival was better in the left (5-year OS 62.5 vs 56.5%, p = 0.0026). Stage III MSS CC was more common in the right than in the left, 51.6% (n = 7,366) vs 48.4% (n = 6,905), and survival was better in the left vs right (5-year OS 67.0 vs 54.4%, p < 0.001).ConclusionSurvival was better in left sided tumors compared to right in stage II MSS, stage III MSS, and stage III MSI-H CC.