Dataset Information

Nucleic acid amplification tests reduce delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

ABSTRACT: The clinical impact of nucleic acid amplification (NAA) tests on reducing delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of pulmonary TB (PTB) has rarely been investigated. PTB patients were classified into a frontline NAA group, an add-on NAA group, and a no NAA group. The outcomes of interest were the proportion of PTB case died before anti-TB treatment, the interval between sputum examination and initiation of treatment, and misdiagnosis of PTB. A total of 2192 PTB patients were enrolled, including 282 with frontline NAA, 717 with add-on NAA, and 1193 with no NAA tests. Patients with NAA tests had a lower death rate before treatment initiation compared to those without NAA tests (1.6% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001) in all cases. Patients with frontline NAA compared to those with add-on NAA and those without NAA, had a shorter interval between sputum examination and treatment initiation in all cases (3 days vs. 6 days (p < 0.001), vs 18 days (p < 0.001)), and less misdiagnosis in smear-positive cases (1.8% vs. 5.6% (p = 0.039), vs 6.5% (p = 0.026)). In conclusion, NAA tests help prevent death before treatment initiation. Frontline NAA tests perform better than add-on NAA and no NAA in avoiding treatment delay in all cases, and misdiagnosis of PTB in smear-positive cases.

SUBMITTER: Feng JY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9283405 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Nucleic acid amplification tests reduce delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Feng Jia-Yih JY Lin Chou-Jui CJ Wang Jann-Yuan JY Chien Shun-Tien ST Lin Chih-Bin CB Huang Wei-Chang WC Lee Chih-Hsin CH Shu Chin-Chung CC Yu Ming-Chih MC Lee Jen-Jyh JJ Chiang Chen-Yuan CY

Scientific reports 20220714 1

The clinical impact of nucleic acid amplification (NAA) tests on reducing delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of pulmonary TB (PTB) has rarely been investigated. PTB patients were classified into a frontline NAA group, an add-on NAA group, and a no NAA group. The outcomes of interest were the proportion of PTB case died before anti-TB treatment, the interval between sputum examination and initiation of treatment, and misdiagnosis of PTB. A total of 2192 PTB patients were enrolled, including 282 w ...[more]

PMID: 35835940

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSmear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is common and difficult to diagnose. In this study, we investigated the diagnostic value of nucleic acid amplification testing and sequencing combined with acid-fast bacteria (AFB) staining of needle biopsy lung tissues for patients with suspected smear-negative PTB.MethodsPatients with suspected smear-negative PTB who underwent percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy between May 1, 2012, and June 30, 2015, were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients with AFB in sputum smears were excluded. All lung biopsy specimens were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, and subjected to acid-fast staining and tuberculous polymerase chain reaction (TB-PCR). For patients with positive AFB and negative TB-PCR results in lung tissues, probe assays and 16S rRNA sequencing were used for identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of PCR and AFB staining were calculated separately and in combination.ResultsAmong the 220 eligible patients, 133 were diagnosed with TB (men/women: 76/57; age range: 17-80 years, confirmed TB: 9, probable TB: 124). Forty-eight patients who were diagnosed with other specific diseases were assigned as negative controls, and 39 patients with indeterminate final diagnosis were excluded from statistical analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of histological AFB (HAFB) for the diagnosis of smear-negative were 61.7% (82/133), 100% (48/48), 100% (82/82), 48.5% (48/181), and 71.8% (130/181), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of histological PCR were 89.5% (119/133), 95.8% (46/48), 98.3% (119/121), and 76.7% (46/60), respectively, demonstrating that histological PCR had significantly higher accuracy (91.2% [165/181]) than histological acid-fast staining (71.8% [130/181]), P < 0.001. Parallel testing of histological AFB staining and PCR showed the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy to be 94.0% (125/133), 95.8% (46/48), 98.4% (125/127), 85.2% (46/54), and 94.5% (171/181), respectively. Among patients with positive AFB and negative PCR results in lung tissue specimens, two were diagnosed with NTM infections (Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex and Mycobacterium kansasii).ConclusionNucleic acid amplification testing combined with acid-fast staining in lung biopsy tissues can lead to early and accurate diagnosis in patients with smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. For patients with positive histological AFB and negative tuberculous PCR results in lung tissue, NTM infection should be suspected and could be identified by specific probe assays or 16S rRNA sequencing.

Project description:The Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) remains one of the top 10 leading causes of death globally. The early diagnosis of MTBC can reduce mortality and mitigate disease transmission. However, current nucleic acid amplification diagnostic test methods are generally time-consuming and show suboptimal diagnostic performance, especially in extrapulmonary MTBC samples or acid-fast stain (AFS)-negative cases. Thus, development of an accurate assay for the diagnosis of MTBC is necessary, particularly under the above mentioned conditions. In this study, a single-tube nested real-time PCR assay (N-RTP) was developed and compared with a newly in-house-developed high-sensitivity real-time PCR assay (HS-RTP) using 134 clinical specimens (including 73 pulmonary and 61 extrapulmonary specimens). The amplification efficiency of HS-RTP and N-RTP was 99.8% and 100.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of HS-RTP and N-RTP for the diagnosis of MTBC in these specimens were 97.5% (77/79) versus 94.9% (75/79) and 80.0% (44/55) versus 89.1% (49/55), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of HS-RTP and N-RTP for the diagnosis of MTBC in pulmonary specimens were 96.3% (52/54) versus 96.3% (52/54) and 73.7.0% (14/19) versus 89.5% (17/19), respectively; in extrapulmonary specimens, the sensitivity and specificity of HS-RTP and N-RTP were 100% (25/25) versus 92% (23/25) and 83.3% (30/36) versus 88.9% (32/36), respectively. Among the AFS-negative cases, the sensitivity and specificity of HS-RTP and N-RTP were 97.0% (32/33) versus 90.9% (30/33) and 88.0% (44/50) versus 92.0% (46/50), respectively. Overall, the sensitivity of HS-RTP was higher than that of N-RTP, and the performance was not compromised in extrapulmonary specimens and under AFS-negative conditions. In contrast, the specificity of the N-RTP assay was higher than that of the HS-RTP assay in all types of specimens. In conclusion, the HS-RTP assay would be useful for screening patients suspected of exhibiting an MTBC infection due to its higher sensitivity, while the N-RTP assay could be used for confirmation because of its higher specificity. Our results provide a two-step method (screen to confirm) that simultaneously achieves high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of MTBC.

Project description:BackgroundManagement and control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) relies on reliable diagnostic testing.ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for the diagnosis of coronavirus infections.Data sourcesPubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Open Grey and conference proceeding until May 2019. PubMed and medRxiv were updated for COVID-19 on 31st August 2020.Study eligibilityStudies were eligible if they reported on agreement rates between different NAATs using clinical samples.ParticipantsSymptomatic patients with suspected upper or lower respiratory tract coronavirus infection.MethodsThe new NAAT was defined as the index test and the existing NAAT as reference standard. Data were extracted independently in duplicate. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Confidence regions (CRs) surrounding summary sensitivity/specificity pooled by bivariate meta-analysis are reported. Heterogeneity was assessed using meta-regression.ResultsFifty-one studies were included, 22 of which included 10 181 persons before COVID-19 and 29 including 8742 persons diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The overall summary sensitivity was 89.1% (95%CR 84.0-92.7%) and specificity 98.9% (95%CR 98.0-99.4%). Nearly all the studies evaluated different PCRs as both index and reference standards. Real-time RT PCR assays resulted in significantly higher sensitivity than other tests. Reference standards at high risk of bias possibly exaggerated specificity. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of studies evaluating SARS-COV-2 were 90.4% (95%CR 83.7-94.5%) and 98.1% (95%CR 95.9-99.2), respectively. SARS-COV-2 studies using samples from the lower respiratory tract, real-time RT-PCR, and tests targeting the N or S gene or more than one gene showed higher sensitivity, and assays based on reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), especially when targeting only the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene, showed significantly lower sensitivity compared to other studies.ConclusionsPooling all studies to date shows that on average 10% of patients with coronavirus infections might be missed with PCR tests. Variables affecting sensitivity and specificity can be used for test selection and development.

Dataset Information

Nucleic acid amplification tests reduce delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Publications

Nucleic acid amplification tests reduce delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets