Dataset Information

Allogeneic transplantation of epidermal cell sheets followed by endoscopic submucosal dissection to prevent severe esophageal stricture in a porcine model.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive treatment for early esophageal cancer. However, large mucosal defects after esophageal ESD result in refractory strictures. In the present study, we histologically evaluated the endoscopic transplantation of allogeneic epidermal cell sheets (ECSs) as a feasible therapy for preventing esophageal stricture after circumferential ESD in a porcine model.

Methods

Epidermal cells were isolated from the skin tissue of allogeneic pigs and cultured on temperature-responsive cell culture inserts for 2 weeks. Transplantable ECSs were harvested by reducing the temperature and endoscopically transplanting the sheets to ulcer sites immediately after esophageal ESD. The engraftment of transplanted ECSs was then evaluated in two pigs at 7 days after transplantation. Next, ten pigs were divided into two groups to evaluate the endoscopic transplantation of allogeneic ECSs for the prevention of esophageal strictures after ESD. Allogeneic ECSs were transplanted immediately after esophageal ESD in the transplantation group (n = 5), whereas the control group (n = 5) did not undergo transplantation.

Results

Most of the transplanted allogeneic ECSs were successfully engrafted at the ulcer sites in the early phase. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed that several allogeneic cells were present in the transplanted area at 7 days after ESD. At 14 days after ESD, significant differences in body weight loss, dysphagia scores, and mucosal strictures were observed between the control and transplantation groups. Transplanting allogeneic ECSs after esophageal ESD promotes mucosal healing and angiogenesis and prevents excessive inflammation and granulation tissue formation.

Conclusions

Endoscopic and histological analyses revealed that allogeneic ECSs promoted artificial ulcer healing after ESD, preventing esophageal strictures after ESD.

SUBMITTER: Kobayashi S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9284451 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Widespread endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in early esophageal cancer patients is closely associated with esophageal stricture, which dramatically reduces patients' quality of life and increases huge medical burdens. Endoscopic injection of steroid was proved as a protective method for post-ESD strictures. Other materials such as botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) may be potential candidates. We conducted this prospective cohort study to compare the efficacy and feasibility of endoscopic injection of BTX-A and triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for the prevention of esophageal stricture. Methods: Seventy-eight patients with esophageal mucosal defects of more than two thirds of the circumference were successively enrolled and divided into 3 groups: BTX-A group (group A, n=26), TA group (group B, n=16) and control group (group C, n=36). Patients in group A were immediately injected with BTX-A after ESD, in group B were immediately injected with TA and in group C received ESD only. Endoscopy was performed when patients reported dysphagia symptoms and at 6 and 12 weeks post-ESD in patients without symptoms. Patients who experienced post-ESD esophageal strictures in all groups received bougie dilation. All patients were followed up for one year. Results: The proportion of patients developing stricture in BTX-A group was 30.00% (intention to treat analysis, 9/30) and 26.92% (per protocol analysis, 7/26), in TA group was 40.90% (intention to treat analysis, 9/22) and 43.75% (per protocol analysis, 7/16), and in control group was 84.21% (intention to treat analysis, 32/38) and 83.33% (per protocol analysis, 30/36) (p<0.001). When further comparing between each of the two groups, the incidence of esophageal stricture was lower in BTX-A group than that in control group (p<0.001), and lower in TA group than that in control group (p=0.004). Furthermore, in entire circumference mucosal defect subgroup, the esophageal stricture was significantly lower in BTX-A group than that in TA group (33.3% vs 100%, p=0.0454). Conclusions: Endoscopic injection of BTX-A and TA were effective in preventing post-ESD esophageal strictures and BTX-A injection was particularly effective in entire circumference mucosal defect patients. Multi-centered, randomized prospective study with larger sample size should be conducted. (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2100042970, registered 1 February 2021, retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/listbycreater.aspx).

Project description:BackgroundEsophageal stricture is a major complication of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with superficial esophageal cancer (SEC). Oral steroids have been used to prevent esophageal stricture in patients with more than 75% of the esophageal circumference resected. However, there are no established guidelines regarding the optimal duration of steroid use. This retrospective observational study aimed to compare the incidence of esophageal stricture according to the period of prophylactic oral steroid use and to identify the risk factors for esophageal stricture.MethodsEighty-one patients who were prescribed prophylactic steroid after undergoing ESD for SEC with more than 75% of esophageal circumference resected were enrolled. Patients were classified into the four-week steroid group (n=72) or eight-week steroid group (n=9) to compare the incidence of esophageal stricture. In addition, the patients were subdivided into those who developed esophageal stricture (n=24) and those who did not (n=57) to identify the risk factors for esophageal stricture.ResultsTwenty patients (27.8%) in the four-week oral steroid group and four patients (44.4%) in the eight-week oral steroid group developed esophageal stricture (P=0.44). The univariable analysis identified tumor size, longitudinal length of semi-circumferential resection, and proportion of circumferential resection as risk factors of esophageal stricture. The multivariable analysis identified the proportion of circumferential resection as an independent risk factor. After adjusting for the proportion of circumferential resection, the incidence of stricture was marginally higher in the eight-week steroid group [P=0.05; odds ratio (OR): 5.69; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-32.15].ConclusionsEight weeks of oral steroid prophylaxis does not reduce the risk of stricture after extensive ESD more than four weeks of oral steroid prophylaxis. The proportion of circumferential resection is the strongest risk factor for stricture in patients with SEC undergoing ESD.