Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Working toward improved monitoring of Cryptosporidium and Giardia (oo)cysts in water samples: testing alternatives to elution and immunomagnetic separation from USEPA Method 1623.1.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

This study was designed to find a method to enhance the recovery of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. parasites from water samples for research purposes compared to the results that can be achieved with USEPA Method 1623.1. Four different approaches were used to test water samples that were artificially spiked with parasites. The approaches were: (i) Method 1623.1 itself, (ii) elution of Method 1623.1 combined with microfiltration, (iii) an elution technique based on grinding the filter membrane in a blender before the eluent was concentrated by immunomagnetic separation, and (iv) the blender elution followed by microfiltration. Fluorescence microscopy was used to determine which approach led to the highest parasite recovery rates.

Results

Method 1623.1 gave the best results for Giardia, while all four approaches were statistically equivalent for Cryptosporidium. We evaluated the costs and laboratory time requirements for each protocol to give readers a complete comparison of the methods tested. Elution of Method 1623.1 combined with microfiltration resulted in lower costs and less laboratory work time without compromising the recovery of the parasites.

SUBMITTER: Fradette MS 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9284717 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Working toward improved monitoring of Cryptosporidium and Giardia (oo)cysts in water samples: testing alternatives to elution and immunomagnetic separation from USEPA Method 1623.1.

Fradette Marie-Stéphanie MS   Charette Steve J SJ  

BMC research notes 20220715 1


<h4>Objective</h4>This study was designed to find a method to enhance the recovery of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. parasites from water samples for research purposes compared to the results that can be achieved with USEPA Method 1623.1. Four different approaches were used to test water samples that were artificially spiked with parasites. The approaches were: (i) Method 1623.1 itself, (ii) elution of Method 1623.1 combined with microfiltration, (iii) an elution technique based on grindi  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7500626 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4730487 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3147453 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1538719 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3365325 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4524145 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC194950 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC546695 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC168707 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC91515 | biostudies-literature