Dataset Information

MRI-guided attenuation correction in torso PET/MRI: Assessment of segmentation-, atlas-, and deep learning-based approaches in the presence of outliers.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

We compare the performance of three commonly used MRI-guided attenuation correction approaches in torso PET/MRI, namely segmentation-, atlas-, and deep learning-based algorithms.

Methods

Twenty-five co-registered torso ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MR images were enrolled. PET attenuation maps were generated from in-phase Dixon MRI using a three-tissue class segmentation-based approach (soft-tissue, lung, and background air), voxel-wise weighting atlas-based approach, and a residual convolutional neural network. The bias in standardized uptake value (SUV) was calculated for each approach considering CT-based attenuation corrected PET images as reference. In addition to the overall performance assessment of these approaches, the primary focus of this work was on recognizing the origins of potential outliers, notably body truncation, metal-artifacts, abnormal anatomy, and small malignant lesions in the lungs.

Results

The deep learning approach outperformed both atlas- and segmentation-based methods resulting in less than 4% SUV bias across 25 patients compared to the segmentation-based method with up to 20% SUV bias in bony structures and the atlas-based method with 9% bias in the lung. The deep learning-based method exhibited superior performance. Yet, in case of sever truncation and metallic-artifacts in the input MRI, this approach was outperformed by the atlas-based method, exhibiting suboptimal performance in the affected regions. Conversely, for abnormal anatomies, such as a patient presenting with one lung or small malignant lesion in the lung, the deep learning algorithm exhibited promising performance compared to other methods.

Conclusion

The deep learning-based method provides promising outcome for synthetic CT generation from MRI. However, metal-artifact and body truncation should be specifically addressed.

SUBMITTER: Arabi H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9292636 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Deep convolutional neural networks have demonstrated robust and reliable PET attenuation correction (AC) as an alternative to conventional AC methods in integrated PET/MRI systems. However, its whole-body implementation is still challenging due to anatomical variations and the limited MRI field of view. The aim of this study is to investigate a deep learning (DL) method to generate voxel-based synthetic CT (sCT) from Dixon MRI and use it as a whole-body solution for PET AC in a PET/MRI system. Materials and methods Fifteen patients underwent PET/CT followed by PET/MRI with whole-body coverage from skull to feet. We performed MRI truncation correction and employed co-registered MRI and CT images for training and leave-one-out cross-validation. The network was pretrained with region-specific images. The accuracy of the AC maps and reconstructed PET images were assessed by performing a voxel-wise analysis and calculating the quantification error in SUV obtained using DL-based sCT (PETsCT) and a vendor-provided atlas-based method (PETAtlas), with the CT-based reconstruction (PETCT) serving as the reference. In addition, region-specific analysis was performed to compare the performances of the methods in brain, lung, liver, spine, pelvic bone, and aorta. Results Our DL-based method resulted in better estimates of AC maps with a mean absolute error of 62 HU, compared to 109 HU for the atlas-based method. We found an excellent voxel-by-voxel correlation between PETCT and PETsCT (R2 = 0.98). The absolute percentage difference in PET quantification for the entire image was 6.1% for PETsCT and 11.2% for PETAtlas. The regional analysis showed that the average errors and the variability for PETsCT were lower than PETAtlas in all regions. The largest errors were observed in the lung, while the smallest biases were observed in the brain and liver. Conclusions Experimental results demonstrated that a DL approach for whole-body PET AC in PET/MRI is feasible and allows for more accurate results compared with conventional methods. Further evaluation using a larger training cohort is required for more accurate and robust performance. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-022-00486-8.

Project description:Respiratory motion causes misalignments between positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance (MR)-derived attenuation maps (µ-maps) in addition to artifacts on both PET and MR images in simultaneous PET/MRI for organs such as liver that can experience motion of several centimeters. To address this problem, we developed an efficient MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC) method to generate phase-matched µ-maps for quiescent period PET (PETQ) in abdominal PET/MRI. MRAC data was acquired with CIRcular Cartesian UnderSampling (CIRCUS) sampling during 100?s in free-breathing as an accelerated data acquisition strategy for phase-matched MRAC (MRACPM-CIRCUS). For comparison, MRAC data with raster (Default) k-space sampling was also acquired during 100?s in free-breathing (MRACPM-Default), and used to evaluate MRACPM-CIRCUS as well as un-matched MRAC (MRACUM) that was un-gated. We purposefully oversampled the MRACPM data to ensure we had enough information to capture all respiratory phases to make this comparison as robust as possible. The proposed MRACPM-CIRCUS was evaluated in 17 patients with 68Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/MRI exams, suspected of having neuroendocrine tumors or liver metastases. Effects of CIRCUS sampling for accelerating a data acquisition were evaluated by simulating the data acquisition time retrospectively in increments of 5?s. Effects of MRACPM-CIRCUS on PETQ were evaluated using uptake differences in the liver lesions (n??=??35), compared to PETQ with MRACPM-Default and MRACUM. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare lesion uptakes between the MRAC methods. MRACPM-CIRCUS showed higher image quality compared to MRACPM-Default for the same acquisition times, demonstrating that a data acquisition time of 30?s was reasonable to achieve phase-matched µ-maps. Lesion update differences between MRACPM-CIRCUS (30?s) versus MRACPM-Default (reference, 100?s) were 0.1%??±??1.4% (range of??-2.7% to 3.2%) and not significant (P??>??.05); while, the differences between MRACUM versus MRACPM-Default were 0.6%??±??11.4% with a large variation (range of??-37% to 20%) and significant (P??<??.05). In conclusion, we demonstrated that a data acquisition of 30?s achieved phase-matched µ-maps when using specialized CIRCUS data sampling and phase-matched µ-maps improved PETQ quantification significantly.

Project description:BackgroundThis study aims to compare proton density weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) zero echo time (ZTE) and head atlas attenuation correction (AC) to the reference standard computed tomography (CT) based AC for 11C-methionine positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI.MethodsA retrospective cohort of 14 patients with suspected or confirmed brain tumour and 11C-Methionine PET/MRI was included in the study. For each scan, three AC maps were generated: ZTE-AC, atlas-AC and reference standard CT-AC. Maximum and mean standardised uptake values (SUV) were measured in the hotspot, mirror region and frontal cortex. In postoperative patients (n?=?8), SUV values were additionally obtained adjacent to the metal implant and mirror region. Standardised uptake ratios (SUR) hotspot/mirror, hotspot/cortex and metal/mirror were then calculated and analysed with Bland-Altman, Pearson correlation and intraclass correlation reliability in the overall group and subgroups.ResultsZTE-AC demonstrated narrower SD and 95% CI (Bland-Altman) than atlas-AC in the hotspot analysis for all groups (ZTE overall???2.84, - 1.41 to 1.70; metal???1.67, - 3.00 to 2.20; non-metal???3.04, - 0.96 to 3.38; Atlas overall???4.56, - 1.05 to 3.83; metal???3.87, - 3.81 to 4.64; non-metal???4.90, - 1.68 to 5.86). The mean bias for both ZTE-AC and atlas-AC was???2.4% compared to CT-AC. In the metal region analysis, ZTE-AC demonstrated a narrower mean bias range-closer to zero-and narrower SD and 95% CI (ZTE 0.21-0.48,???2.50, - 1.70 to 2.57; Atlas 0.56-1.54,???4.01, - 1.81 to 4.89). The mean bias for both ZTE-AC and atlas-AC was within 1.6%. A perfect correlation (Pearson correlation) was found for both ZTE-AC and atlas-AC compared to CT-AC in the hotspot and metal analysis (ZTE ? 1.00, p?<?0.0001; atlas ? 1.00, p?<?0.0001). An almost perfect intraclass correlation coefficient for absolute agreement was found between Atlas-, ZTE and CT maps for maxSUR and meanSUR values in all the analyses (ICC?>?0.99).ConclusionsBoth ZTE and atlas-AC showed a good performance against CT-AC in patients with brain tumour.

Project description:We present a novel technique for accurate whole-body attenuation correction in the presence of metallic endoprosthesis, on integrated non-time-of-flight (non-TOF) PET/MRI scanners. The proposed implant PET-based attenuation map completion (IPAC) method performs a joint reconstruction of radioactivity and attenuation from the emission data to determine the position, shape, and linear attenuation coefficient (LAC) of metallic implants. Methods: The initial estimate of the attenuation map was obtained using the MR Dixon method currently available on the Siemens Biograph mMR scanner. The attenuation coefficients in the area of the MR image subjected to metal susceptibility artifacts are then reconstructed from the PET emission data using the IPAC algorithm. The method was tested on 11 subjects presenting 13 different metallic implants, who underwent CT and PET/MR scans. Relative mean LACs and Dice similarity coefficients were calculated to determine the accuracy of the reconstructed attenuation values and the shape of the metal implant, respectively. The reconstructed PET images were compared with those obtained using the reference CT-based approach and the Dixon-based method. Absolute relative change (aRC) images were generated in each case, and voxel-based analyses were performed. Results: The error in implant LAC estimation, using the proposed IPAC algorithm, was 15.7% ± 7.8%, which was significantly smaller than the Dixon- (100%) and CT- (39%) derived values. A mean Dice similarity coefficient of 73% ± 9% was obtained when comparing the IPAC- with the CT-derived implant shape. The voxel-based analysis of the reconstructed PET images revealed quantification errors (aRC) of 13.2% ± 22.1% for the IPAC- with respect to CT-corrected images. The Dixon-based method performed substantially worse, with a mean aRC of 23.1% ± 38.4%. Conclusion: We have presented a non-TOF emission-based approach for estimating the attenuation map in the presence of metallic implants, to be used for whole-body attenuation correction in integrated PET/MR scanners. The Graphics Processing Unit implementation of the algorithm will be included in the open-source reconstruction toolbox Occiput.io.

Project description:Several factors have to be considered for implementing an accurate attenuation-correction (AC) method in a combined MR-PET scanner. In this work, some of these challenges were investigated, and an AC method based entirely on the MRI data obtained with a single dedicated sequence was developed and used for neurologic studies performed with the MR-PET human brain scanner prototype.The focus was on the problem of bone-air segmentation, selection of the linear attenuation coefficient for bone, and positioning of the radiofrequency coil. The impact of these factors on PET data quantification was studied in simulations and experimental measurements performed on the combined MR-PET scanner. A novel dual-echo ultrashort echo time (DUTE) MRI sequence was proposed for head imaging. Simultaneous MR-PET data were acquired, and the PET images reconstructed using the proposed DUTE MRI-based AC method were compared with the PET images that had been reconstructed using a CT-based AC method.Our data suggest that incorrectly accounting for the bone tissue attenuation can lead to large underestimations (>20%) of the radiotracer concentration in the cortex. Assigning a linear attenuation coefficient of 0.143 or 0.151 cm(-1) to bone tissue appears to give the best trade-off between bias and variability in the resulting images. Not identifying the internal air cavities introduces large overestimations (>20%) in adjacent structures. On the basis of these results, the segmented CT AC method was established as the silver standard for the segmented MRI-based AC method. For an integrated MR-PET scanner, in particular, ignoring the radiofrequency coil attenuation can cause large underestimations (i.e., <or=50%) in the reconstructed images. Furthermore, the coil location in the PET field of view has to be accurately known. High-quality bone-air segmentation can be performed using the DUTE data. The PET images obtained using the DUTE MRI- and CT-based AC methods compare favorably in most of the brain structures.A DUTE MRI-based AC method considering all these factors was implemented. Preliminary results suggest that this method could potentially be as accurate as the segmented CT method and could be used for quantitative neurologic MR-PET studies.

Project description:BackgroundMRI does not offer a direct method to obtain attenuation correction maps as its predecessors (stand-alone PET and PET/CT), and bone visualisation is particularly challenging. Recently, zero-echo-time (ZTE) was suggested for MR-based attenuation correction (AC). The aim of this work was to evaluate ZTE- and atlas-AC by comparison to 68Ge-transmission scan-based AC. Nine patients underwent brain PET/MR and stand-alone PET scanning using the dopamine transporter ligand 11C-PE2I. For each of them, two AC maps were obtained from the MR images: an atlas-based, obtained from T1-weighted LAVA-FLEX imaging with cortical bone inserted using a CT-based atlas, and an AC map generated from proton-density-weighted ZTE images. Stand-alone PET 68Ge-transmission AC map was used as gold standard. PET images were reconstructed using the three AC methods and standardised uptake value (SUV) values for the striatal, limbic and cortical regions, as well as the cerebellum (VOIs) were compared. SUV ratio (SUVR) values normalised for the cerebellum were also assessed. Bias, precision and agreement were calculated; statistical significance was evaluated using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test.ResultsBoth ZTE- and atlas-AC showed a similar bias of 6-8% in SUV values across the regions. Correlation coefficients with 68Ge-AC were consistently high for ZTE-AC (r 0.99 for all regions), whereas they were lower for atlas-AC, varying from 0.99 in the striatum to 0.88 in the posterior cortical regions. SUVR showed an overall bias of 2.9 and 0.5% for atlas-AC and ZTE-AC, respectively. Correlations with 68Ge-AC were higher for ZTE-AC, varying from 0.99 in the striatum to 0.96 in the limbic regions, compared to atlas-AC (0.99 striatum to 0.77 posterior cortex).ConclusionsAbsolute SUV values showed less variability for ZTE-AC than for atlas-AC when compared to 68Ge-AC, but bias was similar for both methods. This bias is largely caused by higher linear attenuation coefficients in atlas- and ZTE-AC image compared to 68Ge-images. For SUVR, bias was lower when using ZTE-AC than for atlas-AC. ZTE-AC shows to be a more robust technique than atlas-AC in terms of both intra- and inter-patient variability.