Dataset Information

Development and validation of the dialysis dementia risk score: A retrospective, population-based, nested case-control study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Dementia is prevalent and underdiagnosed in the dialysis population. We aimed to develop and validate a simple dialysis dementia scoring system to facilitate identification of individuals who are at high risk for dementia.

Methods

We applied a retrospective, nested case-control study design using a national dialysis cohort derived from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Patients aged between 40 and 80 years were included and 2940 patients with incident dementia were matched to 29,248 non-dementia controls. All subjects were randomly divided into the derivation and validation sets with a ratio of 4:1. Conditional logistic regression models were used to identify factors contributing to the risk score. The cutoff value of the risk score was determined by Youden's J statistic and the graphic method.

Results

The dialysis dementia risk score (DDRS) finally included age and 10 comorbidities as risk predictors. The C-statistic of the model was 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.72). Calibration revealed a strong linear relationship between predicted and observed dementia risk (R² = 0.99). At a cutoff value of 50 points, the high-risk patients had an approximately three-fold increased risk of having dementia compared to those with low risk (odds ratio [OR] 3.03, 95% CI 2.78-3.31). The DDRS performance, including discrimination (C-statistic 0.71, 95% CI 0.69-0.73) and calibration (p value of Hosmer-Lemeshow test for goodness of fit = 0.18), was acceptable during validation. The OR value (2.82, 95% CI 2.37-3.35) was similar to those in the derivation set.

Conclusion

The DDRS system has the potential to serve as an easily accessible screening tool to determine the high-risk groups who deserve subsequent neurological evaluation in daily clinical practice.

SUBMITTER: Ling TC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9293339 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The distinction between sporadic and genetic behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) regarding some neuropsychological (NP) features remains challenging. Specifically, progranulin (GRN)-associated bvFTD frequently presents with early episodic memory impairment and some degree of parietal dysfunction which are supporters of Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis. In this context, we aimed to characterize the NP profile of GRN-bvFTD as compared to sporadic-bvFTD and AD in patients with mild dementia (Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥ 17 and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale score ≤ 1. We identified 21 patients at Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Portugal with GRN mutations belonging to fifteen different families. As our focus was bvFTD variants, FTD-related aphasic forms (3 patients) were excluded. The remaining 18 GRN-bvFTD were further matched with 18 sporadic-bvFTD and 18 AD patients according to disease staging, age and education. All patients completed the Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and a comprehensive NP assessment battery. Results were converted into z-scores. Differences between groups in individual NP measures and NP domains were assessed through non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis test analysis) and eta squared (ŋ2) was calculated as a measure of effect size. Group comparisons show that GRN patients have worse performances on verbal retrieval processes (P = 0.039, ŋ2 = 0.110) and visuoconstructive abilities (P = 0.039, ŋ2 = 0.190) than sporadic bvFTD forms. When compared to AD, GRN patients present a higher impairment in frontal (P = 0.001, ŋ2 = 0.211) and parietal (P = 0.041, ŋ2 = 0.129) measures and a better performance in memory tasks (P = 0.020, ŋ2 = 0.120). Sporadic-bvFTD forms are worse than AD in frontal measures (P = 0.032, ŋ2 = 0.200), being better in both memory (P = 0.010, ŋ2 = 0.131) and visuospatial skills (P = 0.023, ŋ2 = 0.231). Considering these results, we conclude that GRN-bvFTD patients present a NP profile that associates the typical patterns of FTD and AD deficits. This is particularly expressive in visuoconstructive abilities, which was the more discriminative feature between groups, followed by episodic verbal memory. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Portugal (CE-029/2019) on June 24, 2019.

Project description:ImportanceAnticholinergic medicines have short-term cognitive adverse effects, but it is uncertain whether long-term use of these drugs is associated with an increased risk of dementia.ObjectiveTo assess associations between anticholinergic drug treatments and risk of dementia in persons 55 years or older.Design, setting, and participantsThis nested case-control study took place in general practices in England that contributed to the QResearch primary care database. The study evaluated whether exposure to anticholinergic drugs was associated with dementia risk in 58 769 patients with a diagnosis of dementia and 225 574 controls 55 years or older matched by age, sex, general practice, and calendar time. Information on prescriptions for 56 drugs with strong anticholinergic properties was used to calculate measures of cumulative anticholinergic drug exposure. Data were analyzed from May 2016 to June 2018.ExposuresThe primary exposure was the total standardized daily doses (TSDDs) of anticholinergic drugs prescribed in the 1 to 11 years prior to the date of diagnosis of dementia or equivalent date in matched controls (index date).Main outcomes and measuresOdds ratios (ORs) for dementia associated with cumulative exposure to anticholinergic drugs, adjusted for confounding variables.ResultsOf the entire study population (284 343 case patients and matched controls), 179 365 (63.1%) were women, and the mean (SD) age of the entire population was 82.2 (6.8) years. The adjusted OR for dementia increased from 1.06 (95% CI, 1.03-1.09) in the lowest overall anticholinergic exposure category (total exposure of 1-90 TSDDs) to 1.49 (95% CI, 1.44-1.54) in the highest category (>1095 TSDDs), compared with no anticholinergic drug prescriptions in the 1 to 11 years before the index date. There were significant increases in dementia risk for the anticholinergic antidepressants (adjusted OR [AOR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.24-1.34), antiparkinson drugs (AOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.16-2.00), antipsychotics (AOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.53-1.90), bladder antimuscarinic drugs (AOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.56-1.75), and antiepileptic drugs (AOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.22-1.57) all for more than 1095 TSDDs. Results were similar when exposures were restricted to exposure windows of 3 to 13 years (AOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.41-1.52) and 5 to 20 years (AOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.32-1.57) before the index date for more than 1095 TSDDs. Associations were stronger in cases diagnosed before the age of 80 years. The population-attributable fraction associated with total anticholinergic drug exposure during the 1 to 11 years before diagnosis was 10.3%.Conclusions and relevanceExposure to several types of strong anticholinergic drugs is associated with an increased risk of dementia. These findings highlight the importance of reducing exposure to anticholinergic drugs in middle-aged and older people.

Project description:ObjectivesHypotension is of particular relevance for patients with heart failure (HF), since almost all HF drugs cause lowering of blood pressure (BP) and it is associated with a poor prognosis. We aimed to investigate hypotension incidence and risk factors in patients with incident HF in the UK.DesignRetrospective cohort study including nested case-control analyses.SettingThe Health Improvement Network UK primary care database.Participants18 677 adult patients with incident HF during 2000-2005 were followed and cases of hypotension (systolic BP ?90?mm Hg) were identified. Controls were age-matched, sex-matched and date-matched to cases (1:2).Primary and secondary outcome measuresWe estimated hypotension incidence in the full study population and relevant subgroups (eg, sex and age). Potential risk factors for hypotension overall and for multiple versus single hypotensive episodes were evaluated using conditional logistic regression and unconditional regression models, respectively.ResultsDuring a mean follow-up of 3.31 years, 2565 patients (13.7%) developed hypotension. The incidence of hypotension was 3.17 cases per 100 patient years (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.05-3.30), and was markedly increased in women aged 18-39 years (n=32; 17.72 cases per 100 patient-years; 95%?CI: 9.69-29.73). Hypotension risk factors included high healthcare utilisation (proxy measure for HF severity and general comorbidity; eg, ?10?primary care physician visits versus none, odds ratio (OR): 2.29; 95%?CI: 1.34-3.90), previous hypotensive episodes (OR: 2.32; 95%?CI: 1.84-2.92), renal failure and use of aldosterone antagonists, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. Risk factors identified for hypotension generally overlapped with those for multiple versus single hypotensive episodes.ConclusionsHypotension occurs frequently in patients with incident HF. Our findings may help identify patients most likely to benefit from close BP monitoring. The increased incidence of hypotension in young women with HF requires investigation.

Project description:IntroductionThe rising prevalence of rapid response teams has led to a demand for risk-stratification tools that can estimate a ward patient's risk of clinical deterioration and subsequent need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Finding such a risk-stratification tool is crucial for maximizing the utility of rapid response teams. This study compares the ability of nine risk prediction scores in detecting clinical deterioration among non-ICU ward patients. We also measured each score serially to characterize how these scores changed with time.MethodsIn a retrospective nested case-control study, we calculated nine well-validated prediction scores for 328 cases and 328 matched controls. Our cohort included non-ICU ward patients admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of infection, and cases were patients in this cohort who experienced clinical deterioration, defined as requiring a critical care consult, ICU admission, or death. We then compared each prediction score's ability, over the course of 72 hours, to discriminate between cases and controls.ResultsAt 0 to 12 hours before clinical deterioration, seven of the nine scores performed with acceptable discrimination: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score area under the curve of 0.78, Predisposition/Infection/Response/Organ Dysfunction Score of 0.76, VitalPac Early Warning Score of 0.75, Simple Clinical Score of 0.74, Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis of 0.74, Modified Early Warning Score of 0.73, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II of 0.73, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II of 0.72, and Rapid Emergency Medicine Score of 0.67. By measuring scores over time, it was found that average SOFA scores of cases increased as early as 24 to 48 hours prior to deterioration (P = 0.01). Finally, a clinical prediction rule which also accounted for the change in SOFA score was constructed and found to perform with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 72%, and this performance is better than that of any SOFA scoring model based on a single set of physiologic variables.ConclusionsICU- and emergency room-based prediction scores can also be used to prognosticate risk of clinical deterioration for non-ICU ward patients. In addition, scoring models that take advantage of a score's change over time may have increased prognostic value over models that use only a single set of physiologic measurements.