Dataset Information

Insertable inductively coupled volumetric coils for MR microscopy in a human 7T MR system.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To demonstrate the capability of insertable inductively coupled volumetric coils for MR microscopy in a human 7T MR system.

Methods

Insertable inductively coupled volume coils with diameters of 26 and 64 mm (D26 and D64 coils) targeted for monkey and mouse brain specimen sizes were designed and fabricated. These coils were placed inside the imaging volume of a transmit/receive knee coil without wired connections to the main system. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) evaluations were conducted with and without the insertable coils, and the g-factor maps of parallel imaging (PI) were also calculated for the D64 coil. Brain specimens were imaged using 3D T2∗ -weighted images with spatial resolution of isotropic 50 and 160 μm using D26 and D64 coils, respectively.

Results

Relative average (SD) SNRs compared with knee coil alone were 12.54 (0.30) and 2.37 (0.05) at the center for the D26 and D64 coils, respectively. The mean g-factors of PI with the D64 coil for the factor of 2 were less than 1.1 in the left-right and anterior-posterior directions, and around 1.5 in the superior-inferior direction or when the PI factor of 3 was used. Acceleration in two directions showed lower g-factors but suffered from intrinsic low SNR. Representative T2∗ -weighted images of the specimen showed structural details.

Conclusion

Inductively coupled small diameter coils insertable to the knee coil demonstrated high SNR and modest PI capability. The concept was successfully used to visualize fine structures of the brain specimen. The insertable coils are easy to handle and enable MR microscopy in a human whole-body 7T MRI system.

SUBMITTER: Okada T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9297907 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:The quality of carotid wall MRI can benefit substantially from a dedicated RF coil that is tailored towards the human neck geometry and optimized for image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), parallel imaging performance and RF penetration depth and coverage. In last decades, several of such dedicated carotid coils were introduced. However, a comparison of the more successful designs is still lacking. OBJECTIVE:To perform a head-to-head comparison over four dedicated MR carotid surface coils with 4, 6, 8 and 30 coil elements, respectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Ten volunteers were scanned on a 3T scanner. For each subject, multiple black-blood carotid vessel wall images were measured using the four coils with different parallel imaging settings. The performance of the coils was evaluated and compared in terms of image coverage, penetration depth and noise correlations between elements. Vessel wall of a common carotid section was delineated manually. Subsequently, images were assessed based on vessel wall morphology and image quality parameters. The morphological parameters consisted of the vessel wall area, thickness, and normalized wall index (wall area/total vessel area). Image quality parameters consisted of vessel wall SNR, wall-lumen contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), the vessel g-factor, and CNRindex ((wall-lumen signal) / (wall+lumen signal)). Repeated measures analysis of variance (rmANOVA) was applied for each parameter for the averaged 10 slices for all volunteers to assess effect of coil and SENSE factor. If the rmANOVA was significant, post-hoc comparisons were conducted. RESULTS:No significant coil effect were found for vessel wall morphological parameters. SENSE acceleration affected some morphological parameters for 6- and 8-channel coils, but had no effect on the 30-channel coil. The 30-channel coil achieved high acceleration factors (10x) with significantly lower vessel g-factor values (ps ≤ 0.01), but lower vessel wall SNR and CNR values (ps ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION:All four coils were capable of high-quality carotid MRI. The 30-channel coil is recommended when rapid image acquisition acceleration is required for 3D measurements, whereas 6- and 8-channel coils demonstrated the highest SNR performance.

Project description:BackgroundPrevious in vivo proton MR spectroscopy (MRS) studies have demonstrated the possibility of quantifying amide groups of conjugated bile acids (NHCBA), olefinic lipids and cholesterol (OLC), choline-containing phospholipids (CCPLs), taurine and glycine conjugated bile acids (TCBA, GCBA), methylene group of lipids (ML), and methyl groups of bile acids, lipids, and cholesterol (BALC1.0, BALC0.9, and TBAC) in the gallbladder, which may be useful for the study of cholestatic diseases and cholangiopathies. However, these studies were performed at 1.5T and 3T, and higher magnetic fields may offer improved spectral resolution and signal intensity.PurposeTo develop a method for gallbladder MRS at 7T.Study typeRetrospective, technical development.PopulationTen healthy subjects (five males and five females), two patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) (one male and one female), and one patient with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) (female).Field strength/sequenceFree-breathing single-voxel MRS with a modified stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) sequence at 7T.AssessmentPostprocessing was based on the T2 relaxation of water in the gallbladder and in the liver. Concentrations of biliary components were calculated using water signal. All data were corrected for T2 relaxation times measured in healthy subjects.Statistical testsThe range of T2 relaxation time and concentration per bile component, and the resulting mean and standard deviation, were calculated.ResultsThe concentrations of gallbladder components in healthy subjects were: NHCBA: 93 ± 66 mM, OLC: 154 ± 124 mM, CCPL: 42 ± 17 mM, TCBA: 48 ± 35 mM, GCBA: 67 ± 32 mM, ML: 740 ± 391 mM, BALC1.0: 175 ± 92 mM, BALC0.9: 260 ± 138 mM, and TBAC: 153 ± 90 mM. Mean concentrations of all bile components were found to be lower in patients.Data conclusionThis work provides a protocol for designing future MRS investigations of the bile system in vivo.Evidence level2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.