Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

18 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Validation of a claims-based algorithm to identify cases of ulcerative colitis in Japan.

ABSTRACT:

Background and aim

The prevalence of ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing in Japan. Validated claims-based definitions are required to investigate the epidemiology of UC and its treatment and disease course in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a claims-based algorithm for UC in Japan.

Methods

A committee of epidemiologists, gastroenterologists, and internal medicine physicians developed a claims-based definition for UC, based on diagnostic codes and claims for UC treatments, procedures (cytapheresis), or surgery (postoperative claims). Claims data and medical records for a random sample of 200 cases per site at two large tertiary care academic centers in Japan were used to calculate the positive predictive value (PPV) of the algorithm for three gold standards of diagnosis, defined as physician diagnosis in the medical records, adjudicated cases, or registration in the Japanese Intractable Disease Registry (IDR).

Results

Overall, 1139 claims-defined UC cases were identified. Among 393 randomly sampled cases (mean age 44; 48% female), 94% had received ≥ 1 systemic treatment (immunosuppressants, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, corticosteroids, or antidiarrheals), 7% had cytapheresis, and 7% had postoperative claims. When physician diagnosis was used as a gold standard, PPV was 90.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87.7-93.5). PPV with expert adjudication was also 90.6% (95% CI: 87.7-93.5). PPVs with enrollment in the IDR as gold standard were lower at 41.5% (95% CI: 36.6-46.3) due to incomplete case registration.

Conclusions

The claims-based algorithm developed for use in Japan is likely to identify UC cases with high PPV for clinical studies using administrative claims databases.

SUBMITTER: Ogino H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9298722 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Validation of an algorithm for identifying MS cases in administrative health claims datasets.

Project description:ObjectiveTo develop a valid algorithm for identifying multiple sclerosis (MS) cases in administrative health claims (AHC) datasets.MethodsWe used 4 AHC datasets from the Veterans Administration (VA), Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), Manitoba (Canada), and Saskatchewan (Canada). In the VA, KPSC, and Manitoba, we tested the performance of candidate algorithms based on inpatient, outpatient, and disease-modifying therapy (DMT) claims compared to medical records review using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and interrater reliability (Youden J statistic) both overall and stratified by sex and age. In Saskatchewan, we tested the algorithms in a cohort randomly selected from the general population.ResultsThe preferred algorithm required ≥3 MS-related claims from any combination of inpatient, outpatient, or DMT claims within a 1-year time period; a 2-year time period provided little gain in performance. Algorithms including DMT claims performed better than those that did not. Sensitivity (86.6%-96.0%), specificity (66.7%-99.0%), positive predictive value (95.4%-99.0%), and interrater reliability (Youden J = 0.60-0.92) were generally stable across datasets and across strata. Some variation in performance in the stratified analyses was observed but largely reflected changes in the composition of the strata. In Saskatchewan, the preferred algorithm had a sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 99%, positive predictive value of 99%, and negative predictive value of 96%.ConclusionsThe performance of each algorithm was remarkably consistent across datasets. The preferred algorithm required ≥3 MS-related claims from any combination of inpatient, outpatient, or DMT use within 1 year. We recommend this algorithm as the standard AHC case definition for MS.

| S-EPMC6442008 | biostudies-literature

External validation of a claims-based algorithm for classifying kidney-cancer surgeries.

Project description:Unlike other malignancies, there is no literature supporting the accuracy of medical claims data for identifying surgical treatments among patients with kidney cancer. We sought to validate externally a previously published Medicare-claims-based algorithm for classifying surgical treatments among patients with early-stage kidney cancer. To achieve this aim, we compared procedure assignments based on Medicare claims with the type of surgery specified in SEER registry data and clinical operative reports.Using linked SEER-Medicare data, we calculated the agreement between Medicare claims and SEER data for identification of cancer-directed surgery among 6,515 patients diagnosed with early-stage kidney cancer. Next, for a subset of 120 cases, we determined the agreement between the claims algorithm and the medical record. Finally, using the medical record as the reference-standard, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the claims algorithm.Among 6,515 cases, Medicare claims and SEER data identified 5,483 (84.1%) and 5,774 (88.6%) patients, respectively, who underwent cancer-directed surgery (observed agreement = 93%, kappa = 0.69, 95% CI 0.66 - 0.71). The two data sources demonstrated 97% agreement for classification of partial versus radical nephrectomy (kappa = 0.83, 95% CI 0.81 - 0.86). We observed 97% agreement between the claims algorithm and clinical operative reports; the positive predictive value of the claims algorithm exceeded 90% for identification of both partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic surgery.Medicare claims represent an accurate data source for ascertainment of population-based patterns of surgical care among patients with early-stage kidney cancer.

| S-EPMC2698842 | biostudies-other

Real-World Prescription Pattern and Healthcare Cost Among Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in Japan: A Retrospective Claims Data Analysis.

Project description:IntroductionThe prevalence of ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing in Japan but recent disease burden estimates are unavailable. This study was conducted to explore the prescription pattern and to estimate the economic burden in Japanese patients with UC.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted from 1 January 2009 to 30 June 2018 using healthcare claims data from the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) database. Patients with a UC diagnosis before the index date (the first UC treatment claim) or within 6 months after the index date, a UC treatment claim registered within ≥ 6 months during the selection period, and a continuous enrollment for 6 months pre-index and 12 months follow-up period were included in the study. Prescription pattern was analyzed by calendar years and lines of treatment (LoT). Healthcare resource utilization and cost per month were determined by LoTs.ResultsAmong 10,337 patients with UC diagnosis, 1,861 (18.0%) met the eligibility criteria for this study. 5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) was the most used treatment over the study period and across all LoTs. 5-ASA was also the most prescribed treatment (88.7%) across all the first LoTs, followed by steroids (20.4%). Use of biologics increased over the study period (biologics + 5-ASA: 0.0% in 2009 to 3.0% in 2018). Biologics were most used as the sixth LoT (7.1%, biologics + 5-ASA; 7.1%, biologics + 5-ASA + steroids). Mean total cost per month was JPY 52,782, with the highest (JPY 112,997) total healthcare cost per month in the fourth LoT and the lowest in the first LoT (JPY 56,782).ConclusionPrescription pattern in Japanese patients with UC enrolled in the JMDC database were largely consistent with the clinical guidelines in Japan. UC puts a substantial economic burden on patients, and an effective treatment is warranted to reduce the UC disease burden.

| S-EPMC8107172 | biostudies-literature

Validation of an Algorithm for Claims-based Incidence of Prostate Cancer.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Prostate cancer is a commonly studied outcome in administrative claims studies, but there is a dearth of validated case identifying algorithms. The long-term development of the disease increases the difficulty in separating prevalent from incident prostate cancer. The purpose of this validation study was to assess the accuracy of a claims algorithm to identify incident prostate cancer among men in commercial and Medicare Advantage US health plans. METHODS:We identified prostate cancer in claims as a prostate cancer diagnosis within 28 days after a prostate biopsy and compared case ascertainment in the claims with the gold standard results from the Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Registry (GCCR). RESULTS:We identified 74,008 men from a large health plan claims database for possible linkage with GCCR. Among the 382 prostate cancer cases identified in claims, 312 were also identified in the GCCR (positive predictive value [PPV] = 82%). Of the registry cases, 91% (95% confidence interval = 88, 94) were correctly identified in claims. Claims and registry diagnosis dates of prostate cancer matched exactly in 254/312 (81%) cases. Nearly half of the false-positive cases also had claims for prostate cancer treatment. Thirteen (43%) false-negative cases were classified as noncases by virtue of having a biopsy and diagnosis >28 days apart as required by the algorithm. Compared to matches, false-negative cases were older men with less aggressive prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS:Our algorithm demonstrated a PPV of 82% with 92% sensitivity in ascertaining incident PC. Administrative health plan claims can be a valuable and accurate source to identify incident prostate cancer cases.

| S-EPMC6456424 | biostudies-literature

Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Identify Patients with Multiple Myeloma Using Administrative Claims Data.

Project description:PurposeThe objective was to expand on prior work by developing and validating a new algorithm to identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients in administrative claims.MethodsTwo files were constructed to select MM cases from MarketScan Oncology Electronic Medical Records (EMR) and controls from the MarketScan Primary Care EMR during January 1, 2000-March 31, 2014. Patients were linked to MarketScan claims databases, and files were merged. Eligible cases were age ≥18, had a diagnosis and visit for MM in the Oncology EMR, and were continuously enrolled in claims for ≥90 days preceding and ≥30 days after diagnosis. Controls were age ≥18, had ≥12 months of overlap in claims enrollment (observation period) in the Primary Care EMR and ≥1 claim with an ICD-9-CM diagnosis code of MM (203.0×) during that time. Controls were excluded if they had chemotherapy; stem cell transplant; or text documentation of MM in the EMR during the observation period. A split sample was used to develop and validate algorithms. A maximum of 180 days prior to and following each MM diagnosis was used to identify events in the diagnostic process. Of 20 algorithms explored, the baseline algorithm of 2 MM diagnoses and the 3 best performing were validated. Values for sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated.ConclusionThree claims-based algorithms were validated with ~10% improvement in PPV (87-94%) over prior work (81%) and the baseline algorithm (76%) and can be considered for future research. Consistent with prior work, it was found that MM diagnoses before and after tests were needed.

| S-EPMC5081355 | biostudies-literature

Development of a claims-based algorithm to identify potentially undiagnosed chronic migraine patients.

Project description:ObjectiveTo develop a claims-based algorithm to identify undiagnosed chronic migraine among patients enrolled in a healthcare system.MethodsAn observational study using claims and patient survey data was conducted in a large medical group. Eligible patients had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/Tenth Revision (ICD-9/10) migraine diagnosis, without a chronic migraine diagnosis, in the 12 months before screening and did not have a migraine-related onabotulinumtoxinA claim in the 12 months before enrollment. Trained clinicians administered a semi-structured diagnostic interview, which served as the gold standard to diagnose chronic migraine, to enrolled patients. Potential claims-based predictors of chronic migraine that differentiated semi-structured diagnostic interview-positive (chronic migraine) and semi-structured diagnostic interview-negative (non-chronic migraine) patients were identified in bivariate analyses for inclusion in a logistic regression model.ResultsThe final sample included 108 patients (chronic migraine = 64; non-chronic migraine = 44). Four significant predictors for chronic migraine were identified using claims in the 12 months before enrollment: ≥15 versus <15 claims for acute treatment of migraine, including opioids (odds ratio = 5.87 [95% confidence interval: 1.34-25.63]); ≥24 versus <24 healthcare visits (odds ratio = 2.80 [confidence interval: 1.08-7.25]); female versus male sex (odds ratio = 9.17 [confidence interval: 1.26-66.50); claims for ≥2 versus 0 unique migraine preventive classes (odds ratio = 4.39 [confidence interval: 1.19-16.22]). Model sensitivity was 78.1%; specificity was 72.7%.ConclusionsThe claims-based algorithm identified undiagnosed chronic migraine with sufficient sensitivity and specificity to have potential utility as a chronic migraine case-finding tool using health claims data. Research to further validate the algorithm is recommended.

| S-EPMC6604052 | biostudies-literature

Clonal expansions in ulcerative colitis identify patients with neoplasia.

Project description:Chronic inflammation predisposes to a variety of human cancers. Affected tissues slowly accumulate mutations, some of which affect growth regulation and drive successive waves of clonal evolution, whereas a far greater number are functionally neutral and serve only to passively mark expanding clones. Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease, in which up to 10% of patients eventually develop colon cancer. Here we have mapped mutations in hypermutable intergenic and intronic polyguanine tracts in patients with UC to delineate the extent of clonal expansions associated with carcinogenesis. We genotyped colon biopsies for length altering mutations at 28 different polyguanine markers. In eight patients without neoplasia, we detected only two mutations in a single individual from among 37 total biopsies. In contrast, for 11 UC patients with neoplasia elsewhere in the colon, we identified 63 mutations in 51 nondysplastic biopsies, and every patient possessed at least one mutant clone. A subset of clones were large and extended over many square centimeters of colon. Of these, some occurred as isolated populations in nondysplastic tissue, considerably distant from neoplastic lesions. Other large clones included regions of cancer, suggesting that the tumor arose within a preexisting clonal field. Our results demonstrate that neutral mutations in polyguanine tracts serve as a unique tool for identifying fields of clonal expansions, which may prove clinically useful for distinguishing a subset of UC patients who are at risk for developing cancer.

| S-EPMC2779829 | biostudies-literature

Patients' Preference of Topical Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis in Japan: A Web-based 3T Survey.

Project description:BackgroundThe therapeutic drugs available for ulcerative colitis (UC) have recently increased. However, use of topical therapy for UC in Japan has not been determined. This study aimed to investigate real-world use of topical therapy for UC in Japan using a web-based survey designed for UC patients.MethodsA web-based questionnaire on UC management was administered to 773 patients over a 2-day period in September 2019. The responses regarding topical therapy use were analyzed.ResultsQuestionnaire responses were obtained from 323 UC patients. Of these, the mean disease duration was 12.2 years, and 220 patients (68.1%) had used topical therapy, of whom 68 (21.1%) were currently using this treatment. The frequency of using the prescribed topical therapy was appropriate in 36.8% of patients, only when needed in 38.6%, and rarely in 24.5%. Among all topical therapy users, 64.4% reported that budesonide foam was easy to use, which was significantly higher than the rates for mesalazine suppositories (43.6%), mesalazine enemas (12.9%), and glucocorticoid enemas (13.9%; P < 0.05). Regarding treatment effects, 68.9% of patients were satisfied with the budesonide foam, which was a significantly higher rate of satisfaction than those for mesalazine suppositories (44.6%), mesalazine enemas (30.2%), glucocorticoid enemas (36.1%), and glucocorticoid suppositories (41.9%; P < 0.05).ConclusionsAlthough topical therapy use was common in this Japanese UC population, patient adherence was not very high. Of all the topical therapy types, budesonide foam, which has recently become available, was rated highly by these patients.

| S-EPMC9927820 | biostudies-literature

Development and validation of a predictive algorithm to identify adult asthmatics from medical services and pharmacy claims databases.

Project description:ObjectiveTo develop and validate the accuracy of a predictive model to identify adult asthmatics from administrative health care databases.Study settingAn existing electronic medical record project in Montreal, Quebec.Study designOne thousand four hundred and thirty-one patients with confirmed asthma status were identified from primary care physician's electronic medical record.Data collection/extraction methodsTherapeutic indication of asthma in an electronic prescription and/or confirmed asthma from an automated problem list were used as the gold standard. Five groups of asthma-specific markers were identified from administrative health care databases to estimate the probability of the presence of asthma. Cross-validation evaluated the diagnostic ability of each predictive model using 50 percent of sample.Principal findingsThe best performance in discriminating between the patients with asthma and those without it included indicators from medical service and prescription claims databases. The best-fitting algorithm had a sensitivity of 70 percent, a specificity of 94 percent, and positive predictive value of 65 percent. The prescriptions claims-specific algorithm demonstrated a nearly equal performance to the model with medical services and prescription claims combined.ConclusionsOur algorithm using asthma-specific markers from administrative claims databases provided moderate sensitivity and high specificity.

| S-EPMC3097410 | biostudies-literature

Use of a medication-based algorithm to identify advanced Parkinson's disease in administrative claims data: Associations with claims-based indicators of disease severity.

Project description:IntroductionLack of a gold standard definition for advanced Parkinson's Disease (APD), coupled with absence of disease severity information in diagnostic codes, hinders use of large administrative databases for conducting population health and comparative effectiveness studies.MethodsUsing pharmacy claims data, we created an algorithm to identify APD: any 30-day average levodopa equivalent dose (LED) >1000 mg/day. Using 2013 100% U.S. Medicare claims, we applied this algorithm and used multivariate logistic regression to examine associations between assigned APD status and claims-based indicators of PD severity (any deep brain stimulation, fall, hallucinations, walker, wheelchair, specialty bed, dementia diagnosis, skilled nursing facility, hospice), adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics. Levodopa >1000 mg/day, levodopa >800 mg/day and LED >800 mg/day were used in sensitivity analysis.ResultsIn our sample (N = 144,703), 20% were assigned APD status based on the LED >1000 mg/day cut-off. This group had significantly higher odds of having each claims-based indicator, compared with those assigned mild-moderate PD status. Odds ratios were highest for indicators for any DBS (OR: 2.96; 95% CI:2.75-3.19) and specialty bed (OR:2.15, 95% CI: 1.99-2.32) and lowest for fall (OR:1.27; 95% CI:1.20-1.34) and dementia diagnosis (OR:1.21; 95% CI:1.18-1.25). Results based on alternative approaches were similar.ConclusionsMedicare patients classified as having APD via a pharmacy claims-based algorithm had higher odds of having claims-based clinical markers of APD, compared with patients categorized as having mild-moderate PD. This proxy strategy could facilitate future claims-based studies and warrants further refinement and validation using medical records or other clinical sources.

| S-EPMC8298763 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data