Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Sampling bias exaggerates a textbook example of a trophic cascade.


ABSTRACT: Understanding trophic cascades in terrestrial wildlife communities is a major challenge because these systems are difficult to sample properly. We show how a tradition of non-random sampling has confounded this understanding in a textbook system (Yellowstone National Park) where carnivore [Canis lupus (wolf)] recovery is associated with a trophic cascade involving changes in herbivore [Cervus canadensis (elk)] behaviour and density that promote plant regeneration. Long-term data indicate a practice of sampling only the tallest young plants overestimated regeneration of overstory aspen (Populus tremuloides) by a factor of 4-7 compared to random sampling because it favoured plants taller than the preferred browsing height of elk and overlooked non-regenerating aspen stands. Random sampling described a trophic cascade, but it was weaker than the one that non-random sampling described. Our findings highlight the critical importance of basic sampling principles (e.g. randomisation) for achieving an accurate understanding of trophic cascades in terrestrial wildlife systems.

SUBMITTER: Brice EM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9298920 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6234027 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3703983 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4766389 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5698640 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1895955 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10700615 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3962249 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5454242 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4753470 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7737904 | biostudies-literature