Dataset Information

Comprehensive Analysis of TRP Channel-Related Genes in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer for Guiding Prognostic Prediction.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a special subtype of breast cancer. Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) channel superfamily has emerged as a novel and interesting target in a variety of tumors. However, the association of TRP channel-related genes with TNBC is still unclear.

Methods

The The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-TNBC and GSE58812 datasets were downloaded from the public database. The differentially expressed TRP channel-related genes (DETGs) were screened by limma package, and mutations of the above genes were analyzed. Subsequently, new molecular subtypes in TNBC-based DETGs were explored by consensus clustering analysis. In addition, Lasso-Cox regression analysis was used to divide it into two robust risk subtypes: high-risk group and low-risk group. The accuracy and distinguishing ability of above models were verified by a variety of methods, including Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, ROC analysis, calibration curve, and PCA analysis. Meanwhile, CIBERSORT algorithm was used to excavate status of immune-infiltrating cells in TNBC tissues. Last, we explored the therapeutic effect of drugs and underlying mechanisms of risk subgroups by pRRophetic package and GSEA algorithm, respectively.

Results

A total of 19 DETGs were identified in 115 TNBC and 113 normal samples from TCGA database. In addition, missense mutation and SNP were the most common variant classification. According to Lasso-Cox regression analysis, the risky formula performed best when nine genes were used: TRPM5, TRPV2, HTR2B, HRH1, P2RY2, MAP2K6, NTRK1, ADCY6, and PRKACB. Subsequently, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, ROC analysis, calibration curve, and Principal Components Analysis (PCA) analysis showed an excellent accuracy for predicting OS using risky formula in each cohort (P < 0.05). Specifically, high-risk group had a shorter OS compared with low-risk group. In addition, T-cell CD4 memory activated and macrophages M1 were enriched in normal tissues, whereas Tregs were increased in tumor tissues. Note that the low-risk group was better therapeutic effect to docetaxel, doxorubicin, cisplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine than the high-risk group (P < 0.05). Last, in vitro assays, Quantitative Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) indicated that TRPM5 was significantly highly expressed in MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells compared with that in MCF-10A cells (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

We identified a risky formula based on expression of TRP channel-related genes that can predict prognosis, therapeutic effect, and status of tumor microenvironment for patients with TNBC.

SUBMITTER: Zhang H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9300844 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous subtype of breast cancer, showing aggressive clinical behaviors and poor outcomes. It urgently needs new therapeutic strategies to improve the prognosis of TNBC. Bioinformatics analyses have been widely used to identify potential biomarkers for facilitating TNBC diagnosis and management.MethodsWe identified potential biomarkers and analyzed their diagnostic and prognostic values using bioinformatics approaches. Including differential expression gene (DEG) analysis, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, functional enrichment analysis, Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network construction, survival analysis, multivariate Cox regression analysis, and Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF).ResultsA total of 105 DEGs were identified between TNBC and other breast cancer subtypes, which were regarded as heterogeneous-related genes. Subsequently, the KEGG enrichment analysis showed that these genes were significantly enriched in 'cell cycle' and 'oocyte meiosis' related pathways. Four (FAM83B, KITLG, CFD and RBM24) of 105 genes were identified as prognostic signatures in the disease-free interval (DFI) of TNBC patients, as for progression-free interval (PFI), five genes (FAM83B, EXO1, S100B, TYMS and CFD) were obtained. Time-dependent ROC analysis indicated that the multivariate Cox regression models, which were constructed based on these genes, had great predictive performances. Finally, the survival analysis of TNBC subtypes (mesenchymal stem-like [MSL] and mesenchymal [MES]) suggested that FAM83B significantly affected the prognosis of patients.ConclusionsThe multivariate Cox regression models constructed from four heterogeneous-related genes (FAM83B, KITLG, RBM24 and S100B) showed great prediction performance for TNBC patients' prognostic. Moreover, FAM83B was an important prognostic feature in several TNBC subtypes (MSL and MES). Our findings provided new biomarkers to facilitate the targeted therapies of TNBC and TNBC subtypes.

Project description:BACKGROUND: A breast cancer prognostic tool should ideally be applicable to all types of invasive breast lesions. A number of studies have shown histopathological grade to be an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer, adding prognostic power to nodal stage and tumour size. The Nottingham Prognostic Index has been shown to accurately predict patient outcome in stratified groups with a follow-up period of 15 years after primary diagnosis of breast cancer. Clinically, breast tumours that lack the expression of Oestrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor and Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) are identified as presenting a "triple-negative" phenotype or as triple-negative breast cancers. These poor outcome tumours represent an easily recognisable prognostic group of breast cancer with aggressive behaviour that currently lack the benefit of available systemic therapy. There are conflicting results on the prevalence of lymph node metastasis at the time of diagnosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients but it is currently accepted that triple-negative breast cancer does not metastasize to axillary nodes and bones as frequently as the non-triple-negative carcinomas, favouring instead, a preferentially haematogenous spread. Hypothetically, this particular tumour dissemination pattern would impair the reliability of using Nottingham Prognostic Index as a tool for triple-negative breast cancer prognostication. METHODS: The present study tested the effectiveness of the Nottingham Prognostic Index in stratifying breast cancer patients of different subtypes with special emphasis in a triple-negative breast cancer patient subset versus non- triple-negative breast cancer. RESULTS: We demonstrated that besides the fact that TNBC disseminate to axillary lymph nodes as frequently as luminal or HER2 tumours, we also showed that TNBC are larger in size compared with other subtypes and almost all grade 3. Additionally, survival curves demonstrated that these prognostic factors are equally important to stratify different survival outcomes in non-TNBC as in TNBC. We also showed that the NPI retains the ability to stratify and predict survival of TNBC patients. CONCLUSION: The importance of this study relies on the need of prognostication improvements on TNBC, showing, at a clinical standpoint, that Nottingham Prognostic Index is as a truthful prognostic tool in TNBC.