Dataset Information

Application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary focal lesions.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Peripheral pulmonary lesions are encountered frequently in clinical practice. Accurate diagnosis of these lesions is of great importance for clinicians. Ultrasound-guided lung tissue puncture is a reliable method for diagnosing these lesions.

Objectives

To investigate the application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary focal lesions.

Methods

Eighty patients enrolled from July 2020 to June 2021 were divided into two groups: a conventional ultrasound group and a CEUS group. Both groups underwent diagnostic procedures guided by ROSE to improve the success rate of puncture sampling. The success rates and complications in both groups were compared. The results for lesion enhancement, time taken for the contrast agent to reach the lesions (AT) and lung tissues (L-AT), and the difference between these times (∆AT) were compared in the CEUS group.

Results

The success rate of biopsy in the CEUS group was 97.62%, which was significantly higher than that in the conventional ultrasound group (84%; P < .05). Puncture complications did not occur in the CEUS group and occurred in 5.26% of the cases in the conventional ultrasound group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). A comparison of enhancement of benign lesions and malignant lesions in the CEUS group showed a statistically significant difference (P < .05). The difference between the AT and ∆AT of benign and malignant lesions was statistically significant (P <.05). The optimal threshold of ∆AT was 2.05 s.

Conclusion

CEUS combined with ROSE is a very important approach for biopsy in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary focal lesions. CEUS has definite clinical value in the diagnosis of benign and malignant lung lesions.

SUBMITTER: Bai Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9302248 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary focal lesions.

Bai Zina Z Liu Tong T Liu Wei W Li Zhensheng Z Zheng Hao H Li Xingbin X

Medicine 20220722 29

<h4>Introduction</h4>Peripheral pulmonary lesions are encountered frequently in clinical practice. Accurate diagnosis of these lesions is of great importance for clinicians. Ultrasound-guided lung tissue puncture is a reliable method for diagnosing these lesions.<h4>Objectives</h4>To investigate the application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary focal lesions.<h4>Methods</h4>Eighty patients enrolled ...[more]

PMID: 35866769

Similar Datasets

Project description:The aim of the present study was to assess the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions and the diagnostic value of its clinical application. A total of 52 cases with malignant breast tumors and 73 cases with benign breast lesions were included in the study. Time-intensity curves (TICs) for contrast-enhanced ultrasound were recorded, and the perfusion parameters were obtained and analyzed. Typical features of malignant breast tumors included irregular shape and vascular morphology, uneven contrast agent distribution, filling defects and contrast agent retention, 'fast-out' wash-out mode, unclear boundaries and uneven internal echo. Benign lesions were characterized by 'slow-out' or synchronous wash-out mode. Regarding perfusion, the starting time of the perfusion of the Sone-Vue microbubble contrast (always 20-30 sec) and time to peak (TTP) were significantly earlier for the malignant lesions, while the wash-out time was later. A significantly greater peak intensity, rising slope and area under the TIC were observed for the malignant breast lesions. All of the malignant breast lesions exhibited an enlarged focus scope on ultrasound, while no obvious focus scope enhancement was observed for benign breast lesions. Furthermore, the TICs of 88.4% of malignant breast lesions were of the fast-rising and slow-declining type, while the TICs of 75.3 and 17.8% of the benign breast lesions were of the slow-rising and fast-declining, and fast-rising and fast-declining type, respectively. Receiver operating characteristics analysis indicated that the TTP, wash-out time and rising slope might contribute to the differential diagnosis between malignant and benign breast lesions. In conclusion, TIC parameters of contrast-enhanced ultrasound have promising clinical value in differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions. The TTP, wash-out time and rising slope may contribute to the diagnosis of patients with breast lesions to facilitate timely treatment and prognostication of breast cancer patients.

Project description:BackgroundBreast cancer lesions show an expanded range on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Here, we quantitatively analyze this index to explore its effective cutoff value for distinguishing benign and malignant lesions and the corresponding diagnostic performance and investigate its role in prognostic assessment of malignant lesions.MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent CEUS for breast lesions during the period from September 2017 to June 2019 were included. Original CEUS images were selected, displayed in dual-frame mode, and measured when enhancement of the lesion reached its peak. The longitudinal diameter, transverse diameter, and area of the lesion on the two-dimensional images and the corresponding postenhancement images were measured to calculate six indicators: longitudinal diameter increment, transverse diameter increment, area increment, percent increase in longitudinal diameter, percent increase in transverse diameter, and percent increase in area increment. With postoperative pathology as the gold standard, the cutoff values for distinguishing benign and malignant lesions and the correlations of these indicators with pathological subtypes and pathological grades were evaluated.ResultsMalignant lesions showed a more significantly expanded range after enhancement compared to benign lesions, especially in terms of area increase. When the cutoff value of the area increment was set at 0.47 cm2 for distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.945, and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 90.1%, 91.5%, 90.9%, 87.2%, and 93.5%, respectively. The pathologically measured maximum diameter of malignant masses correlated with the percent increase in transverse diameter, area increment, and percent increase in area increment. The longitudinal diameter increment in the luminal A group was significantly smaller than that in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+ group. The percent increase in transverse diameter was helpful for predicting the pathological grade of malignant masses. When the cutoff value of the percent increase in transverse diameter was set at 10.84% for pathological grading, the AUC was 0.623, and the sensitivity was 90.8%.ConclusionsIndicators related to the expanded lesion range on CEUS are helpful in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions and in prognostic assessment of pathological grades.

Project description:Purpose To assess the performance of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems and to determine the dominant ultrasonographic (US) features when classifying benign versus malignant focal liver lesions (FLLs) by using contrast material-enhanced US cine clips. Materials and Methods One hundred six US data sets in all subjects enrolled by three centers from a multicenter trial that included 54 malignant, 51 benign, and one indeterminate FLL were retrospectively analyzed. The 105 benign or malignant lesions were confirmed at histologic examination, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and/or 6 or more months of clinical follow-up. Data sets included 3-minute cine clips that were automatically corrected for in-plane motion and automatically filtered out frames acquired off plane. B-mode and contrast-specific features were automatically extracted on a pixel-by-pixel basis and analyzed by using an artificial neural network (ANN) and a support vector machine (SVM). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for CAD were compared with those for one experienced and one inexperienced blinded reader. A third observer graded cine quality to assess its effects on CAD performance. Results CAD, the inexperienced observer, and the experienced observer were able to analyze 95, 100, and 102 cine clips, respectively. The AUCs for the SVM, ANN, and experienced and inexperienced observers were 0.883 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.793, 0.940), 0.829 (95% CI: 0.724, 0.901), 0.843 (95% CI: 0.756, 0.903), and 0.702 (95% CI: 0.586, 0.782), respectively; only the difference between SVM and the inexperienced observer was statistically significant. Accuracy improved from 71.3% (67 of 94; 95% CI: 60.6%, 79.8%) to 87.7% (57 of 65; 95% CI: 78.5%, 93.8%) and from 80.9% (76 of 94; 95% CI: 72.3%, 88.3%) to 90.3% (65 of 72; 95% CI: 80.6%, 95.8%) when CAD was in agreement with the inexperienced reader and when it was in agreement with the experienced reader, respectively. B-mode heterogeneity and contrast material washout were the most discriminating features selected by CAD for all iterations. CAD selected time-based time-intensity curve (TIC) features 99.0% (207 of 209) of the time to classify FLLs, versus 1.0% (two of 209) of the time for intensity-based features. None of the 15 video-quality criteria had a statistically significant effect on CAD accuracy-all P values were greater than the Holm-Sidak α-level correction for multiple comparisons. Conclusion CAD systems classified benign and malignant FLLs with an accuracy similar to that of an expert reader. CAD improved the accuracy of both readers. Time-based features of TIC were more discriminating than intensity-based features. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Project description:BackgroundThe UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recommended contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterisation of focal liver lesions where the results of standard unenhanced ultrasound are inconclusive. A further recommendation is for CEUS to replace other imaging modalities. However, little is currently known about the diagnostic pathways in the National Health Service (NHS) followed by patients with potential liver lesions. The aim of this study was to identify the diagnostic pathways for a number of representative hospital trusts and record the clinicians' views on patient experiences of these processes through a series of semi-structured interviews with UK clinicians (radiologists and sonographers) (N = 7). This study was undertaken in the broader context of a larger research project where the overarching research question is focused on patient preferences for CEUS and other imaging modalities, and how these impact on patient quality of life (QOL).ResultsThe results from the semi-structured interviews with UK clinicians revealed that there is a great deal of heterogeneity in diagnostic pathways followed by patients with potential liver lesions which differ both within and between hospitals. In terms of the patient experience, the clinicians believed that a combination of the more patient-friendly ultrasound process, and the fact that scan results are given to patients in 80-90% of cases on the day, as well as the problems inherent to other scan modalities (claustrophobia, anxiety) would lead to patients preferring ultrasound compared with other imaging modalities (CT or MR). However, current clinical practice means that patient choice is virtually non-existent.ConclusionsThe significant variation in diagnostic pathways across the NHS will require further standardisation through local agreements if contrast-enhanced ultrasound is to replace other imaging modalities in characterising focal liver lesions in line with NICE Diagnostics Guidance. The gradual development of patient choice of modalities may necessitate a change of practice in radiology processes.

Dataset Information

Application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary focal lesions.

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary focal lesions.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets