Dataset Information

Identification of Candidate Genes Associated With Prognosis in Glioblastoma.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor, which associated with extremely poor prognosis.

Methods

Data from datasets GSE16011, GSE7696, GSE50161, GSE90598 and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between patients and controls. DEGs common to all five datasets were analyzed for functional enrichment and for association with overall survival using Cox regression. Candidate genes were further screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and random forest algorithms, and the effects of candidate genes on prognosis were explored using a Gaussian mixed model, a risk model, and concordance cluster analysis. We also characterized the GBM landscape of immune cell infiltration, methylation, and somatic mutations.

Results

We identified 3,139 common DEGs, which were associated mainly with PI3K-Akt signaling, focal adhesion, and Hippo signaling. Cox regression identified 106 common DEGs that were significantly associated with overall survival. LASSO and random forest algorithms identified six candidate genes (AEBP1, ANXA2R, MAP1LC3A, TMEM60, PRRG3 and RPS4X) that predicted overall survival and GBM recurrence. AEBP1 showed the best prognostic performance. We found that GBM tissues were heavily infiltrated by T helper cells and macrophages, which correlated with higher AEBP1 expression. Stratifying patients based on the six candidate genes led to two groups with significantly different overall survival. Somatic mutations in AEBP1 and modified methylation of MAP1LC3A were associated with GBM.

Conclusion

We have identified candidate genes, particularly AEBP1, strongly associated with GBM prognosis, which may help in efforts to understand and treat the disease.

SUBMITTER: Li R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9302577 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Glioblastoma is a common malignant neuroepithelial neoplasm with poor clinical outcomes and limited treatment options. It is extremely important to search and confirm diverse hub genes that are effective in the advance and prediction of glioblastoma. Methods: We analyzed GSE50161, GSE4290, and GSE68848, the three microarray datasets retrieved from the GEO database. GO function and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were performed using DAVID. The PPI network of the DEGs was analyzed using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes database and visualized by Cytoscape software. Hub genes were identified through the PPI network and a robust rank aggregation method. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Oncomine database were used to validate the hub genes. In addition, a survival curve analysis was conducted to verify the correlation between the expression of hub genes and patient prognosis. Human glioblastoma cells and normal cells were collected, and then RT-PCR, Western blot, and immunofluorescence were conducted to validate the expression of the NDC80 gene. A cell proliferation assay was used to detect the proliferation of glioma cells. The effects of NDC80 expression on migration and invasion of GBM cell lines were evaluated by conducting scratch and transwell assays. Results: A total of 716 DEGs were common to all three microarray datasets, which included 188 upregulated DEGs and 528 downregulated DEGs. Furthermore, we found that among the common DEGs, 10 hub genes showed a high degree of connectivity. The expression of the 10 hub genes in TCGA and the Oncomine database was significantly overexpressed in glioblastoma compared with normal genes. Additionally, the survival analysis showed that the patients with low expression of six genes (BIR5C, CDC20, NDC80, CDK1, TOP2A, and MELK) had a significantly favorable prognosis (p < 0.01). We discovered that NDC80, which has been shown to be important in other cancers, also has an important role in malignant gliomas. The RT-PCR, Western blot, and immunofluorescence results showed that the expression level of NDC80 was significantly higher in human glioblastoma cells than in normal cells. Moreover, we identified that NDC80 increased the proliferation and invasion abilities of human glioblastoma cells. Conclusion: The six genes identified here may be utilized to form a panel of disease progression and predictive biomarkers of glioblastoma for clinical purposes. NDC80, one of the six genes, was discovered to have a potentially important role in GBM, a finding that needs to be further studied.

Project description:PurposesCervical cancer (CC) is one of the highest frequently occurred malignant gynecological tumors with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Here, we aimed to identify significant genes associated with poor outcome. Materials and methods. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between CC tissues and normal cervical tissues were picked out by GEO2R tool and Venn diagram software. Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) was performed to analyze gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genome (KEGG) pathway. The protein-protein interactions (PPIs) of these DEGs were visualized by Cytoscape with Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING). Afterwards, Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to analyze the overall survival among these genes. The Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) was applied for further validation of the expression level of these genes.ResultsThe mRNA expression profile datasets of GSE63514, GSE27678, and GSE6791 were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO). In total, 76 CC tissues and 35 normal tissues were collected in the three profile datasets. There were totally 73 consistently expressed genes in the three datasets, including 65 up-regulated genes and 8 down-regulated genes. Of PPI network analyzed by Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) plug-in, all 65 up-regulated genes and 4 down-regulated genes were selected. The results of the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that 3 of the 65 up-regulated genes had a significantly worse prognosis, while 3 of the 4 down-regulated genes had a significantly better outcome. For validation in GEPIA, 4 of 6 genes (PLOD2, ANLN, AURKA, and AR) were confirmed to be significantly deregulated in CC tissues compared to normal tissues.ConclusionWe have identified three up-regulated (PLOD2, ANLN, and AURKA) and a down-regulated DEGs (AR) with poor prognosis in CC on the basis of integrated bioinformatical methods, which could be regarded as potential therapeutic targets for CC patients.

Project description:Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a common malignant tumor type of the nervous system. The purpose of the present study was to establish a regulatory network of immune-associated genes affecting the prognosis of patients with GBM. The GSE4290, GSE50161 and GSE2223 datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus database were screened to identify common differentially expressed genes (co-DEGs). A functional enrichment analysis indicated that the co-DEGs were mainly enriched in cell communication, regulation of enzyme activity, immune response, nervous system, cytokine signaling in immune system and the AKT signaling pathway. The co-DEGs accumulated in immune response were then further investigated. For this, the intersection of those co-DEGs and currently known immune-regulatory genes was obtained and a differential expression analysis of these overlapping immune-associated genes was performed. A risk model was established using immune-regulatory genes that affect the prognosis of patients with GBM. The risk score was significantly associated with the prognosis of patients with GBM and had a significant independent predictive value. The risk model had high accuracy in predicting the prognosis of patients with GBM [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)=0.764], which was higher than that of a previously reported model of prognosis-associated biomarkers (AUC=0.667). Furthermore, an interaction network was constructed by using immune-regulatory genes and transcription factors affecting the prognosis of patients with GBM and the University of California Santa Cruz database was used to perform a preliminary analysis of the transcription factors and immune genes of interest. The interaction network of immune-regulatory genes constructed in the present study enhances the current understanding of mechanisms associated with poor prognosis of patients with GBM. The risk score model established in the present study may be used to evaluate the prognosis of patients with GBM.

Project description:BackgroundLung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common subtype of lung cancer, representing 40% of all cases of this tumor. Despite immense improvements in understanding the molecular basis, diagnosis, and treatment of LUAD, its recurrence rate is still high.MethodsRNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) LUAD cohort were download from Genomic Data Commons Portal. The GSE13213 dataset from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) was used for external validation. Differential prognostic lysosome-related genes (LRGs) were identified by overlapping survival-related genes obtained via univariate Cox regression analysis with differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The prognostic model was built using Kaplan-Meier curves and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analyses. In addition, univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were employed to identify independent prognostic factors. The responses of patients to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were further predicted. The pRRophetic package and rank-sum test were used to compute the half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of 56 chemotherapeutic drugs and their differential effects in the low- and high-risk groups. Moreover, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, and human protein atlas (HPA) database were used to verify the expression of the four prognostic biomarkers in LUAD.ResultsOf the nine candidate differential prognostic LRGs, GATA2, TFAP2A, LMBRD1, and KRT8 were selected as prognostic biomarkers. The prediction of the risk model was validated to be reliable. Cox independent prognostic analysis revealed that risk score and stage were independent prognostic factors in LUAD. Furthermore, the nomogram and calibration curves of the independent prognostic factors performed well. Differential analysis of ICIs revealed CD276, ICOS, PDCD1LG2, CD27, TNFRSF18, TNFSF9, ENTPD1, and NT5E to be expressed differently in the low- and high-risk groups. The IC50 values of 12 chemotherapeutic drugs, including epothilone.B, JNK.inhibitor.VIII, and AKT.inhibitor.VIII, significantly differed between the two risk groups. KRT8 and TFAP2A were highly expressed, while GATA2 and LMBRD1 were poorly expressed in LUAD cell lines. In addition, KRT8 and TFAP2A were highly expressed, while GATA2 and LMBRD1 were poorly expressed in tumor tissues.ConclusionsFour key prognostic biomarkers-GATA2, TFAP2A, LMBRD1, and KRT8-were used to construct a significant prognostic model for LUAD patients.

Project description:Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive and most lethal primary malignant brain tumor, correlated with survival rates of less than one year from the time of diagnosis. Current surgical procedure attempts to remove the bulk of the tumor mass, whereas GBM frequently recurs within 1-3cm from the primary tumor resection site. Molecular mechanisms involved in the recurrence of the tumor are still poorly understood. The aim of the study was to define the molecular signature of GBM surrounding white matter (WM) in order to better understand the molecular mechanisms involved with tumor relapse. Material & Methods: Human GBM tumor bulk and surrounding tissue (1-3cm from the border of the tumor) were obtained from five patients who underwent total tumour resection, while normal white matter was harvested from patients who underwent surgical procedure for nonmalignant pathologies. Samples were processed for hybridization on the Affymetrix Human U133A arrays and data were examined with the GeneSpring analysis software. Results: Gene expression analysis of the samples was done in 2 independent steps. First, molecular profiling comparison of GBM surrounding WM and normal WM resulted in 59 genes differentially expressed between both tissues. Among these, numerous genes expressed by mature neural cells were down-regulated in GBM surrounding WM, while gene products supporting invasion were overexpressed. Moreover, KLRC1, a specific natural killer receptor naturally involved in the activation of antitumoral cells was drastically repressed in GBM surrounding WM, suggesting that the antitumoral immune surveillance is compromised in this tissue. Second, we focused our study on genes specifically regulated in GBM periphery respectively to GBM core. The highest up-regulated gene in GBM surrounding tissue encodes for DTX4, a regulator of NOTCH signalling pathway described for its key role in maintaining neural progenitors in an uncommitted state. Conclusion: This study revealed unique molecular characteristics of GBM surrounding tissue, showing the dysregulation of genes involved in immune surveillance along with genes associated to stemness maintenance. All together, these data may help to understand the molecular mechanisms associated with GBM recurrence This study attempted to define the molecular characteristics of the GBM surrounding tissue. To this end, GBM tumor samples were obtained from 5 patients who underwent total tumor resection. Surrounding tumor mass tissue was retrieved in all cases from not infiltrated white matter sited at 2 cm from the macroscopic tumor border. Furthermore, control white matter biopsies were harvested from patients operated on for deep intracerebral cavernomas. Each sample was hybridized onto Affymetrix human U133 arrays. For each patient, tumor core sample and surrounding tissue were harvested and are identified with the same suffix number. In 2 cases, (patients 3 and 4), two tumor peripheral tissue samples were harvested and are identified with the same number followed by "R" (replicate).