Fat Necrosis Following Application of a Tourniquet During Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Sammut K
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9304645 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Transcriptome profiling was performed on muscle biopsies from patients immediately before Total Knee Arthroplasty and two hours after TKA and tourniquet application.
2016-02-01 | GSE75432 | GEO
Project description:BackgroundThere is no consensus on how tourniquet and tranexamic acid (TXA) use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) affect blood transfusion rates and total blood loss. We compared outcome measures and transfusion rates after TKA, with and without the use of tourniquet and TXA.MethodsA retrospective study of 477 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA between 2008 and 2013 was performed. There were 243 in the tourniquet-assisted (TA) and 234 in the tourniquet-unassisted (TU) group. Operative times, hemoglobin levels, blood transfusion rates, complications, and length of stay were assessed. Subanalysis was performed on those patients receiving and not receiving TXA within the TU group.ResultsMean operative duration was 66.4 minutes in the TA group and 87.5 minutes in the TU group (P < .0001). Mean postoperative drop in hemoglobin was greater in TU group (3.1 g/dL vs 2.8 g/dL, P = .002). The transfusion rate was 9.5% in TA compared with 11.5% in TU patients (P = .46) with comparable mean units transfused (2.6 vs 2.2, P = .30). There was no difference in wound infection (P = .82) and total complication rates (P = .27) between groups. Those patients given TXA had a lower hemoglobin drop (2.6 g/dL vs 3.3 g/dL, P = .04) with similar transfusion (13.3% vs 11%, P = .61) and complication (P = .95) rates.ConclusionsTU TKA had a greater operative duration and postoperative drop in hemoglobin than TA TKA. However, transfusion rates were similar between groups. TXA use reduced the operative decrease in hemoglobin with no effect on complication or transfusion rates.Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective cohort study.
| S-EPMC7303488 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHigher tourniquet pressures may be associated with an increased risk of complications. We aimed to determine (1) whether a lower tourniquet pressure [systolic blood pressure (SBP) + 120 mmHg] is as effective as conventional tourniquet pressure (SBP + 150 mmHg) in providing a bloodless surgical field and decreasing blood loss, and (2) whether lowering the tourniquet pressure decreases tourniquet-related complications compared to conventional inflation pressure.MethodsOne hundred and sixty knees in 124 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomly allocated to either conventional (n = 80) or lower inflation pressure group (n = 80). The quality of the initial surgical field and occurrence of intraoperative blood oozing, hemoglobin drop, drained volume and calculated blood loss were assessed as efficacy variables. Safety outcome variables included post-operative pain, tourniquet site skin problems (ecchymosis, bullae, skin necrosis), and other tourniquet-related complications such as nerve palsy, venous thromboembolism, and delayed rehabilitation.ResultsA comparable bloodless surgical field was successfully provided in both groups (100% vs. 99%, p = 1.000). One case in the conventional pressure group and two cases in the lower pressure group showed intraoperative blood oozing (p = 1.000), which was successfully controlled after an increase of 30 mmHg in the tourniquet inflation pressure. There was no difference in the hemoglobin drop, drained volume, and calculated blood loss. The two groups did not differ in any safety outcomes such as post-operative pain, thigh complications, and other tourniquet related complications.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that a tourniquet inflation pressure of 120 mmHg above the SBP is effective method during TKA.Trial registrationThe trial was with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01993758 ) on November 25, 2013.
| S-EPMC6547572 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTourniquet application in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has many benefits and may have a role in the incidence of perioperative complications. Our aims were to examine the safety of applying a tourniquet for a limited amount of time during primary unilateral TKA (specifically, during cementation and final component fixation only) and to compare perioperative complications between the limited-application group and the full-application group.MethodsWe conducted a randomized controlled study of 62 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA. Patients were randomly allocated to either the limited or full tourniquet application. The follow-up period was 6 months. We evaluated intraoperative, postoperative, total, and hidden blood loss as the primary outcome measures and clearance of the surgical field, operative duration, and perioperative complications as the secondary outcome measures.ResultsWe found a significant difference in surgical field clearance between the groups. There was no significant difference in total, hidden, or postoperative blood loss between the groups. Mean intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the full-application group than in the limited-application group (171.742 ± 19.710 versus 226.258 ± 50.290 mL; p = 0.001). Perioperative complications, including allogeneic blood transfusion rates, did not significantly differ between the groups.ConclusionsLimited tourniquet application is safe to use in primary unilateral TKA and does not increase the incidence of perioperative complications or total blood loss when compared with a standard, full-time tourniquet application.Level of evidenceTherapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
| S-EPMC10697626 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The application of tranexamic acid (TXA) in total joint arthroplasty has dramatically improved peri-operative blood management. In light of these benefits, a study by Huang et al., "Intravenous and Topical Tranexamic Acid Alone Are Superior to Tourniquet Use for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty," evaluates the need for continued use of the intra-operative tourniquet, which remains a routine practice with documented benefits and adverse effects. This review evaluates the study's design and critically interprets its findings for clinical practice. Through a prospective, randomized trial, Huang et al. demonstrated that among selected patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty, the use of a tourniquet results in no reduction in blood loss beyond that provided by TXA alone. Moreover, the use of TXA without a tourniquet led to improved early clinical outcomes such as reduced post-operative swelling, improved knee range of motion at discharge, and enhanced patient satisfaction. As medicine is practiced in an increasingly value-driven environment, this study provides a useful method for evaluating the utility of commonly used interventions. Its findings highlight the need for future investigations into the optimal administration of TXA in total knee arthroplasty.
| S-EPMC6148574 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThere is little evidence on outcomes of tourniquet use during bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA). Tourniquet use in BTKA effects postoperative outcomes and efficiency inside the operating room. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of simultaneous tourniquet inflation in BTKA.Materials and methodsA retrospective review was performed on BTKA patients between March 2013 and May 2018. A total of 285 patients were divided into 2 cohorts. Patients in the simultaneous cohort had concomitant elevation of both tourniquets, but the sequential cohort did not. Perioperative variables were collected, and postoperative complications were tracked for a minimum of 90 days. Patients followed a uniform postoperative protocol. Complications were grouped by category to increase statistical power and compared using a noninferiority test. "Clinically noninferior" was defined as a margin ≤5%.ResultsThe simultaneous cohort had significantly (P < .05) higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class and smokers. Tourniquet time, delta hemoglobin, and surgical time were significantly lower. For the complication categories of "Any Thrombotic Event", "Respiratory", and "Soft Tissue/Wound", the difference in occurrence rates was no more than 2.8%, 2.8%, and 5.2% between cohorts, respectively. The "Cardiovascular (non-MI)" group was no more than 9.3% different, that is, authors are 95% confident that 3 of 4 complication categories meet the clinically noninferior threshold.ConclusionThe study demonstrates the noninferiority of simultaneous as compared to sequential tourniquet inflation in BTKA. Patients with cardiac history may need sequential inflation or staged TKA. The information presented in the study assists surgeons in safely and efficiently performing BTKA.
| S-EPMC7970319 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Purpose The effects of the commonly utilized intraoperative tourniquet on gene expression within the skeletal muscle cells are barely examined. Our group already showed that tourniquet application results in higher proteolytic activity within vastus medialis cells (KSSTA 2016), without influence on the amount and function of mitochondria (EJOT 2016). The purpose of the present study was to examine the gene expression within the skeletal muscle cells after tourniquet-induced ischemia and to identify differential expressed genes (DEGs). Methods As part of a randomized, controlled, monocentric trial (Clinical-Trials.gov NCT02475603) we included 20 patients scheduled to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The patients received a written consent and were randomly assigned to Group A (TKA with tourniquet) (n=10) and Group B (TKA without tourniquet) (n=10). Muscle biopsies of (5×5×5 mm) were obtained from the vastus medialis immediately after performing the surgical approach and exactly 60 min later. After preparation of a muscle homogenate, RNA extraction was performed (RNeasy Plus Universal Mini Kit Qiagen) and RNA integrity (RIN) was determined (Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer,RNA 6000 Pico Kit). Gene expression profiling was performed methodological validated (GeneChip™ Human Transcriptome Array 2.0;Affymetrix). Statistical analysis include the number of significant DEGs with p-value < 0,05, number of DEGs with relative difference >25% and pathway analysis (SPSS-Version 24; SAS JMP10 Genomics, Version 6). The power analysis considered an effect size of 0,4 and a statistical power > 0,8, sample size n=10 for each group. The protocol was approved by our Institutional Ethics Committee (File reference 2012-334N-MA). Results and conclusion Numerous genes were differencially expressed during tourniquet induced ischemia. Further investigations and statistical analysis are ongoning.
2021-01-01 | GSE124595 | GEO
Project description:ImportanceProphylactic administration of antibiotics before skin incision is an important component in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection in arthroplasty surgery. For antibiotics to be effective, the local tissue concentration (LTC) must exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration of typical infecting organisms; however, the LTC of cefazolin during arthroplasty is poorly understood.ObjectiveTo compare the systemic concentration of cefazolin in serum with the LTC in fat, synovium, and bone during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) while assessing the effect of tourniquet inflation.Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted from March 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, in patients undergoing TKA at a single academic center.InterventionTotal knee arthroplasty with or without a limb tourniquet.Main outcomes and measuresSystemic blood and local tissues from the surgical site (fat, synovium, and bone) were harvested at regular intervals during the surgery. The primary outcome was the LTC of cefazolin, quantified using the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry technique.ResultsA total of 59 patients were included in the study, with 29 in the tourniquet group (mean [SD] age, 69.3 [9.6] years; 23 [79.3%] female) and 30 in the no tourniquet group (mean [SD] age, 69.9 [9.7] years; 21 [70.0%] female). In patients undergoing TKA without a tourniquet, the mean concentration of cefazolin in serum was 71.9 μg/mL (95% CI, 66.4-77.5 μg/mL), whereas the mean LTCs were 13.9 μg/g (95% CI, 12.1-15.7 μg/g) in fat, 27.7 μg/g (95% CI, 24.3-31.0 μg/g) in synovium, and 17.7 μg/g (95% CI, 14.8-20.5 μg/g) in bone. For patients undergoing TKA with a tourniquet, the mean concentration of cefazolin in serum was 72.0 μg/mL (95% CI, 66.3-77.7 μg/mL), and the mean LTCs were 9.9 μg/g (95% CI, 8.7-11.1 μg/g) in fat, 21.8 μg/g (95% CI, 18.7-25.0 μg/g) in synovium, and 13.0 μg/g (95% CI, 10.8-15.2 μg/g) in bone. The use of a tourniquet resulted in significantly lower mean LTCs by 60 minutes after cefazolin infusion (10.8 μg/g [95% CI, 9.1-12.4 μg/g] vs 16.9 μg/g [95% CI, 14.1-19.6 μg/g], P = .001 in fat; 18.9 μg/g [95% CI, 14.1-23.6 μg/g] vs 25.8 μg/g [95% CI, 21.4-30.3 μg/g], P = .03 in synovium; and 11.8 μg/g [95% CI, 9.3-14.2 μg/g] vs 19.4 μg/g [95% CI, 14.5-24.4 μg/g], P = .007 in bone).Conclusions and relevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, the concentration of cefazolin was lower in local tissues (fat, synovium, and bone) than in systemic blood, and the use of a limb tourniquet further significantly reduced these concentrations. Although the current prophylactic dosing regimen for cefazolin provides sufficient serum concentrations, the levels in the periarticular tissue during TKA may be insufficient to prevent periprosthetic joint infection.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05604157.
| S-EPMC11344230 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Tourniquet application is still a common practice in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery despite being associated with several adverse effects. We evaluated the effects of tourniquet use on functional and clinical outcome and on knee range of motion (ROM).70 patients who underwent TKA were randomized into a tourniquet group (n = 35) and a non-tourniquet group (n = 35). All operations were performed by the same surgeon and follow-up was for 1 year. Primary outcomes were functional and clinical outcomes, as evaluated by KOOS and knee ROM. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative blood loss, surgical time and visibility, postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, and transfusion requirements.Patients in the non-tourniquet group showed a better outcome in all KOOS subscores and better early knee ROM from surgery to week 8. No difference was detected at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Postoperative pain and analgesic consumption were less when a tourniquet was not used. Surgical time and visibility were similar between groups. Intraoperative blood loss was greater when not using a tourniquet, but no postoperative transfusions were required.This study shows that TKA without the use of a tourniquet results in faster recovery in terms of better functional outcome and improved knee ROM. Furthermore, reduced pain and analgesic use were registered and no intraoperative difficulties were encountered.
| S-EPMC4105775 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe use of a tourniquet has become widely accepted as standard practice during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There are conflicting outcomes in using a tourniquet during TKA. This brings to question the role a tourniquet has in TKA. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine the effects of TKA with and without the use of a tourniquet.MethodsA total of 120 patients (n = 60 underwent TKA with tourniquet and n = 60 underwent TKA without tourniquet) were included in this study. Patient medical records were retrospectively reviewed for preoperative and postoperative data. The Gross formula, a validated formula for calculating blood loss, was used to calculate each patient's total blood loss. Statistical analysis was performed using independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and/or chi-square tests. Significance was determined using an alpha level of P < .05.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference (P = .49) in the amount of total blood loss between patients undergoing TKA with a tourniquet and those without (199.6 ± 92.2 mL vs 211.1 ± 88.1 mL, respectively). However, there were statistically significant differences in the operating room time (P = .005), surgery time (P = .008), and functional return of postoperative straight leg raise (P < .001) between groups.ConclusionsThis study supports existing evidence that tourniquet use during TKA does not significantly alter blood loss and presents evidence that using a tourniquet during TKA may add additional cost and increase surgical time without benefit.
| S-EPMC9493285 | biostudies-literature