Sapropterin for phenylketonuria: A Japanese post-marketing surveillance study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of sapropterin in a real-world setting in Japanese patients with tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4)-responsive phenylketonuria.Methods
This post-marketing surveillance study enrolled all of the patients in Japan with confirmed BH4-responsive PKU who were administrated sapropterin between July 2008 and October 2017. Patients were observed at least every 3 months during follow up, with key data collected on treatment exposure/duration, effectiveness according to physician's judgement, serum phenylalanine levels, and adverse events.Results
Of 87 enrolled patients, 85 patients (male, 42.4%; outpatients, 96.5%) were included in the safety and efficacy analysis sets. Treatment started at age <4 years in 43 (50.6%) patients and the most common starting daily dose was 5-10 mg/kg (n = 41, 48.2%) with the overall duration of treatment between 0.2 and 17.2 years. Serum phenylalanine levels, according to loading tests, reduced from a baseline level of 9.66 mg/dL (range 0.48-36.80 mg/dL) by >30% in 84 patients. Treatment was deemed effective in 79 of 85 patients (92.9%, 95% confidence interval: 85.3-97.4). One patient (1.2%) experienced an adverse drug reaction (alanine aminotransferase increased) 50 days after the start of administration, which resolved without complications with continued treatment.Conclusions
Sapropterin appears well tolerated and highly effective in Japanese patients treated in a real-world setting, including those who start treatment at age <4 years and pregnant women.
SUBMITTER: Tamura M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9305189 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundPhenylketonuria results from a deficiency of the enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase. Dietary restriction of phenylalanine keeps blood phenylalanine concentration low. Most natural foods are excluded from diet and supplements are used to supply other nutrients. Recent publications report a decrease in blood phenylalanine concentration in some patients treated with sapropterin dihydrochloride. We examined the evidence for the use of sapropterin dihydrochloride to treat phenylketonuria. This is an update of a previously published Cochrane Review. ObjectivesTo assess the safety and efficacy of sapropterin dihydrochloride in lowering blood phenylalanine concentration in people with phenylketonuria.Search methodsWe identified relevant trials from the Group's Inborn Errors of Metabolism Trials Register. Date of last search: 11 August 2014.We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and Current controlled trials. Last search: 4 September 2014We contacted the manufacturers of the drug (BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.) for information regarding any unpublished trials.Selection criteriaRandomized controlled trials comparing sapropterin with no supplementation or placebo in people with phenylketonuria due to phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency.Data collection and analysisTwo authors independently assessed trials and extracted outcome data.Main resultsTwo placebo-controlled trials were included. One trial administered 10 mg/kg/day sapropterin in 89 children and adults with phenylketonuria whose diets were not restricted and who had previously responded to saproterin.This trial measured change in blood phenylalanine concentration. The second trial screened 90 children (4 to 12 years) with phenylketonuria whose diet was restricted, for responsiveness to sapropterin. Forty-six responders entered the placebo-controlled part of the trial and received 20 mg/kg/day sapropterin. This trial measured change in both phenylalanine concentration and protein tolerance. Both trials reported adverse events. The trials showed an overall low risk of bias; but both are Biomarin-sponsored. One trial showed a significant lowering in blood phenylalanine concentration in the sapropterin group (10 mg/kg/day), mean difference -238.80 μmol/L (95% confidence interval -343.09 to -134.51); a second trial (20 mg/kg/day sapropterin) showed a non-significant difference, mean difference -51.90 μmol/L (95% confidence interval -197.27 to 93.47). The second trial also reported a significant increase in phenylalanine tolerance, mean difference18.00 mg/kg/day (95% confidence interval 12.28 to 23.72) in the 20 mg/kg/day sapropterin group.Authors' conclusionsThere is evidence of short-term benefit from using sapropterin in some people with sapropterin-responsive forms of phenylketonuria; blood phenylalanine concentration is lowered and protein tolerance increased. There are no serious adverse events associated with using sapropterin in the short term.There is no evidence on the long-term effects of sapropterin and no clear evidence of effectiveness in severe phenylketonuria.
| S-EPMC6769157 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVE:This surveillance study was conducted to verify the post-market safety and effectiveness of bevacizumab, which was approved in Japan in 2013 for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed and or recurrent malignant glioma. METHODS:This was a prospective, observational, multicenter post-marketing surveillance study. Patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent malignant glioma scheduled for bevacizumab treatment were enrolled. The incidence and severity of adverse drug reactions were calculated. The effectiveness of bevacizumab was assessed by the 1-year survival rate and the overall survival rate. RESULTS:The safety analysis set and the effectiveness analysis set each comprised 258 of the 268 enrolled patients: tumours were newly diagnosed in 80 patients (31%) and recurrent in 178 patients (68.9%). The incidence of grade ? 3 adverse drug reactions was 15.1%. Adverse drug reactions of special interest included 14 cerebral bleeding events and 11 infections. Of the 80 patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma, 44 (55%) were alive throughout the 18-month observation period. The 1-year survival rate for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma was 78%. Median overall survival was not calculated, but 51.2% of patients were alive at the last date of observation of the last observed patient. In patients with recurrent glioblastoma, the 1-year survival rate was 38.9%, and the median overall survival was 10.2 months. CONCLUSIONS:The results suggest no new safety concerns, and the effectiveness might be similar to previously reported data in clinical trials. Therefore, bevacizumab is considered as one of the treatment options for patients with malignant glioma in real-world clinical practice.
| S-EPMC6923818 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionIdarucizumab, a monoclonal antibody fragment, was developed to reverse the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran, and it was approved in Japan in September 2016. An all-case post-marketing surveillance is ongoing to collect data in Japanese patients treated with idarucizumab who had serious bleeding (Group A) or required an urgent procedure (Group B).MethodsThe primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The secondary endpoint was the maximum extent of reversal of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran based on activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) within 4 h after idarucizumab administration.ResultsThis interim analysis included 262 patients who received idarucizumab. Eighteen patients (6.9%) experienced ADRs within 4 weeks. The reversal effect of idarucizumab based on aPTT within 4 h after idarucizumab administration was assessed in 30 patients and the median maximum percentage reversal was 100%. In Group A, the median time to bleeding cessation in patients without intracranial bleeding was 3.3 h. In Group B, normal intraoperative hemostasis was reported in 63 patients (72.4%).ConclusionsThe results of this interim analysis suggest that idarucizumab is safe and effective for the reversal of dabigatran in Japanese patients in a real-world setting, and support the continued use of idarucizumab.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02946931.
| S-EPMC7237558 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Antiretroviral agents are approved in Japan based on non-clinical and clinical data reported from overseas. Neither the long-term tolerability nor the effectiveness of raltegravir or other integrase strand transfer inhibitors in Japan is known. This study reports on the long-term tolerability and effectiveness of raltegravir in Japanese clinical practice using data collected through approximately 9 years of post-marketing surveillance. This observational survey used data on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients initiated treatment with raltegravir between 2008 and 2017 in the HIV-related drug (HRD) cooperative survey to assess the safety and effectiveness of raltegravir in real world clinical practice. There were totally 1,303 patients prescribed raltegravir across 30 institutions; 1,293 patients and 1,178 patients were included for the safety and effectiveness analyses, respectively. The overall risk of adverse drug reaction was 17.25%, with abnormal hepatic function and hyperlipidaemia (<1.5%) having the highest proportion. Median HIV-1 RNA viral loads rapidly decreased below 40 copies/mL after 3 months of raltegravir use in treatment-naïve patients, and consistently sustained below 40 copies/mL after the start of raltegravir use in treatment-experienced patients. Among the patients who were treated for 7 years, 92.00% (95% CI: 73.97-99.02) maintained HIV-1 RNA viral load below 50 copies/mL. Additionally, CD4+ cell counts exceeded >500 cells/?L in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients after 3 years and 4 years of treatment, respectively. In Japanese HIV patients, long-term treatment with raltegravir is well-tolerated and effective at viral suppression as measured by HIV-1 RNA levels and subsequent change in CD4+ cell counts. Such benefits can be expected for not only treatment-naïve but also treatment-experienced patients.
| S-EPMC6326570 | biostudies-literature
Project description:INTRODUCTION:While dose escalation of golimumab has been used for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who demonstrate an inadequate response to the standard dose, its effectiveness has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome observed by dose escalation of golimumab for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the daily clinical setting. METHODS:A post hoc analysis was performed of data from the 24-week post-marketing surveillance conducted in Japan (n?=?5154). A total of 301 patients with moderate or high disease activity at baseline who underwent dose escalation of golimumab were assessed for effectiveness at 24 weeks based on several variables, such as DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI, as well as for medication persistence through 24 weeks. In addition, the study population was stratified by the time to dose escalation, and effectiveness was likewise evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with a moderate/good EULAR response to golimumab at 24 weeks. RESULTS:Patients with golimumab dose escalation showed significant improvement of the clinical signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis at 24 weeks, as indicated by reduction of the DAS28-CRP (?0.89), SDAI (?8.64), and CDAI (?8.28) scores. This result was relatively consistent across the subgroups stratified by the timing of dose escalation. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, 78.1% of the patients continued to receive golimumab at 24 weeks, and this was also similar among the subgroups stratified by the time to dose escalation. Multivariate analysis identified male sex and previous biologic therapy as factors that were significantly associated with the clinical response at 24 weeks. CONCLUSION:In real-world clinical practice, improvement of disease activity was observed after uptitration of golimumab from 50 to 100 mg regardless of the timing. Male patients and biologic-naive patients were more likely to respond to dose escalation of golimumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION:UMIN-CTR, Identifier: UMIN000015895.
| S-EPMC7211224 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSafety and effectiveness of aflibercept with 5-fluorouracil/levofolinate/irinotecan have not been reported in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a real-world clinical setting.MethodsThis post-marketing surveillance enrolled patients with un-resectable advanced or recurrent mCRC who were prescribed aflibercept from December 2017 to June 2019 in Japan. Data, collected up to 1 year from starting treatment, included patient background, safety, and effectiveness assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 or physician's evaluation.ResultsOf 261 patients registered from 64 centers, 235 [53.2% male with a median age of 67 years (range 28-84)] received treatment and were included in the safety analysis. Aflibercept was received at 1st, 2nd, and ≥ 3rd line in 1.3%, 48.1%, and 50.2% of patients, respectively. Median number of treatment cycles was 6 (range 1-22) and relative dose intensity was 75.4% (range 14.3-101.8%). Adverse events (all grades) were reported in 88.5% of patients, including neutropenia (34.5%), proteinuria (24.7%), hypertension (17.0%), diarrhea (17.0%), and decreased appetite (15.3%). Three treatment-related deaths occurred by perforation of the digestive tract, pneumonia and gastrointestinal bleeding, and sudden death. The effectiveness analysis included 198 patients. Overall response rate was 6.1% (1st line, 0%; 2nd line, 10.1%; ≥ 3rd line, 2.1%) and disease control rate was 47.5% (1st line, 100%; 2nd line, 58.6%; ≥ 3rd line, 34.4%).ConclusionNo new risks of aflibercept were identified in real clinical practice. Effectiveness in patients at the 2nd line was consistent with previous reports.
| S-EPMC9823052 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThis study was conducted to expand the sunitinib safety database in Japanese imatinib-resistant/-intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients. Retrospective analyses investigated common adverse events as potential prognostic markers.MethodsFour hundred and seventy patients who received sunitinib between June 2008 and November 2009 were analyzed for safety, progression-free survival and overall survival; 386 for objective response rate; 88% received sunitinib on Schedule 4/2 starting at 50 mg/day.ResultsNo unexpected safety issues occurred. Grade ? 3 adverse events occurred in 70%, most commonly thrombocytopenia (33%), neutropenia (22%) and leukopenia (15%). Objective response rate was 20% (95% confidence interval 16-24). Median progression-free survival was 22.4 weeks (95% confidence interval, 21.7-24.0). The overall survival rate at 24 weeks was 91% (95% confidence interval, 88-94). Higher relative dose intensity (?70 vs. <70%) during the first 6 weeks and better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs. ?1) were associated with longer progression-free survival (24.0 vs. 20.1 weeks; P = 0.011; and 24.1 vs. 16.9 weeks; P < 0.001) and higher 24-week overall survival rate (94 vs. 83%; P < 0.001; and 96 vs. 83%; P < 0.001). Increased progression-free survival and overall survival rates were associated with specific adverse events. Cox proportional hazard modeling adjusted for relative dose intensity and performance status established hand-foot syndrome (hazard ratio = 0.636; 95% confidence interval, 0.456-0.888) and leukopenia (hazard ratio = 0.683; 95% confidence interval, 0.492-0.948) occurring within 12 weeks were significantly correlated with increased progression-free survival.ConclusionSunitinib showed good efficacy and tolerable safety. Factors associated with greater efficacy were relative dose intensity, performance status and specific early adverse events.
| S-EPMC4622169 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionZoledronic acid (5 mg; ZOL), a once-yearly bisphosphonate, reduces osteoporotic fractures and increases bone mineral density (BMD). This 3-year post-marketing surveillance examined its real-world safety and effectiveness.Materials and methodsThis prospective, observational study included patients who started ZOL for osteoporosis. Data were assessed at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months for safety and effectiveness. Treatment persistence, potentially related factors, and persistence before and after the COVID-19 pandemic started were also investigated.ResultsThe safety analysis and effectiveness analysis sets included 1406 and 1387 patients, respectively, with mean age of 76.5 years. Adverse reactions (ARs) occurred in 19.35% of patients, with an acute-phase reaction in 10.31, 1.01, and 0.55% after the first, second, and third ZOL infusions. Renal function-related ARs, hypocalcaemia, jaw osteonecrosis, and atypical femoral fracture occurred in 1.71, 0.43, 0.43, and 0.07% of patients, respectively. Three-year cumulative fracture incidences were 4.44% for vertebral, 5.64% for non-vertebral, and 9.56% for clinical fractures. BMD increased by 6.79, 3.14, and 1.78% at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip, respectively, after 3-year treatment. Bone turnover markers remained within reference ranges. Treatment persistence was 70.34% over 2 years and 51.71% over 3 years. Male, age ≥ 75 years, no previous medicines for osteoporosis, no concomitant medicines for osteoporosis, and inpatient at the first infusion were related to discontinuation. There was no significant difference in the persistence rate between before and after the COVID-19 pandemic (74.7% vs. 69.9%; p = 0.141).ConclusionThis 3-year post-marketing surveillance confirmed the real-world safety and effectiveness of ZOL.
| S-EPMC9978276 | biostudies-literature
Project description:INTRODUCTION:International clinical trials have shown that linagliptin significantly improves glycemic control and can be used at a single dose regardless of renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, to date, no studies have evaluated the use of linagliptin in Japanese patients with T2D by renal function in routine clinical care. METHODS:This was a subgroup analysis of data from a prospective observational post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study of linagliptin conducted in Japan that evaluated the safety and effectiveness of linagliptin in routine clinical care for 3 years in Japanese patients with T2D. The subgroup analysis examined the patient population of this PMS study according to renal function using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) data. The incidence of linagliptin-related adverse events (adverse drug reactions [ADRs]) was the primary endpoint, and the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to last observation was the secondary endpoint. RESULTS:Of the 2235 patients included in the safety analysis, eGFR was ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (defined as group G1) in 16.9% (n = 377), ≥ 60 to < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (group G2) in 44.5% (n = 995), ≥ 30 to < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (group G3) in 21.7% (n = 486), ≥ 15 to < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (group G4) in 2.6% (n = 58) and < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 (group G5) in 1.7% (n = 37). No eGFR data were available for 12.6% (n = 282) of patients. In these GFR groups, the incidence of ADRs with linagliptin was 6.9% in group G1, 11.1% in group G2, 13.8% in group G3, 15.5% in group G4 and 16.2% in group G5; the change in HbA1c from baseline to the last observation was - 1.11, - 0.64, - 0.35, - 0.46 and - 0.54% in the respective subgroups. CONCLUSIONS:Long-term linagliptin use showed sustained improvements in glycemic control with no new safety concerns regardless of renal function. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01650259). FUNDING:This study was funded by Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd. and Eli Lilly Japan K.K.
| S-EPMC6995795 | biostudies-literature
Project description:INTRODUCTION:Clinical trials of linagliptin in Japanese patients conducted to date have had limited observational periods; therefore, there is a need for additional longer-term real-world data. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term safety and effectiveness of linagliptin in routine clinical practice. METHODS:This was a prospective, observational, post-marketing surveillance study conducted over 156 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who started linagliptin monotherapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The secondary endpoint was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to last available observation. Other effectiveness endpoints included the change in HbA1c and change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline to week 26 and over the course of the treatment period. RESULTS:Overall, 2235 and 2054 patients were included in the safety and effectiveness analysis sets, respectively. Patients were mostly male (58.4%), and the mean age was 66.7 years. The incidence of ADRs was 10.7% (n = 240). The most frequent ADRs according to MedDRA preferred terms were diabetes mellitus (n = 35 patients, 1.6%), constipation (n = 21, 0.9%), diabetes mellitus inadequate control (n = 13, 0.6%) and hypertension (n = 13, 0.6%). The mean change in HbA1c from baseline to last observation was - 0.67% [standard deviation (SD) 1.27%, 95% confidence interval - 0.72, - 0.61]. At week 26, HbA1c and FPG showed mean ± SD changes from baseline of - 0.73 ± 1.20% and - 21.02 ± 44.33 mg/dL, respectively, that were sustained until week 156. CONCLUSIONS:In Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, linagliptin produced sustained reductions in HbA1c and had a safety profile consistent with the established safety profile of linagliptin. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01650259).
| S-EPMC6965601 | biostudies-literature