Dataset Information

Circulating MicroRNAs as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common diabetic microvascular complication and a major cause of acquired vision loss. Finding effective biomarkers for the early identification and diagnosis of DR is crucial. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the accuracy of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the diagnosis of DR via a meta-analysis of previously published diagnostic studies. This study has been registered on the PROSPERO website, with the number CRD42022323238.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China Wanfang database, and China Knowledge Network database to identify relevant articles published from the time of database creation to April 10, 2022. Stata 14.0 software was used to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic ratio (DOR), and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the accuracy of miRNAs in the diagnosis of DR. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using Cochran-Q test and I² statistic for quantitative analysis. The random-effect model was selected due to significant heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis and regression analysis were also performed to determine the potential sources of heterogeneity.

Results

We included 25 articles detailing 52 studies with 1987 patients with DR and 1771 non-DR controls. The findings demonstrated overall sensitivity (0.82, 95% CI: 0.78 ~ 0.85), specificity (0.84, 95% CI: 0.81 ~ 0.86), PLR (5.0, 95% CI: 4.2 ~ 5.9), NLR (0.22, 95% CI: 0.18 ~ 0.26), and the area under the summary ROC curve (0.90, 95% CI: 0.87 ~ 0.92). Furthermore, we performed subgroup analysis and found that panels of multiple miRNAs could enhance the pooled sensitivity (sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values were 0.89, 0.87, and 0.94, respectively).

Conclusion

The meta-analysis showed that miRNAs can be used as potential diagnostic markers for DR, with high accuracy of diagnoses observed with the detection of miRNAs in plasma and serum.

SUBMITTER: Ma L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9309261 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:It is a global challenge to provide regular retinal screening for all people with diabetes to detect sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR). To determine if circulating biomarkers could be used to prioritize people with type 2 diabetes for retinal screening to detect STDR. This cross-sectional study collected data from October 22, 2018, to December 31, 2021. All laboratory staff were masked to the clinical diagnosis, assigned a study cohort, and provided with the database containing the clinical data. This was a multicenter study conducted in parallel in 3 outpatient ophthalmology clinics in the UK and 2 centers in India. Adults 40 years and older were categorized into 4 groups: (1) no history of diabetes, (2) type 2 diabetes of at least 5 years' duration with no evidence of DR, (3) nonproliferative DR with diabetic macular edema (DME), or (4) proliferative DR. STDR comprised groups 3 and 4. Thirteen previously verified biomarkers were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Severity of DR and presence of DME were diagnosed using fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography. Weighted logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (ROC) were performed to identify biomarkers that discriminate STDR from no DR beyond the standard clinical parameters of age, disease duration, ethnicity (in the UK) and hemoglobin A1c. A total of 538 participants (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [9.8] years; 319 men [59.3%]) were recruited into the study. A total of 264 participants (49.1%) were from India (group 1, 54 [20.5%]; group 2, 53 [20.1%]; group 3, 52 [19.7%]; group 4, 105 [39.8%]), and 274 participants (50.9%) were from the UK (group 1, 50 [18.2%]; group 2, 70 [25.5%]; group 3, 55 [20.1%]; group 4, 99 [36.1%]). ROC analysis (no DR vs STDR) showed that in addition to age, disease duration, ethnicity (in the UK) and hemoglobin A1c, inclusion of cystatin C had near-acceptable discrimination power in both countries (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.779; 95% CI, 0.700-0.857 in 215 patients in the UK with complete data; AUC, 0.696; 95% CI, 0.602-0.791 in 208 patients in India with complete data). Results of this cross-sectional study suggest that serum cystatin C had good discrimination power in the UK and India. Circulating cystatin-C levels may be considered as a test to identify those who require prioritization for retinal screening for STDR.

Project description:Backgrounds and Purpose: Currently, circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are considered to be non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers in a broad range of tumors. Nevertheless, so far, miRNAs have not been fully applied to the clinic for routine screening in glioma patients. Thus, our goal is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of circulating miRNAs for gliomas via a meta-analysis. The present study is registered on the PROSPERO website, with the number CRD42020195883. Methods: Literature retrieval was implemented in the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases using the established search strategy. We pooled the sensitivity, specificity, and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the included studies using the Stata 14.0 software. In addition, the heterogeneity between studies was assessed via the Q statistics and I 2 values calculated by a Chi-square test. A bivariate random effects model was selected due to significant heterogeneity. Specifically, for exploring the factors influencing the heterogeneity, we implemented subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Ultimately, a Deek's funnel plot asymmetry test was used to estimate the potential publication bias. Results: A total of 18 articles covering 24 studies were included, containing 2,170 glioma patients and 1,456 healthy participants. The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.84 (95%CI: 0.79-0.87), 0.84 (95%CI: 0.80-0.88), 5.3 (95%CI: 4.1-6.8), 0.19 (95%CI: 0.15-0.25), 27 (95%CI: 18-41), and 0.91 (95%CI: 0.88-0.93), respectively. Additionally, the findings revealed that serum miRNAs and miRNA panels presented superior diagnostic performance. Conclusion: Thus, circulating miRNAs have the potential to serve as diagnostic biomarkers for gliomas, but need to be verified via a large pool of prospective studies. Additionally, specific miRNAs still need to be elucidated in the diagnosis of a glioma, especially in the early screening stage. The findings may provide diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for the glioma population.