Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Leading countries in global science increasingly receive more citations than other countries doing similar research.


ABSTRACT: Citations and text analysis are both used to study the distribution and flow of ideas between researchers, fields and countries, but the resulting flows are rarely equal. We argue that the differences in these two flows capture a growing global inequality in the production of scientific knowledge. We offer a framework called 'citational lensing' to identify where citations should appear between countries but are absent given that what is embedded in their published abstract texts is highly similar. This framework also identifies where citations are overabundant given lower similarity. Our data come from nearly 20 million papers across nearly 35 years and 150 fields from the Microsoft Academic Graph. We find that scientific communities increasingly centre research from highly active countries while overlooking work from peripheral countries. This inequality is likely to pose substantial challenges to the growth of novel ideas.

SUBMITTER: Gomez CJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9314251 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6517957 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4653214 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7415021 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9884206 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4014449 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10781737 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10653582 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6302338 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4787535 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9728909 | biostudies-literature