Dataset Information

A Cost-Effectiveness Study Comparing Ready-to-Administer and Traditional Vial-and-Syringe Method for Opioids.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

The purpose of this study was to develop a cost-effectiveness model for manufacturer-prepared prefilled ready-to-administer (RTA) syringe products versus the traditional vial-and-syringe administration of intravenous (IV) opioids.

Methods

Cost parameters included cost of manufacturer-prepared prefilled RTA syringe product, traditional vial and syringe, drug preparation, drug administration, drug waste, and severity of error. Effectiveness endpoint included number of preparation and administration errors in each comparator arm. Simple decision tree was used, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as the reduction in the incremental errors per observation with RTA compared with traditional vial-and-syringe method. One-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to test the robustness of the model. TreeAge Pro software was used to create and analyze the decision model. All the cost parameters were converted to USD 2021.

Results

Base-case analysis showed that the cost of the RTA arm was lower by $182.61 and the number of errors in the RTA arm was lower by 94%, compared with the traditional vial-and-syringe arm. The manufacturer-prepared prefilled RTA syringe product was found to be cost-effective with an incremental savings of $22,554 per additional error avoided. Sensitivity analysis showed that ICER value was most sensitive to the probability of errors; however, the results were robust in showing that RTA is the preferred cost-effective option, when both the costs and effectiveness parameters were varied substantially.

Conclusion

This economic evaluation analyzed costs of using manufacturer-prepared prefilled RTA syringe product IV opioids and incremental benefits in terms of reduced errors, adverse events, and their associated costs. Manufacturer-prepared prefilled RTA syringe product was found to be cost-effective, demonstrating cost savings by reduction in the error rates. Integrating and adopting RTA syringe products within a health system could play an important role in improving care, building efficiency, increasing patient safety, and saving money.

SUBMITTER: Arora P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9314479 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceBuprenorphine is an effective and cost-effective medication to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), but is not readily available to many people with OUD in the US. The current cost-effectiveness literature does not consider interventions that concurrently increase buprenorphine initiation, duration, and capacity.ObjectiveTo conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis and compare interventions associated with increased buprenorphine treatment initiation, duration, and capacity.Design and settingThis study modeled the effects of 5 interventions individually and in combination using SOURCE, a recent system dynamics model of prescription opioid and illicit opioid use, treatment, and remission, calibrated to US data from 1999 to 2020. The analysis was run during a 12-year time horizon from 2021 to 2032, with lifetime follow-up. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis on intervention effectiveness and costs was conducted. Analyses were performed from April 2021 through March 2023. Modeled participants included people with opioid misuse and OUD in the US.InterventionsInterventions included emergency department buprenorphine initiation, contingency management, psychotherapy, telehealth, and expansion of hub-and-spoke narcotic treatment programs, individually and in combination.Main outcomes and measuresTotal national opioid overdose deaths, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, and costs from the societal and health care perspective.ResultsProjections showed that contingency management expansion would avert 3530 opioid overdose deaths over 12 years, more than any other single-intervention strategy. Interventions that increased buprenorphine treatment duration initially were associated with an increased number of opioid overdose deaths in the absence of expanded treatment capacity. With an incremental cost- effectiveness ratio of $19 381 per QALY gained (2021 USD), the strategy that expanded contingency management, hub-and-spoke training, emergency department initiation, and telehealth was the preferred strategy for any willingness-to-pay threshold from $20 000 to $200 000/QALY gained, as it was associated with increased treatment duration and capacity simultaneously.Conclusion and relevanceThis modeling analysis simulated the effects of implementing several intervention strategies across the buprenorphine cascade of care and found that strategies that were concurrently associated with increased buprenorphine treatment initiation, duration, and capacity were cost-effective.

Project description:Objective:Ready-made spectacles have been suggested as a less resource-intensive treatment for the millions of people living with uncorrected refractive error (URE) in low-income environments. In spite of this interest, there have been no published economic evaluations examining the cost-effectiveness of ready-made spectacles. This study aims to determine the relative cost-effectiveness of offering ready-made spectacles (RMS) relative to no intervention as well as the relative cost-effectiveness of custom-made spectacles (CS) relative to RMS to treat URE. Methods and analysis:The relative cost-effectiveness of RMS relative to CS and no intervention was tested through a cost-effectiveness analysis from the health service provider perspective conducted alongside a double-masked randomised controlled trial in an urban hospital in Delhi, India. Participants were adults aged 18-45 years with ?1?dioptre (D) of URE. Results:There was no significant difference between the effectiveness of the CS and RMS interventions in improving visual acuity, but the CS was over four times the price of the RMS per patient (204 INR (US$2.42) and 792 INR (US$11.22)). The cost per unit improvement in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) relative to baseline with the RMS intervention was 407 INR (US$4.35). Existing estimates of utility resulting from improvements in visual acuity result in incremental cost per quality-adjusted life years gained of between 212 INR and 1137 INR (US$0.44-US$23.74) depending on the source of the utility estimate and assumed expected life of the spectacles. Conclusion:RMS represent a significantly cost-effective option for spectacle provision in low-resource settings. The RMS programme was substantially cheaper than an equivalent CS intervention while being effective in improving visual acuity for the majority of adults with refractive error in this setting. These findings provide further support for including RMS in programmes to address URE. Trial registration number:NCT00657670, Results.