Dataset Information

Machine Learning and Electrocardiography Signal-Based Minimum Calculation Time Detection for Blood Pressure Detection

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Measurement and monitoring of blood pressure are of great importance for preventing diseases such as cardiovascular and stroke caused by hypertension. Therefore, there is a need for advanced artificial intelligence-based systolic and diastolic blood pressure systems with a new technological infrastructure with a noninvasive process. The study is aimed at determining the minimum ECG time required for calculating systolic and diastolic blood pressure based on the Electrocardiography (ECG) signal. Methodology. The study includes ECG recordings of five individuals taken from the IEEE database, measured during daily activity. For the study, each signal was divided into epochs of 2-4-6-8-10-12-14-16-18-20 seconds. Twenty-five features were extracted from each epoched signal. The dimension of the dataset was reduced by using Spearman's feature selection algorithm. Analysis based on metrics was carried out by applying machine learning algorithms to the obtained dataset. Gaussian process regression exponential (GPR) machine learning algorithm was preferred because it is easy to integrate into embedded systems.

Results

The MAPE estimation performance values for diastolic and systolic blood pressure values for 16-second epochs were 2.44 mmHg and 1.92 mmHg, respectively.

Conclusion

According to the study results, it is evaluated that systolic and diastolic blood pressure values can be calculated with a high-performance ratio with 16-second ECG signals.

SUBMITTER: Nour M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9325348 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLogistic regression-based signal detection algorithms have benefits over disproportionality analysis due to their ability to handle potential confounders and masking factors. Feature exploration and developing alternative machine learning algorithms can further strengthen signal detection.ObjectivesOur objective was to compare the signal detection performance of logistic regression, gradient-boosted trees, random forest and support vector machine models utilizing Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system data.DesignCross-sectional study.MethodsThe quarterly data extract files from 1 October 2017 through 31 December 2020 were downloaded. Due to an imbalanced outcome, two training sets were used: one stratified on the outcome variable and another using Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE). A crude model and a model with tuned hyperparameters were developed for each algorithm. Model performance was compared against a reference set using accuracy, precision, F1 score, recall, the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROCAUC), and the precision-recall curve area under the curve (PRCAUC).ResultsModels trained on the balanced training set had higher accuracy, F1 score and recall compared to models trained on the SMOTE training set. When using the balanced training set, logistic regression, gradient-boosted trees, random forest and support vector machine models obtained similar performance evaluation metrics. The gradient-boosted trees hyperparameter tuned model had the highest ROCAUC (0.646) and the random forest crude model had the highest PRCAUC (0.839) when using the balanced training set.ConclusionAll models trained on the balanced training set performed similarly. Logistic regression models had higher accuracy, precision and recall. Logistic regression, random forest and gradient-boosted trees hyperparameter tuned models had a PRCAUC ⩾ 0.8. All models had an ROCAUC ⩾ 0.5. Including both disproportionality analysis results and additional case report information in models resulted in higher performance evaluation metrics than disproportionality analysis alone.