Dataset Information

TriHy: teaching an MA TESOL class face-to-face, synchronously online, and asynchronously online

ABSTRACT: This study investigated whether the success of students in a Master of Arts in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (MA TESOL) assessment course was comparable regardless of their chosen mode of attendance (face-to-face, synchronously online, asynchronously online) in this “Triple Hybrid” (or “TriHy”) class. In an interactive, convergent, mixed-methods design, a pragmatic, participant-focused framework guided the study. Data collection extended to pre-, while-, and post-surveys of the participants; tracking of mode of communication with the instructor; as well as proxies for students’ success in the course, including the rate of course completion, weekly class attendance, completion of weekly assignments, grades on low-stakes individual assignments, grades on a high-stakes individual assignment, and a final course grade. The findings of the quantitative and qualitative analyses revealed that overall there was no statistically significant difference in the learning outcomes among the modalities even though one of the groups’ pre-test scores did differ from the others’ significantly. Although the students’ success in the course did not differ, their perception of the factors that contributed to their success did. The findings suggest that with considerable institutional support, substantial investment of time and commitment from the instructor, and meaningful choices from the students, the quality of instruction even in a language-teacher-preparation course focused on skill building does not need to be compromised.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43545-022-00434-4.

SUBMITTER: Porter-Szucs I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9328648 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMajor disruptions imposed on medical education by the COVID-19 pandemic and the rapid shift to online teaching in medical programs, necessitated need for evaluation of this format. In this study we directly compared knowledge outcomes, social outcomes, and wellbeing of first year student small group teaching in either face to face (f2f) or online format.MethodsAt the end of the first course of our medical program, students were invited to participate in an online questionnaire with 10 quantitative items and 1 qualitative item. These were analysed using Factor Analysis Pattern Matrix and linear regression to group items and assess relatedness. Qualitative responses were thematized using Qualtrics software (Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA). Summative assessment results were compared, both between current cohorts to historical cohorts.ResultsFrom a cohort of 298 students there was a 77% response rate. Overall, there were no differences in knowledge gains, either between groups or when compared to historical cohorts. Questionnaire items fell reliably into groups that related to either learning outcomes, social outcomes, or wellbeing. Independent T tests showed that format for teaching (online versus f2f) had an impact on social outcomes but no direct impact on learning outcomes. Linear regression revealed that the social outcomes have a direct impact on wellbeing and almost the double the impact on learning outcomes than mode of learning i.e.. F2f or online (β = .448 and β = .232 respectively).ConclusionIn this study, we were able to show with statistical strength that social outcomes for students such as engaging with peers and facilitator, contributing to the group, and making friends have a direct impact on wellbeing and indirectly impact learning outcomes (such as motivation, satisfaction, integration of knowledge). In a rapidly changing educational landscape, in our opinion, it is vital that these aspects are a focus of design and delivery of medical education. The data from this study supports the notion that activity design and the expertise of the teacher in facilitating the small group activities, has greater impact than the mode of educational delivery itself on students' learning processes.

Project description:IntroductionOnline teaching has rapidly emerged as a viable alternative to traditional face-to-face education. How to teach surgical skills in the online environment, however, has not yet been fully established nor evaluated.MethodsAn international 1-day online surgical skills course consisting of lectures, pre-recorded virtual workshops, live demonstrations and along with surgical skills teaching in breakout rooms was organised. Based on existing learning theories, new methods were developed to deliver skills teaching online. Simultaneously, traditional in-person surgical skills teaching was also conducted and used as a benchmark. Skills development was assessed by trained demonstrators and self-reported competency scores were compared between the online and face-to-face event.Results553 delegates from 20 different countries attended the online course. Of these, 64 were trained in breakout rooms with a 1:5 demonstrator-to-delegate ratio whilst the remaining 489 delegates participated in didactic skills development sessions. In a separate face-to-face course, 20 delegates were trained with traditional methods. Demonstrators rated the competency of delegates for suturing, tendon repair and vascular anastomosis. There was no significant difference in the competency ratings of delegates receiving online teaching or face-to-face teaching (p = 0.253, p = 0.084, p = 1.00, respectively). The development of the same skills to "articulation" were not different between formats (p = 0.841, p = 0.792, p = 1.00, respectively). Post course self-rated competency scores improved for all technical skills (p < 0.001). Small group sessions, both online and face-to-face, received higher satisfaction ratings compared to large group sessions in terms of clarity of instructions, answers to questions and demonstrator feedback. Overall feedback on teaching quality, however, was equivalent across both groups.DiscussionOnline teaching of surgical skills for early training years is an appropriate alternative to face-to-face teaching.

Dataset Information

TriHy: teaching an MA TESOL class face-to-face, synchronously online, and asynchronously online

Supplementary Information

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets