Dataset Information

Systems Genetic Identification of Mitochondrion-Associated Alzheimer's Disease Genes and Implications for Disease Risk Prediction.

ABSTRACT: Cumulative evidence has revealed the association between mitochondrial dysfunction and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Because the number of mitochondrial genes is very limited, the mitochondrial pathogenesis of AD must involve certain nuclear genes. In this study, we employed systems genetic methods to identify mitochondrion-associated nuclear genes that may participate in the pathogenesis of AD. First, we performed a mitochondrial genome-wide association study (MiWAS, n = 809) to identify mitochondrial single-nucleotide polymorphisms (MT-SNPs) associated with AD. Then, epistasis analysis was performed to examine interacting SNPs between the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Weighted co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was applied to transcriptomic data from the same sample (n = 743) to identify AD-related gene modules, which were further enriched by mitochondrion-associated genes. Using hub genes derived from these modules, random forest models were constructed to predict AD risk in four independent datasets (n = 743, n = 542, n = 161, and n = 540). In total, 9 potentially significant MT-SNPs and 14,340 nominally significant MT-nuclear interactive SNPs were identified for AD, which were validated by functional analysis. A total of 6 mitochondrion-related modules involved in AD pathogenesis were found by WGCNA, from which 91 hub genes were screened and used to build AD risk prediction models. For the four independent datasets, these models perform better than those derived from AD genes identified by genome-wide association studies (GWASs) or differential expression analysis (DeLong's test, p < 0.05). Overall, through systems genetics analyses, mitochondrion-associated SNPs/genes with potential roles in AD pathogenesis were identified and preliminarily validated, illustrating the power of mitochondrial genetics in AD pathogenesis elucidation and risk prediction.

SUBMITTER: Xu X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9330299 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundUsing interpretable machine learning, we sought to define the immune microenvironment subtypes and distinctive genes in AD.MethodsssGSEA, LASSO regression, and WGCNA algorithms were used to evaluate immune state in AD patients. To predict the fate of AD and identify distinctive genes, six machine learning algorithms were developed. The output of machine learning models was interpreted using the SHAP and LIME algorithms. For external validation, four separate GEO databases were used. We estimated the subgroups of the immunological microenvironment using unsupervised clustering. Further research was done on the variations in immunological microenvironment, enhanced functions and pathways, and therapeutic medicines between these subtypes. Finally, the expression of characteristic genes was verified using the AlzData and pan-cancer databases and RT-PCR analysis.ResultsIt was determined that AD is connected to changes in the immunological microenvironment. WGCNA revealed 31 potential immune genes, of which the greenyellow and blue modules were shown to be most associated with infiltrated immune cells. In the testing set, the XGBoost algorithm had the best performance with an AUC of 0.86 and a P-R value of 0.83. Following the screening of the testing set by machine learning algorithms and the verification of independent datasets, five genes (CXCR4, PPP3R1, HSP90AB1, CXCL10, and S100A12) that were closely associated with AD pathological biomarkers and allowed for the accurate prediction of AD progression were found to be immune microenvironment-related genes. The feature gene-based nomogram may provide clinical advantages to patients. Two immune microenvironment subgroups for AD patients were identified, subtype2 was linked to a metabolic phenotype, subtype1 belonged to the immune-active kind. MK-866 and arachidonyltrifluoromethane were identified as the top treatment agents for subtypes 1 and 2, respectively. These five distinguishing genes were found to be intimately linked to the development of the disease, according to the Alzdata database, pan-cancer research, and RT-PCR analysis.ConclusionThe hub genes associated with the immune microenvironment that are most strongly associated with the progression of pathology in AD are CXCR4, PPP3R1, HSP90AB1, CXCL10, and S100A12. The hypothesized molecular subgroups might offer novel perceptions for individualized AD treatment.

Project description:BACKGROUND:New genetic and genomic resources have identified multiple genetic risk factors for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) and characterized this common dementia at the molecular level. Experimental studies in model organisms can validate these associations and elucidate the links between specific genetic factors and transcriptomic signatures. Animal models based on LOAD-associated genes can potentially connect common genetic variation with LOAD transcriptomes, thereby providing novel insights into basic biological mechanisms underlying the disease. METHODS:We performed RNA-Seq on whole brain samples from a panel of six-month-old female mice, each carrying one of the following mutations: homozygous deletions of Apoe and Clu; hemizygous deletions of Bin1 and Cd2ap; and a transgenic APOE?4. Similar data from a transgenic APP/PS1 model was included for comparison to early-onset variant effects. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to identify modules of correlated genes and each module was tested for differential expression by strain. We then compared mouse modules with human postmortem brain modules from the Accelerating Medicine's Partnership for AD (AMP-AD) to determine the LOAD-related processes affected by each genetic risk factor. RESULTS:Mouse modules were significantly enriched in multiple AD-related processes, including immune response, inflammation, lipid processing, endocytosis, and synaptic cell function. WGCNA modules were significantly associated with Apoe-/-, APOE?4, Clu-/-, and APP/PS1 mouse models. Apoe-/-, GFAP-driven APOE?4, and APP/PS1 driven modules overlapped with AMP-AD inflammation and microglial modules; Clu-/- driven modules overlapped with synaptic modules; and APP/PS1 modules separately overlapped with lipid-processing and metabolism modules. CONCLUSIONS:This study of genetic mouse models provides a basis to dissect the role of AD risk genes in relevant AD pathologies. We determined that different genetic perturbations affect different molecular mechanisms comprising AD, and mapped specific effects to each risk gene. Our approach provides a platform for further exploration into the causes and progression of AD by assessing animal models at different ages and/or with different combinations of LOAD risk variants.

Dataset Information

Systems Genetic Identification of Mitochondrion-Associated Alzheimer's Disease Genes and Implications for Disease Risk Prediction.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets