Dataset Information

Preferences of Dairy Cattle for Supplemental Light-Emitting Diode Lighting in the Resting Area.

ABSTRACT: Light from the environment is important for vision and regulating various biological processes. Providing supplemental lighting in the stall area could allow for individually targeted or group-level control of light. This study aimed to determine whether dairy cattle had preferences for short-term exposure to white (full-spectrum) light-emitting diode (LED) light or no LED light, yellow-green or white LED light, and blue or white LED light in the stall area. In total, 14 lactating cows were housed in a free-stall pen with unrestricted access to 28 stalls. LED light was controlled separately for each side of the stall platform. Two combinations of light were tested per week, and each week consisted of three adaptation days and four treatment days. Lying behaviour and video data were recorded continuously using leg-mounted pedometers and cameras, respectively. Preference was assessed by the amount of time spent lying and the number of bouts under each light treatment. No differences occurred between treatments within each week for daily lying time and number of bouts. Similarly, no differences occurred between treatments within each time period. Further controlled studies of long-term exposure to different LED wavelengths and intensities are required to determine potential benefits on metabolic processes.

SUBMITTER: Wilson AM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9331357 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Conventional approaches to improve the quality of clinical patient imaging studies focus predominantly on updating or replacing imaging equipment; however, it is often not considered that patients can also highly influence the diagnostic quality of clinical imaging studies. Patient-specific artifacts can limit the diagnostic image quality, especially when patients are uncomfortable, anxious, or agitated. Imaging facility or environmental conditions can also influence the patient's comfort and willingness to participate in diagnostic imaging studies, especially when performed in visually unesthetic, anxiety-inducing, and technology-intensive imaging centers. When given the opportunity to change a single aspect of the environmental or imaging facility experience, patients feel much more in control of the otherwise unfamiliar and uncomfortable setting. Incorporating commercial, easily adaptable, ambient lighting products within clinical imaging environments allows patients to individually customize their environment for a more personalized and comfortable experience. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this pilot study was to use a customizable colored light-emitting diode (LED) lighting system within a clinical imaging environment and demonstrate the feasibility and initial findings of enabling healthy subjects to customize the ambient lighting and color. Improving the patient experience within clinical imaging environments with patient-preferred ambient lighting and color may improve overall patient comfort, compliance, and participation in the imaging study and indirectly contribute to improving diagnostic image quality. METHODS:We installed consumer-based internet protocol addressable LED lights using the ZigBee standard in different imaging rooms within a clinical imaging environment. We recruited healthy volunteers (n=35) to generate pilot data in order to develop a subsequent clinical trial. The visual perception assessment procedure utilized questionnaires with preprogrammed light/color settings and further assessed how subjects preferred ambient light and color within a clinical imaging setting. RESULTS:Technical implementation using programmable LED lights was performed without any hardware or electrical modifications to the existing clinical imaging environment. Subject testing revealed substantial variabilities in color perception; however, clear trends in subject color preference were noted. In terms of the color hue of the imaging environment, 43% (15/35) found blue and 31% (11/35) found yellow to be the most relaxing. Conversely, 69% (24/35) found red, 17% (6/35) found yellow, and 11% (4/35) found green to be the least relaxing. CONCLUSIONS:With the majority of subjects indicating that colored lighting within a clinical imaging environment would contribute to an improved patient experience, we predict that enabling patients to customize environmental factors like lighting and color to individual preferences will improve patient comfort and patient satisfaction. Improved patient comfort in clinical imaging environments may also help to minimize patient-specific imaging artifacts that can otherwise limit diagnostic image quality. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03456895; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03456895.

Project description:Supplemental interlighting is commonly used in modern greenhouses to improve light deficiency, but the light spectrum affects fruit quality and color change. This study aimed to analyze the effect of interlighting with red, blue, and additional far-red light on the fruit qualities and carotenoid contents of red and yellow sweet peppers (Capsicum annuum L.). Three light treatments were applied: natural light (NL), NL with red + blue LED interlighting (71 μmol m-2 s-1) (RB), and RB with far-red light (55 μmol m-2 s-1) (RBFR). Ascorbic acid, free sugars, and individual carotenoid content were quantified with HPLC analysis. Fruits were sampled on 2020.11.14 (Group 1) and 2021.01.03 (Group 2) from the plants grown under average light intensities of 335.9 and 105.6 μmol m-2 s-1, respectively. In the overall period, total yields in RB and RBFR were 22 and 33% higher than those in NL in red fruits and 2 and 21% higher in yellow fruits, respectively. In both colored fruits, ascorbic acid, total soluble sugar, and carotenoid content were higher in RB and RBFR than NL. In Group 1, ascorbic acid and total soluble sugar were significantly different between RB and RBFR only in red fruits. In Group 2, ascorbic acids in red and yellow fruits were 9 and 3% higher in RBFR than RB but total soluble sugars were 4 and 2% lower, respectively. Carotenoid contents in red and yellow fruits were 3.0- and 2.1-fold higher in RB and 2.0- and 1.4-fold higher in RBFR than those in NL, respectively. In this study, interlighting had a significant impact on fruit quality in Group 2, mainly due to the increase in the ratio of interlighting to total light by seasonal changes. In particular, red and yellow fruit yields were 9% and 19% higher in RBFR than RB, but carotenoid contents were 26 to 9% lower, respectively. This result exhibited that additional far-red lighting has a trade-off relationship between fruit yield and carotenoid content. Thus, it is necessary to provide an adequate light spectrum according to a specific cultivation purpose, such as improving yield or accumulating plastids in fruits.

Dataset Information

Preferences of Dairy Cattle for Supplemental Light-Emitting Diode Lighting in the Resting Area.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets