Evolution of sedation management in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Stollings JL
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9334735 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Evolution of sedation management in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Stollings Joanna L JL Balas Michelle C MC Chanques Gerald G
Intensive care medicine 20220729 11
Similar Datasets
Project description:Purpose of reviewThis narrative review illustrates literature over the last 5 years relating to sedation delivery to mechanically ventilated adult patients in intensive care units.Recent findingsThere has been an increase in dexmedetomidine-related publications but although systematic reviews suggest dexmedetomidine reduces delirium, agitation, and length of stay, clinical trials have not supported these findings. It is likely to be useful for the managing patients with persisting agitation. Guidelines continue to recommend lightly sedating patients but considerable variation remains in clinical practice and in research trials. Protocols with no sedative infusions and morphine boluses as needed are feasible and safe, while educational interventions can decrease sedation-related adverse events.SummaryResearch trials have mainly focused on individual drugs rather than practice. Given evidence is slow to translate into practice; work is needed to understand and respond to the concerns of clinicians regarding deep sedation and agitation.
| S-EPMC8065316 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10932732 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeA task force of experts from 11 United States (US) centers, sought to describe practices for managing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell toxicity in the intensive care unit (ICU).Materials and methodsBetween June-July 2019, a survey was electronically distributed to 11 centers. The survey addressed: CAR products, toxicities, targeted treatments, management practices and interventions in the ICU.ResultsMost centers (82%) had experience with commercial and non-FDA approved CAR products. Criteria for ICU admission varied between centers for patients with Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) but were similar for Immune Effector Cell Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS). Practices for vasopressor support, neurotoxicity and electroencephalogram monitoring, use of prophylactic anti-epileptic drugs and tocilizumab were comparable. In contrast, fluid resuscitation, respiratory support, methods of surveillance and management of cerebral edema, use of corticosteroid and other anti-cytokine therapies varied between centers.ConclusionsThis survey identified areas of investigation that could improve outcomes in CAR T-cell recipients such as fluid and vasopressor selection in CRS, management of respiratory failure, and less common complications such as hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, infections and stroke. The variability in specific treatments for CAR T-cell toxicities, needs to be considered when designing future outcome studies of critically ill CAR T-cell patients.
| S-EPMC7321897 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNeonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) undergo a multitude of painful and stressful procedures during the first days of life. Stress from this pain can lead to neurodevelopmental problems that manifest in later childhood and should be prevented.ObjectiveTo determine the number of painful procedures performed per day for each neonate, to verify documentation of painful procedures performed, and to, subsequently, note missed opportunities for providing pain relief to neonates.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study at a level III NICU located in a rural part of western India. A total of 69 neonates admitted for more than 24 h were included. Twenty-nine neonates were directly observed for a total of 24 h each, and another 40 neonatal records were retrospectively reviewed for the neonate's first 7 days of admission. All stressful and painful procedures performed on the neonate were recorded. Also recorded were any pharmaceutical pain relief agents or central nervous system depressants administered to the neonate before or at the time of the procedures. Average nurse-patient ratio was also calculated. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.ResultsA documentation deficit of 2.2% was observed. The average nurse-patient ratio was 1.53:1. A total of 13711 procedures were recorded, yielding 44.1 (38.1 stressful, 3.8 mildly painful, and 2.2 moderately painful) procedures per patient day. Common stressful procedures were position changing (2501) and temperature recording (2208). Common mildly and moderately painful procedures were heel prick (757) and endotracheal suctioning (526), respectively. Use of pharmacological agents coincided with 33.48% of the procedures. The choice of drug and time of administration were inappropriate, indicating that the pharmacological agents were intended not for pain relief but rather for a coexisting pathology or as sedation from ventilation with no analgesia.ConclusionStressful procedures are common in the NICU; mildly and moderately painful procedures fairly common. Almost two-thirds of the times, no pharmaceutical pain relief methods were used, and when administered, the pharmaceutical agents were seldom intended for pain relief; this implies poor pain management practices and emphasizes the imperative need for educating NICU nurses, residents, fellows, and attendings.
| S-EPMC4763094 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Comfort of the critically unwell pediatric patient is paramount to ensuring good outcomes. Analgesia-based, multimodal sedative approaches are the foundation for comfort, whereby pain is addressed first and then sedation titrated to a predefined target based on the goals of care. Given the heterogeneity of patients within the pediatric critical care population, the approach must be individualized based on the age and developmental stage of the child, physiologic status, and degree of invasive treatment required. In both the adult and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), sedation titration is practiced as standard of care to meet therapeutic goals with a focus on facilitating early rehabilitation and extubation while avoiding under- and over-sedation. Sedation protocols have been developed as methods to reduce variability and optimize goal-directed therapy. Components of a sedation protocol include routine analgesia and sedation scoring with validated tools at specified intervals and a predefined algorithm that allows the titration of analgesia and sedation based on those assessments. Sedation protocols are designed to improve communication and documentation of sedation goals while also empowering the bedside team to respond rapidly to changes in a patient's clinical status. Previously it was thought that sedation protocols would consistently reduce duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and length of stay (LOS) for patients in the PICU, however, this has not been the case. Nonetheless, introduction of sedation protocols has provided several benefits, including: (I) reduction in benzodiazepine usage; (II) improvements in interprofessional communication surrounding sedation goals and management of sedation goals; and (III) reductions in iatrogenic withdrawal symptoms. Successful implementation of sedation protocols requires passionate clinical champions and a robust implementation, education, and sustainability plan. Emerging evidence suggests that sedation protocols as part of a bundle of quality improvement initiatives will form the basis of future studies to improve short- and long-term outcomes after PICU discharge. In this review, we aim to define sedation protocols in the context of pediatric critical care and highlight important considerations for clinical practice and research.
| S-EPMC8578750 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to evaluate sedation practice in UK intensive care units (ICUs), particularly the implementation of daily sedation holding, written sedation guidelines, sedation scoring tools and choice of agents.MethodsA national postal survey was conducted in all UK ICUs.ResultsA total of 192 responses out of 302 addressed units were received (63.5%). Of the responding ICUs, 88% used a sedation scoring tool, most frequently the Ramsey Sedation Scale score (66.4%). The majority of units have a written sedation guideline (80%), and 78% state that daily sedation holding is practiced. A wide variety of sedating agents is used, with the choice of agent largely determined by the duration of action rather than cost. The most frequently used agents were propofol and alfentanil for short-term sedation; propofol, midazolam and morphine for longer sedation; and propofol for weaning purposes.ConclusionsMost UK ICUs use a sedation guideline and sedation scoring tool. The concept of sedation holding has been implemented in the majority of units, and most ICUs have a written sedation guideline.
| S-EPMC2646317 | biostudies-literature
Project description:intensive care unit shotgun raw sequences Metagenome
| PRJNA562118 | ENA
Project description:BackgroundDelirium is an underdiagnosed condition and this may be related, among other causes, to the incorrect use of assessment tools due to lack of knowledge about cognitive assessment and lack of training of the care team. The aim of this study was to investigate the difficulties encountered by the nursing team in the application of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) in patients on mechanical ventilation.MethodsThis is descriptive study with a qualitative approach in a private tertiary hospital located in northeast Brazil. Data collection took place from July 2018 to January 2019. We included 32 nurses and used face-to-face semi-structured interviews. The recorded data were analysed using content analysis. This study followed the recommendations of the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).ResultsWe identified three major categories: lack of knowledge of professionals, subdivided into deficit in academic formation, difficulty in the differential diagnosis of delirium and delusion, and lack of knowledge about the steps of the CAM-ICU; difficulty in patient cooperation; and lack of adequate training to apply the CAM-ICU.ConclusionNurses have a deficit in academic formation on delirium and need adequate training for the correct and frequent use of the CAM-ICU.
| S-EPMC9685965 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThe medication regimen complexity-intensive care unit (MRC-ICU) score has been developed and validated as an objective predictive metric for patient outcomes and pharmacist workload in the adult critically ill population. The purpose of this study was to explore the MRC-ICU and other workload metrics in the pediatric ICU (PICU).MethodsThis study was a retrospective cohort of pediatric ICU patients admitted to a single institution -between February 2, 2022 - August 2, 2022. Two scores were calculated, including the MRC-ICU and the pediatric Daily Monitoring System (pDMS). Data were extracted from the electronic health record. The primary outcome was the correlation of the MRC-ICU to mortality, as measured by Pearson -correlation -coefficient. Additionally, the correlation of MRC-ICU to number of orders was evaluated. Secondary -analyses explored the correlation of the MRC-ICU with pDMS and with hospital and ICU length of stay.ResultsA total of 2,232 patients were included comprising 2,405 encounters. The average age was 6.9 years (standard deviation [SD] 6.3 years). The average MRC-ICU score was 3.0 (SD 3.8). For the primary outcome, MRC-ICU was significantly positively correlated to mortality (0.22 95% confidence interval [CI 0.18 - 0.26]), p<0.05. Additionally, MRC-ICU was significantly positively correlated to ICU length of stay (0.38 [CI 0.34 - 0.41]), p<0.05. The correlation between the MRC-ICU and pDMS was (0.72 [CI 0.70 - 0.73]), p<0.05.ConclusionIn this pilot study, MRC-ICU demonstrated an association with existing prioritization metrics and with mortality and length of ICU stay in PICU population. Further, larger scale studies are required.
| S-EPMC10715388 | biostudies-literature