Dataset Information

Change in individual chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test item scores after short-term bronchodilator therapy and its impact on exacerbation in treatment-naive patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) measures the health status of patients with COPD. We aimed to investigate the change in individual CAT scores after short-term bronchodilator therapy among treatment-naïve patients with COPD.

Methods

Data from 148 patients newly diagnosed with COPD between January 2016 and April 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. We compared the CAT score, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea grade, and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) before and after short-term (6 ± 2 months) bronchodilator therapy. We analyzed the change trends using generalized estimating equations.

Results

The mean patient age was 70.9 years, and 92.6% were male. The total CAT score did not significantly improve. However, among the CAT items, phlegm [adjusted difference: -0.22 (-0.48, -0.002)], chest tightness [-0.30 (-0.56, -0.05)], and breathlessness [-0.45 (-0.66, -0.23)] scores significantly improved after bronchodilator therapy. The patients were divided into two groups: CAT score improved (n = 69) and not improved group (n = 79). The development of moderate-to-severe exacerbations during follow-up was significantly lower (2.9% versus 17.7%, p = 0.004) in the CAT score improved group.

Conclusion

The improvement in CAT items indicating respiratory symptoms was more evident than the CAT total score after short-term bronchodilator therapy. Despite the significant increase in FEV₁ after bronchodilator therapy, fewer than half of the patients achieved meaningful improvement in CAT, and this group showed significantly lower development of exacerbation during follow-up.

SUBMITTER: Kim BG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9340891 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Change in individual chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test item scores after short-term bronchodilator therapy and its impact on exacerbation in treatment-naïve patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Kim Bo-Guen BG Shin Sun Hye SH Gil Hyun-Il HI Zo Sungmin S Im Yunjoo Y Song Ju Yeun JY Lee Chai Young CY Kang Danbee D Cho Juhee J Park Hye Yun HY

Therapeutic advances in chronic disease 20220730

<h4>Background</h4>The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) measures the health status of patients with COPD. We aimed to investigate the change in individual CAT scores after short-term bronchodilator therapy among treatment-naïve patients with COPD.<h4>Methods</h4>Data from 148 patients newly diagnosed with COPD between January 2016 and April 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. We compared the CAT score, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea grade, and ...[more]

PMID: 35924010

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can experience 'exacerbations' of their conditions. An exacerbation is an event defined in terms of subjective descriptors or symptoms, namely dyspnoea, cough and sputum that worsen sufficiently to warrant a change in medical management. There is a need for reliable markers that reflect the pathological mechanisms that underlie exacerbation severity and that can be used as a surrogate to assess treatment effects in clinical studies. Little is known as to how existing study variables and suggested markers change in both the stable and exacerbation phases of COPD. In an attempt to find the best surrogates for exacerbations, we have reviewed the literature to identify which of these markers change in a consistent manner with the severity of the exacerbation event. METHODS: We have searched standard databases between 1966 to July 2004 using major keywords and terms. Studies that provided demographics, spirometry, potential markers, and clear eligibility criteria were included in this study. Central tendencies and dispersions for all the variables and markers reported and collected by us were first tabulated according to sample size and ATS/ERS 2004 Exacerbation Severity Levels I to III criteria. Due to the possible similarity of patients in Levels II and III, the data was also redefined into categories of exacerbations, namely out-patient (Level I) and in-patient (Levels II & III combined). For both approaches, we performed a fixed effect meta-analysis on each of the reported variables. RESULTS: We included a total of 268 studies reported between 1979 to July 2004. These studies investigated 142,407 patients with COPD. Arterial carbon dioxide tension and breathing rate were statistically different between all levels of exacerbation severity and between in out- and in-patient settings. Most other measures showed weak relationships with either level or setting, or they had insufficient data to permit meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Arterial carbon dioxide and breathing rate varied in a consistent manner with exacerbation severity and patient setting. Many other measures showed weak correlations that should be further explored in future longitudinal studies or assessed using suggested mathematical modelling techniques.