Dataset Information

Transfusion support for a woman with RHD09.01.02* and the novel RHD01W.161* allele in trans.

ABSTRACT: According to recent work group recommendations, individuals with the serologic weak D phenotypes should be RHD genotyped and individuals with molecular weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, or 4.1 should be treated as D+. We report an African American woman with a long-standing history of metrorrhagia, who presented for infertility evaluation. Blood grouping showed AB with a possible subgroup of A, based on mixed-field agglutination, and a serologic weak D phenotype. Results from routine red cell genotyping for the RHD gene was incongruent with the serologic RhCE phenotype. For the surgical procedure, the patient was hence scheduled to receive group AB, D- RBC transfusions. Subsequent molecular analysis identified the ABO*A2.01 and ABO*B.01 alleles for the ABO genotype and the novel RHD allele [NG_007494.1(RHD):c.611T>A] along with an RHD*09.01.02 allele for the RHD genotype. Using a panel of monoclonal anti-D reagents, we showed the novel RHD(I204K) allele to represent a serologic weak D phenotype, despite occurring as a compound heterozygote, designated RHD*weak D type 161 (RHD*01W.161). Individuals with a weak D type 4.2 allele are prone to anti-D immunization, while the immunization potential of novel RHD alleles is difficult to predict. For now, patients should be treated as D- in transfusion and pregnancy management, when they harbor a novel RHD allele along with any weak D allele other than weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, or 4.1. This study exemplifies strategies for how and when a laboratory should proceed from routine genotyping to nucleotide sequencing before any decisions on transfusion practice is made.

SUBMITTER: Srivastava K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9364384 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Transfusion support for a woman with RHD09.01.02 and the novel RHD01W.161 allele in trans.

Srivastava K K Bueno M U MU Flegel W A WA

Immunohematology 20220429 1

According to recent work group recommendations, individuals with the serologic weak D phenotypes should be RHD genotyped and individuals with molecular weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, or 4.1 should be treated as D+. We report an African American woman with a long-standing history of metrorrhagia, who presented for infertility evaluation. Blood grouping showed AB with a possible subgroup of A, based on mixed-field agglutination, and a serologic weak D phenotype. Results from routine red cell ge ...[more]

PMID: 35852060

Similar Datasets

Project description:D- red blood cells (RBCs), always in short supply, and Rh immune globulin (RhIG) are not needed for patient care if D+ RBCs can safely be transfused. According to a recent work group recommendation, patients with the RHD*weak D type 4.0 allele can be considered D+. We report an African American woman who presented for delivery at the end of the third trimester, at which time anti-U and a serologic weak D phenotype were recognized, requiring U-, D- RBC units. We obtained 3 U- RBC units, including 1 D- unit. Later, the RHD*weak D type 4.0 allele was determined by RHD genotyping, only 6 days before delivery. The patient had an uneventful vaginal delivery of a D+ baby. No transfusion was needed for mother or baby. In this case, a pregnant woman with the RHD*weak D type 4.0 allele can safely be managed as D+, relaxing the unnecessary D- restriction for the limited U- RBC supply. The procured U-, D- RBC unit was frozen with 14 days of shelf-life remaining. To conserve D- RBC units, not limited to U-, for patients with a definite need, we recommend molecular analysis of a serologic weak D phenotype before a transfusion becomes imminent. The best time to resolve a serologic weak D phenotype with RHD genotyping is early in a pregnancy. Immunohematology 2021;37:1-4 .D– red blood cells (RBCs), always in short supply, and Rh immune globulin (RhIG) are not needed for patient care if D+ RBCs can safely be transfused. According to a recent work group recommendation, patients with the RHD*weak D type 4.0 allele can be considered D+. We report an African American woman who presented for delivery at the end of the third trimester, at which time anti-U and a serologic weak D phenotype were recognized, requiring U–, D– RBC units. We obtained 3 U– RBC units, including 1 D– unit. Later, the RHD*weak D type 4.0 allele was determined by RHD genotyping, only 6 days before delivery. The patient had an uneventful vaginal delivery of a D+ baby. No transfusion was needed for mother or baby. In this case, a pregnant woman with the RHD*weak D type 4.0 allele can safely be managed as D+, relaxing the unnecessary D– restriction for the limited U– RBC supply. The procured U–, D– RBC unit was frozen with 14 days of shelf-life remaining. To conserve D– RBC units, not limited to U–, for patients with a definite need, we recommend molecular analysis of a serologic weak D phenotype before a transfusion becomes imminent. The best time to resolve a serologic weak D phenotype with RHD genotyping is early in a pregnancy. Immunohematology 2021;37:1–4 .

Dataset Information

Transfusion support for a woman with RHD09.01.02* and the novel RHD01W.161* allele in trans.

Publications

Transfusion support for a woman with <i>RHD09.01.02</i> and the novel <i>RHD01W.161</i> allele <i>in trans</i>.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Dataset Information

Transfusion support for a woman with RHD*09.01.02 and the novel RHD*01W.161 allele in trans.

Publications

Transfusion support for a woman with <i>RHD*09.01.02</i> and the novel <i>RHD*01W.161</i> allele <i>in trans</i>.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Transfusion support for a woman with RHD09.01.02* and the novel RHD01W.161* allele in trans.

Transfusion support for a woman with <i>RHD09.01.02</i> and the novel <i>RHD01W.161</i> allele <i>in trans</i>.