Dataset Information

Effectiveness of mindful walking intervention in nature on sleep quality and mood among university student during Covid-19: A randomised control study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

The aim of this project was to conduct a randomised control study to examine whether outdoor mindful walking in nature can effectively improve university students' sleep quality, mood, and mindfulness during the lockdown of Covid-19 pandemic in the U.K.

Methods

Participants were measured at T₀ (pre-study baseline), T₁ (pre-intervention), T₂ (post-intervention), and T₃ (follow-up). A total of 104 participants (female = 94) who were experiencing sleep difficulties were randomly allocated to either an experimental (i.e., nature) or control (i.e., urban) walking environments. Participants in each walking condition independently undertook a daily 35-minute walk for a week (7 days). Subjective sleep quality, total mood disturbance, mindfulness, and degree of nature, and participants' perspectives and suggestions about the intervention, were collected.

Results

Findings suggest that both groups exhibited significant improvements on participant's trait mindfulness, sleep quality and mood after the intervention. However, mindful walking in nature did not bring additional mental health benefits to participants than those who walked in urban environment. Participants reflected their perspectives about the intervention, which will assist with further intervention development.

Conclusions

Findings contribute to the evidence base for the effectiveness of outdoor mindful walking interventions on mental health. Especially these findings add new knowledge of how mindful walking outdoors reduces university students' mood disturbances and improves their sleep quality and mindfulness level during the pandemic.

SUBMITTER: Ma J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9365743 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effectiveness of a mindful nature walking intervention on sleep quality and mood in university students during Covid-19: A randomised control study.

Ma Jingni J Williams Joanne M JM Morris Paul Graham PG Chan Stella W Y SWY

Explore (New York, N.Y.) 20220811 3

<h4>Objective</h4>The aim of this project was to conduct a randomised control study to examine whether outdoor mindful walking in nature can effectively improve university students' sleep quality, mood, and mindfulness during the Covid-19 pandemic in the U.K.<h4>Methods</h4>Participants were measured at T<sub>0</sub> (pre-study baseline), T<sub>1</sub> (pre-intervention), T<sub>2</sub> (post-intervention), and T<sub>3</sub> (follow-up). A total of 104 participants (female = 94) who were experien ...[more]

PMID: 35973933

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe rising number of young people going to university has led to concerns about an increasing demand for student mental health services. We aimed to assess whether provision of mindfulness courses to university students would improve their resilience to stress.MethodsWe did this pragmatic randomised controlled trial at the University of Cambridge, UK. Students aged 18 years or older with no severe mental illness or crisis (self-assessed) were randomly assigned (1:1), via remote survey software using computer-generated random numbers, to receive either an 8 week mindfulness course adapted for university students (Mindfulness Skills for Students [MSS]) plus mental health support as usual, or mental health support as usual alone. Participants and the study management team were aware of group allocation, but allocation was concealed from the researchers, outcome assessors, and study statistician. The primary outcome was self-reported psychological distress during the examination period, as measured with the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), with higher scores indicating more distress. The primary analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12615001160527.FindingsBetween Sept 28, 2015, and Jan 15, 2016, we randomly assigned 616 students to the MSS group (n=309) or the support as usual group (n=307). 453 (74%) participants completed the CORE-OM during the examination period and 182 (59%) MSS participants completed at least half of the course. MSS reduced distress scores during the examination period compared with support as usual, with mean CORE-OM scores of 0·87 (SD 0·50) in 237 MSS participants versus 1·11 (0·57) in 216 support as usual participants (adjusted mean difference -0·14, 95% CI -0·22 to -0·06; p=0·001), showing a moderate effect size (β -0·44, 95% CI -0·60 to -0·29; p<0·0001). 123 (57%) of 214 participants in the support as usual group had distress scores above an accepted clinical threshold compared with 88 (37%) of 235 participants in the MSS group. On average, six students (95% CI four to ten) needed to be offered the MSS course to prevent one from experiencing clinical levels of distress. No participants had adverse reactions related to self-harm, suicidality, or harm to others.InterpretationOur findings show that provision of mindfulness training could be an effective component of a wider student mental health strategy. Further comparative effectiveness research with inclusion of controls for non-specific effects is needed to define a range of additional, effective interventions to increase resilience to stress in university students.FundingUniversity of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East of England.

Project description:BackgroundMost adolescent girls fail to meet current physical activity guidelines. Physical activity behaviours track from childhood into adulthood and providing adolescent girls with opportunities to be physically active may have health benefits beyond childhood. The effects of walking interventions on adult cardiometabolic health are known, however less is understood about the potential of walking to promote physical activity in adolescents. Following the Walking In ScHools (WISH) feasibility study, this definitive trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel, low-cost, school-based walking intervention at increasing physical activity levels of adolescent girls (aged 12-14 years).MethodsFemale pupils were recruited from eighteen schools across the border region of Ireland and in Northern Ireland. In intervention schools (n = 9), girls aged 15-18 years, were trained as walk leaders, and led the younger pupils in 10-15 min walks before school, at break and lunch recess. All walks took place in school grounds and pupils were encouraged to participate in as many walks as possible each week. The primary outcome measure was accelerometer determined total physical activity (counts per minutes, cpm).ResultsIn total, 589 pupils were recruited to the study. At baseline, pupils engaged in a median (interquartile range (IQR)) 35.7 (21.2) mins moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per day and only 12% (n = 66) of participants met physical activity guidelines (60 min MVPA per day). The intervention was delivered for a mean (standard deviation (SD)) 19.9 ± 0.97 weeks. The mean post-intervention total physical activity for the intervention group was 676 cpm and 710 cpm in the control group. Post-intervention total physical activity did not statistically differ between groups when adjusted for age, body mass index z-scores and baseline physical activity (mean difference, -33.5, 95% CI = -21.2 to 88.1; p = 0.213).Conclusions'Scaling-up' physical activity interventions is challenging and despite a promising feasibility study, the results of this fully powered trial suggest that in this context, the WISH intervention did not increase device measured physical activity. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, school environments have changed and although pupils enjoyed the programme, attendance at walks was low, indicating that there is a need to better understand how to implement interventions within schools.Trial registrationISRCTN; ISRCTN12847782; Registered 2nd July 2019.

Project description:ObjectivesWhen experiencing negative mood, people often eat to improve their mood. A learned association between mood and eating may cultivate frequent food cravings, detracting from health goals. Training in mindful eating may target this cycle of emotion-craving-eating by teaching individuals to manage urges when experiencing negative mood. We examined the impact of a mobile mindful eating intervention on the link between negative mood and food cravings among overweight women.MethodsIn a single-arm trial, participants (n = 64, M age = 46.1 years, M BMI = 31.5 kg/m2) completed ecological momentary assessments of negative mood and food cravings 3 times/day for 3 days pre- and post-intervention, as well as 1-month post-intervention. Using multilevel linear regression, we compared associations between negative mood and food craving strength at pre- vs. post-intervention (model 1) and post-intervention vs. 1-month follow-up (model 2).ResultsIn model 1, negative mood interacted with time point (β = - .20, SE = .09, p = .02, 95% CI [- .38, - .03]) to predict craving strength, indicating that the within-person association between negative mood and craving strength was significantly weaker at post-intervention (β = 0.18) relative to pre-intervention (β = 0.38). In model 2, negative mood did not interact with time point to predict craving strength (β = .13, SE = .09, p = .10, 95% CI - .03, .31]); the association did not significantly differ between post-intervention and 1-month follow-up.ConclusionsTraining in mindful eating weakened the mood-craving association from pre- to post-intervention. The weakened association remained at follow-up. Our findings highlight the mood-craving link as a target-worthy mechanism of mindful eating that should be assessed in clinical trials.Trial registrationNCT02694731.Supplementary informationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12671-021-01760-z.

Project description:BackgroundGiven the deleterious effects of physical inactivity in persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and/or heart failure (HF), interventions that promote long-term daily physical activity are needed. Mindful Steps, designed to promote walking behaviors in COPD and HF, is a multicomponent intervention that integrates mind-body content with other self-regulatory components. The aim of the current qualitative study was to characterize participants' experiences with Mindful Steps and understand the perceived influence of the intervention on walking and health.MethodIn the context of a pilot randomized controlled feasibility trial comparing the year-long Mindful Steps program to usual care among individuals with COPD and HF, semi-structured qualitative interviews were administered at 6- and 12-months. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. The constant comparative method was used to code transcripts, identify categories, and develop interrelated themes.ResultsNineteen participants (63% female; Mage = 70.2 years, SD = 6.95) who were randomized to the intervention group completed the 6-month interview and 17 completed the 12-month interview. The pedometer with feedback, live group classes, and mind-body videos were described as the most helpful intervention components. Participants learned several strategies that helped their walking (e.g., breathing regulation and awareness, body awareness, mind-body techniques, pacing), described walking as enjoyable, and identified internal reasons for walking (e.g., to feel good). They also reported several physical and mental health benefits of the intervention. Some participants reported limited influence of the intervention on walking or health. Many participants continued to use the strategies they learned in the first half of the intervention at 12-months.ConclusionsThe mind-body content of Mindful Steps appeared to positively influence walking behaviors. Participants' experiences with the intervention helped to identify areas for future intervention refinement. Future quantitative work is needed to corroborate these qualitative findings and assess the efficacy of the intervention on long-term physical activity engagement.Trial registrationThis trial is registered in Clinical Trials.gov, ID number NCT01551953.

Project description:ObjectivesInterventions addressing the individual and environmental protective factors of adolescents are suggested to have potential for reducing adolescent substance use. While universally delivered school-based substance use prevention interventions are common, previous studies have suggested variable effectiveness by subgroups of students. An exploratory study was undertaken to examine the differential effectiveness of a universal school-based resilience intervention on adolescent substance use and protective factors according to their sociodemographic and previous substance use.DesignSecondary analysis of data from a cluster-randomised controlled trial.Setting32 Australian secondary schools.ParticipantsCohort of grade 7 students (n=3155) followed up in grade 10 (aged 15-16 years; 2014; n=2105).InterventionThree-year universal school-based intervention implemented by school staff that targeted a range of student resilience protective factors (2012-2014).MeasurementsPrimary outcomes included: tobacco (recent, number of cigarettes) and alcohol (recent, 'risk' and number of drinks) use, and secondary outcomes included: marijuana (recent) and other illicit substance (recent) use, and aggregate individual and environmental protective factor scores. Generalised and linear mixed models examined interactions between treatment and student subgroups (gender; socioeconomic disadvantage (low/high); geographic location (major city/inner regional/outer regional-remote); and previous substance use (non-user/user)) at follow-up (36 models).ResultsAnalysis of student follow-up data showed no differential intervention effect for any substance use or protective factor outcome for any subgroup, with the exception of one differential effect found by socioeconomic status for the outcome of mean number of cigarettes smoked by recent smokers (p=0.003). There was no evidence of an intervention effect within the low (mean difference (MD) -12.89, 95% CI -26.00 to 0.23) or high (MD 16.36, 95% CI -1.03 to 33.76) socioeconomic subgroups.ConclusionsNo evidence of an intervention effect on substance use and protective factors was found according to student subgroups defined by sociodemographic characteristics or previous substance use.Trial registration numberACTRN12611000606987.