Dataset Information

Comparison of global indicators for severe maternal morbidity among South Korean women who delivered from 2003 to 2018: a population-based retrospective cohort study

ABSTRACT:

Background

Even though several severe maternal morbidity (SMM) indicators exist globally, indicators that can serve as international standards are needed. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the SMM risk assessment using four international indicators and identify the factors underlying the differences among the risk assessments obtained by the various indicators.

Methods

This study used the National Health Insurance delivery cohort in South Korea from 2003 to 2018. SMM was estimated using four indicators: the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US-CDC) SMM algorithm, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) gold standard guidelines, Zwart et al.’s indicators for the Netherlands, and the European Network on Severe Acute Maternal Morbidity (EURONET-SAMM) index. Generalized estimating equations models were used to identify the relationships between SMM indicators and risk factors.

Results

The SMM incidence rates in 6,421,091 deliveries, were 2.36%, 3.12%, 0.31%, and 1.36% using the US-CDC, ACOG, Zwart et al.’s, and EURONET SAMM indicators, respectively. In sub indicators, hemorrhage-related codes constituted the highest proportion of all SMM indicators. Advanced maternal age was related to high risk in all four SMM indicators (US-CDC: 40–44 years, RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.63–1.71; ACOG’s guidelines: 40–44 years, RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.49–1.56; Zwart’s indicators: RR 2.72, 95% CI 2.55–2.90; EURONET-SAMM: RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.97–2.11) compared to those aged 25–29 years. In residential area, women who lived in rural area had approximately 1.2- to 1.5-fold higher risk of SMM compared to those who lived in Seoul. Additionally, inadequate prenatal care was associated with a 1.1- to 1.4-fold higher risk of SMM compared to adequate prenatal care.

Conclusions

SMM was associated with maternal age, socioeconomic status, and adverse obstetric factors using various international SMM indicators. Further studies are needed to further determine risk and preventable factors for SMM and to identify more specific causes associated with the frequent sub-indicators of SMM.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-022-01482-y. Plain language summary There are several indicators of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) globally, but indicators that can serve as international standards are not exist yet. This study compared the SMM risk assessment using four international indicators such as US-CDC’s SMM, ACOG’s gold standard guidelines, Zwart et al.’s SMM, and EURONET-SAMM, and identify the factors underlying the differences among the risk assessments obtained by the various indicators. This study extracted women who were aged 15–49 years, those who had childbirth in the healthcare institute during 2003 to 2018 in South Korea using the National Health Insurance database. Of the 6,421,091 childbirth cases, the incidence of each SMM indicators were as follow: the US-CDC’s SMM: 2.4%; the ACOG’s gold standard guidelines: 3.1%; Zwart et al.’s SMM: 0.3%; the EURONET-SAMM: 1.4% indicators. In addition, the highest incidence of each sub-indicators was blood transfusion or obstetric hemorrhage which recorded more than 70% of total SMM cases. In particular, the risk factor on SMM were: advanced maternal age; living rural area; inadequate prenatal care. In conclusion, SMM was associated with maternal age, socioeconomic status, and adverse obstetric factors using various global SMM indicators. Therefore, further studies are needed to identify more specific causes associated with the frequent sub-indicators of SMM and to determine risk and preventable factors for SMM.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-022-01482-y.

SUBMITTER: Nam J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9375335 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceHistorically redlined neighborhoods may experience disinvestment, influencing their likelihood of gentrification, a process of neighborhood (re-)development that unequally distributes harms and benefits by race and class. Understanding the combined outcomes of redlining and gentrification informs how the mutually constitutive systems of structural racism and racial capitalism affect pregnancy outcomes.ObjectiveTo examine if historical redlining and contemporary gentrification is associated with increased severe maternal morbidity (SMM) odds.Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional study used data from a statewide population-based sample of all live hospital births at 20 weeks' gestation or more between 2005 and 2018 in California. Analysis was conducted from March 2023 to January 2024.ExposureRedlining (as characterized by the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation mortgage security maps) and displacement (using present-day sociodemographic and housing market information).Main outcomes and measuresMixed-effects logistic regression models were used to assess the association of census tract-level exposure to historical redlining and contemporary gentrification with increased SMM odds, adjusting for sociodemographic and pregnancy related factors. Outcome classification was based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention SMM index, which defines SMM as having any of the 21 procedures and diagnoses based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes.ResultsThe study sample included 1 554 837 births (median [SD] maternal age, 29.0 [6.4] years; 3464 American Indian or Alaskan Native [0.2%], 224 774 Asian [14.5%], 132 240 Black [8.5%], 880 104 Hispanic [56.6%], 312 490 White [20.1%]), with 22 993 cases of SMM (1.4%). Residents in historically redlined neighborhoods that were undergoing gentrification or displacement were more likely to be Black, Hispanic, and American Indian or Alaskan Native. Independent of individual-level characteristics, SMM odds were greater for individuals living in redlined neighborhoods that experienced displacement (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14-1.28) and in redlined neighborhoods undergoing gentrification (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.13-1.29) compared with those in continuously advantaged neighborhoods.Conclusions and relevanceFindings from this cross-sectional study demonstrate that the legacies of redlining, intertwined with current dynamics of displacement and gentrification, affect SMM. Place-based sociopolitical mechanisms that inequitably distribute resources may be important intervention points to address structural drivers of adverse pregnancy outcomes and their racial inequities.

Project description:There is international interest in monitoring severe events in the obstetrical population, commonly referred to as maternal near miss or severe maternal morbidity. These events can have significant consequences for individuals in this population and further study can inform practices to reduce both maternal morbidity and mortality. Numerous surveillance systems exist but we lack a standardized approach. Given the current inconsistencies and the importance in monitoring these events, this study aimed to identify and compare commonly used surveillance methods. In June 2018, we systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL using terms related to monitoring/surveillance and maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity. We included papers that used at least three indicators to monitor for these events and collected data on specific surveillance methods. We calculated the rate of maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity in hospitalization data obtained from the 2016 US National Inpatient Sample using five common surveillance methods. Of 18,832 abstracts, 178 papers were included in our review. 198 indicators were used in studies included in our review; 71.2% (n = 141) of these were used in <10% of included studies and only 6.1% (n = 12) were used in >50% of studies included in our review. Eclampsia was the only indicator that was assessed in >80% of included studies. The rate of these events in American hospitalization data varied depending on the criteria used, ranging from 5.07% (95% CI = 5.02, 5.11) with the Centers for Disease Control criteria and 7.85% (95% CI = 7.79, 7.91) using the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Our review highlights inconsistencies in monitoring practices within and between developed and developing countries. Given the wide variation in monitoring approaches observed and the likely contributing factors for these differences, it may be more feasible for clinical and academic efforts to focus on standardizing approaches in developed and developing countries independently at this time. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42018096858.

Project description:ImportancePregnancy outcomes are historically poor among people with sickle cell disease (SCD) in the US, most of whom have Black race. Whether outcomes have improved is unknown.ObjectiveTo tabulate adverse pregnancy outcomes among patients with SCD, comparing outcomes of deliveries among Black people with SCD with those of Black people without SCD and a control non-Black population, and to measure the association of racial disparities with adverse outcomes in SCD pregnancies.Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional study was a secondary analysis involving data from National Inpatient Sample, a nationally representative sample of 20% of acute hospital admissions in the US, between 2012 and 2018. The data set included all admissions with codes for delivery of a pregnancy among people aged 11 to 55 years. Data were analyzed from September 2021 to August 2022.ExposuresSCD, racial disparities.Main outcomes and measuresSevere maternal morbidity (SMM) as measured by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's index alongside other outcomes; multiple logistic regression was used to compare the odds for adverse pregnancy outcomes.ResultsThe sample included 5 401 899 deliveries, including 3901 deliveries among people with SCD and 742 164 deliveries among people with Black race. Compared with the non-Black control group, patients with SCD and Black patients were younger (mean [SD] age: SCD, 27.2 [5.9] years; Black, 27.1 [6.1] years vs 28.7 [5.9] years) and more likely to have public insurance (SCD, 2609 deliveries [67.3%]; Black, 496 828 deliveries [65.4%] vs 1 880 198 deliveries [40.8%]). The maternal mortality rate in deliveries among people with SCD was 26 times greater than in the non-Black control group and more than 10 times greater than among Black pregnant people without SCD (Per 10 000 deliveries: SCD 13.3; 95% CI, 5.7-31.2; Black race, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.5; non-Black control 0.5; 95% CI, 0.5-0.6). Compared with the control group, SCD deliveries had higher odds of SMM (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 7.22; 95% CI, 6.25-8.34; P < .001), especially cerebrovascular events (aOR, 22.00; 95% CI, 15.25-31.72; P < .001) and thromboembolism (aOR, 17.34; 95% CI, 11.55-26.03; P < .001). Racial disparities explained a median (IQR) 28.9% (21.2%-33.1%) of the increased risk in deliveries to people with SCD and between 40% and 50% of the increased risk for acute kidney failure (excess risk [ER], 56.9%; 95% CI, 54.3%-59.3%), intrauterine fetal demise (ER, 47.8%; 95% CI, 46.6%-49.1%), and eclampsia (ER, 42.1%; 95% CI, 37.9%-46.1%).Conclusions and relevanceIn this large cross-sectional study of pregnancy outcomes in people with SCD, the risk for SMM was higher compared with deliveries among people without SCD, especially for thrombotic events, organ failure, and death. Racial disparities were associated with adverse outcomes. Our findings compel scientific, clinical, and political effort to improve outcomes for pregnant people with SCD.

Project description:BackgroundThis study investigates the frequency of near-miss events and compares correlates in the world's newest nation.MethodsA cross-sectional study was carried out to audit near-miss events and their causes. A total of 1,041 mothers were sampled. Data were gathered using World Health Organization near-miss evaluation tools according to morbidity and organ failure-based criteria. Intensive care unit admission criteria were not used (as there is no functional intensive care unit in Juba Teaching Hospital). Descriptive statistics and bivariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to analyze the data. The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.ResultsNearly half (49.7%) of the clients were young pregnant women (aged 15-24 years), with a mean age of 25.07±5.65 years. During the study period, there were 994 deliveries, 94 near-misses, and 10 maternal deaths. This resulted in maternal near-miss and mortality rates of 94.1 per 1,000 and 1,007 per 100,000 live births, respectively. Severe maternal outcome and maternal near-miss rates were 10.47 per 1,000 (morbidity-based criteria) and 41.3 per 1,000 (organ failure-based criteria), respectively. The likelihood of mortality was 25% (95% CI 10%-51%) for a ruptured uterus, 9% (95% CI 4%-17%) for severe postpartum hemorrhage, and 11% (95% CI 3%-30%) for eclampsia. Anemia, hemorrhage, and dystocia were the highest contributory factors in the occurrence of maternal near-misses.ConclusionThe near-miss rate was high. Contributing factors were lack of resources, low quality of primary health care, and delays in care. All near-misses should be regarded as opportunities to improve the quality of maternity care. Health institutes should address delays in conducting interventions, referral barriers, and personnel gaps. Fully functional intensive-care units must be created in all facilities, including Juba Teaching Hospital and other hospitals. Notification policies for all near-miss cases should be in place in all health care units, with a "no shame, no blame" approach.

Project description:BackgroundSevere maternal morbidity has been increasing in the past few decades. Few studies have examined the risk of severe maternal morbidity among individuals with stillbirths vs individuals with live-birth deliveries.ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the prevalence and risk of severe maternal morbidity among individuals with stillbirths vs individuals with live-birth deliveries during delivery hospitalization as a primary outcome and during the postpartum period as a secondary outcome.Study designThis was a retrospective cohort study using birth and fetal death certificate data linked to hospital discharge records from California (2008-2018), Michigan (2008-2020), Missouri (2008-2014), Pennsylvania (2008-2014), and South Carolina (2008-2020). Relative risk regression analysis was used to examine the crude and adjusted relative risks of severe maternal morbidity along with 95% confidence intervals among individuals with stillbirths vs individuals with live-birth deliveries, adjusting for birth year, state of residence, maternal sociodemographic characteristics, and the obstetric comorbidity index.ResultsOf the 8,694,912 deliveries, 35,012 (0.40%) were stillbirths. Compared with individuals with live-birth deliveries, those with stillbirths were more likely to be non-Hispanic Black (10.8% vs 20.5%); have Medicaid (46.5% vs 52.0%); have pregnancy complications, including preexisting diabetes mellitus (1.1% vs 4.3%), preexisting hypertension (2.3% vs 6.2%), and preeclampsia (4.4% vs 8.4%); have multiple pregnancies (1.6% vs 6.2%); and reside in South Carolina (7.4% vs 11.6%). During delivery hospitalization, the prevalence rates of severe maternal morbidity were 791 cases per 10,000 deliveries for stillbirths and 154 cases per 10,000 deliveries for live-birth deliveries, whereas the prevalence rates for nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity were 502 cases per 10,000 deliveries for stillbirths and 68 cases per 10,000 deliveries for live-birth deliveries. The crude relative risk for severe maternal morbidity was 5.1 (95% confidence interval, 4.9-5.3), whereas the adjusted relative risk was 1.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.5-1.8). For nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity among stillbirths vs live-birth deliveries, the crude relative risk was 7.4 (95% confidence interval, 7.0-7.7), whereas the adjusted relative risk was 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.3). This risk was not only elevated among individuals with stillbirth during the delivery hospitalization but also through 1 year after delivery (severe maternal morbidity adjusted relative risk, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.4; nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity adjusted relative risk, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.3).ConclusionStillbirth was found to be an important contributor to severe maternal morbidity.

Dataset Information

Comparison of global indicators for severe maternal morbidity among South Korean women who delivered from 2003 to 2018: a population-based retrospective cohort study

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets