Dataset Information

Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against hospitalization and death in Canada: A multiprovincial test-negative design study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

A major goal of COVID-19 vaccination is to prevent severe outcomes (hospitalizations and deaths). We estimated the effectiveness of mRNA and ChAdOx1 COVID-19 vaccines against severe outcomes in four Canadian provinces between December 2020 and September 2021.

Methods

We conducted this multiprovincial retrospective test-negative study among community-dwelling adults aged ≥18 years in Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia, and Manitoba using linked provincial databases and a common study protocol. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate province-specific vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 hospitalization and/or death. Estimates were pooled using random effects models.

Results

We included 2,508,296 tested subjects, with 31,776 COVID-19 hospitalizations and 5,842 deaths. Vaccine effectiveness was 83% after a first dose, and 98% after a second dose, against both hospitalization and death (separately). Against severe outcomes (hospitalization or death), effectiveness was 87% (95%CI: 71%-94%) ≥84 days after a first dose of mRNA vaccine, increasing to 98% (95%CI: 96%-99%) ≥112 days after a second dose. Vaccine effectiveness against severe outcomes for ChAdOx1 was 88% (95%CI: 75%-94%) ≥56 days after a first dose, increasing to 97% (95%CI: 91%-99%) ≥56 days after a second dose. Lower one-dose effectiveness was observed for adults aged ≥80 years and those with comorbidities, but effectiveness became comparable after a second dose. Two doses of vaccines provided very high protection for both homologous and heterologous schedules, and against Alpha, Gamma, and Delta variants.

Conclusions

Two doses of mRNA or ChAdOx1 vaccines provide excellent protection against severe outcomes of hospitalization and death.

SUBMITTER: Nasreen S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9384799 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccines Against Hospitalization and Death in Canada: A Multiprovincial, Test-Negative Design Study.

Nasreen Sharifa S Febriani Yossi Y Velásquez García Héctor Alexander HA Zhang Geng G Tadrous Mina M Buchan Sarah A SA Righolt Christiaan H CH Mahmud Salaheddin M SM Janjua Naveed Zafar NZ Krajden Mel M De Serres Gaston G Kwong Jeffrey C JC

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 20230201 4

<h4>Background</h4>A major goal of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is to prevent severe outcomes (hospitalizations and deaths). We estimated the effectiveness of messenger RNA (mRNA) and ChAdOx1 COVID-19 vaccines against severe outcomes in 4 Canadian provinces between December 2020 and September 2021.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted this multiprovincial, retrospective, test-negative study among community-dwelling adults aged ≥18 years in Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia, and Manitob ...[more]

PMID: 35974428

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo estimate the effectiveness of mRNA covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic infection and severe outcomes (hospital admission or death).DesignTest negative design study.SettingOntario, Canada between 14 December 2020 and 19 April 2021.Participants324 033 community dwelling people aged ≥16 years who had symptoms of covid-19 and were tested for SARS-CoV-2.InterventionsBNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine.Main outcome measuresLaboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and hospital admissions and deaths associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Multivariable logistic regression was adjusted for personal and clinical characteristics associated with SARS-CoV-2 and vaccine receipt to estimate vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infection and severe outcomes.ResultsOf 324 033 people with symptoms, 53 270 (16.4%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 and 21 272 (6.6%) received at least one dose of vaccine. Among participants who tested positive, 2479 (4.7%) were admitted to hospital or died. Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infection observed ≥14 days after one dose was 60% (95% confidence interval 57% to 64%), increasing from 48% (41% to 54%) at 14-20 days after one dose to 71% (63% to 78%) at 35-41 days. Vaccine effectiveness observed ≥7 days after two doses was 91% (89% to 93%). Vaccine effectiveness against hospital admission or death observed ≥14 days after one dose was 70% (60% to 77%), increasing from 62% (44% to 75%) at 14-20 days to 91% (73% to 97%) at ≥35 days, whereas vaccine effectiveness observed ≥7 days after two doses was 98% (88% to 100%). For adults aged ≥70 years, vaccine effectiveness estimates were observed to be lower for intervals shortly after one dose but were comparable to those for younger people for all intervals after 28 days. After two doses, high vaccine effectiveness was observed against variants with the E484K mutation.ConclusionsTwo doses of mRNA covid-19 vaccines were observed to be highly effective against symptomatic infection and severe outcomes. Vaccine effectiveness of one dose was observed to be lower, particularly for older adults shortly after the first dose.

Project description:ObjectivesTo estimate the marginal effectiveness of a fourth versus third dose and the vaccine effectiveness of mRNA covid-19 vaccines BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 against any infection, symptomatic infection, and severe outcomes (hospital admission or death) related to the omicron variant.DesignTest negative design.SettingLong term care facilities in Ontario, Canada, 30 December 2021 to 27 April 2022.ParticipantsAfter exclusions, 61 344 residents aged 60 years or older across 626 long term care facilities in Ontario, Canada who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 were included.Main outcome measuresLaboratory confirmed omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection (any and symptomatic) by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and hospital admission or death. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate marginal effectiveness (four versus three doses) and vaccine effectiveness (two, three, or four doses versus no doses) while adjusting for personal characteristics, comorbidities, week of test, and previous positive SARS-CoV-2 test result more than 90 days previously.Results13 654 residents who tested positive for omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection and 205 862 test negative controls were included. The marginal effectiveness of a fourth dose (95% of vaccine recipients received mRNA-1273 as the fourth dose) seven days or more after vaccination versus a third dose received 84 or more days previously was 19% (95% confidence interval 12% to 26%) against infection, 31% (20% to 41%) against symptomatic infection, and 40% (24% to 52%) against severe outcomes. Vaccine effectiveness in vaccine recipients (compared with unvaccinated) increased with each additional dose, and for a fourth dose was 49% (95% confidence interval 43% to 54%) against infection, 69% (61% to 76%) against symptomatic infection, and 86% (81% to 90%) against severe outcomes.ConclusionsThe findings suggest that compared with a third dose of mRNA covid-19 vaccine, a fourth dose improved protection against infection, symptomatic infection, and severe outcomes among long term care residents during an omicron dominant period. A fourth vaccine dose was associated with strong protection against severe outcomes in vaccinated residents compared with unvaccinated residents, although the duration of protection remains unknown.

Project description:BackgroundAnnual estimates of seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness can guide global risk communication and vaccination strategies to mitigate influenza-associated illness. We aimed to evaluate vaccine effectiveness in countries using the 2023 southern hemisphere influenza vaccine formulation.MethodsWe evaluated end-of-season influenza vaccine effectiveness across eight countries (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, New Zealand, Paraguay, Thailand, and Uruguay) that used the 2023 southern hemisphere vaccine formulation, with use of a test-negative design. All patients who attended participating hospitals with severe acute respiratory illness were tested by RT-PCR for influenza. We calculated country-specific, network-specific, and pooled vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation. For countries with sufficient data, we also calculated vaccine effectiveness against intensive care unit (ICU) admission by comparing the odds of vaccination among test-positive cases to that among test-negative controls. We evaluated vaccine effectiveness for groups prioritised for vaccination (young children aged 1-4 years, people aged 5-64 years with underlying health conditions, and older adults aged ≥65 years).FindingsFrom March 5 to Nov 27, 2023, 31 368 individuals were admitted to hospital with severe acute respiratory infection in the eight included countries. Of these, 12 609 individuals admitted to hospital (6452 [51·2%] female and 6157 [48·8%] male) who met inclusion criteria and had complete data were included in the analysis, including 4388 test-positive cases and 8221 test-negative controls. Pooled vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation with any influenza virus was 51·9% (95% CI 37·2-66·7), with substantial heterogeneity across countries (I2 74%). Vaccine effectiveness against ICU admission from any influenza virus was 67·7% (44·5-81·2) in Chile and 69·7% (45·3-83·3) in Australia. Vaccine effectiveness estimates against hospitalisation were highest for young children (70·9% [47·5-94·4]) and lowest for older adults (47·7% [24·9-70·5]).InterpretationAcross eight countries, 2023 southern hemisphere vaccines were effective in reducing hospitalisations from influenza illness. Use of common protocols can facilitate data pooling to provide a comprehensive evaluation of vaccine effectiveness across settings.FundingUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cooperative agreements to the Pan American Health Organization and the Thailand Ministry of Public Health; the Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care; and the New Zealand Ministry of Health.