Dataset Information

Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism: A Nationwide Comparative Cohort Study in France.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Data from clinical trials indicate that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are noninferior and safer than conventional therapy (low-molecular-weight heparin followed by a vitamin K antagonist [VKA]) for treating venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE). This study compared the effectiveness and safety of DOACs and conventional therapy in a real-world setting.

Methods

This observational study used French national claims data of adult, treatment-naïve patients diagnosed with VTE (majority PE) who were hospitalized and treated for VTE with a DOAC (apixaban or rivaroxaban) or VKAs during 2013 to 2018. Patients with active cancer were excluded. After propensity score matching for each DOAC-VKA comparison, risks of bleeding, recurrent VTE, and all-cause mortality were compared at 6 months. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios of the endpoints.

Results

A total of 58,137 patients were included (10,775 VKAs, 10,440 apixaban, 36,922 rivaroxaban). Propensity score-matched cohort sizes were 7,503 for apixaban and 9,179 for rivaroxaban. The hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was significantly lower for apixaban than VKAs for bleeding requiring hospitalization (0.43 [0.32-0.59]), all-cause death (0.61 [0.51-0.74]), and first recurrent VTE (0.67 [0.52-0.85]). The hazard ratio was also significantly lower for rivaroxaban than VKAs for all-cause death (0.63 [0.53-0.74]) but not for bleeding requiring hospitalization (0.86 [0.69-1.07]) or first recurrent VTE (0.91 [0.74-1.13]).

Conclusion

Apixaban was associated with superior safety and effectiveness than VKAs. All-cause mortality was lower in both DOACs than VKAs. Our results support recommendations to use DOACs over VKAs for the treatment of VTE.

SUBMITTER: Bertoletti L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9393089 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism: A Nationwide Comparative Cohort Study in France.

Bertoletti Laurent L Gusto Gaelle G Khachatryan Artak A Quignot Nadia N Chaves Jose J Moniot Audrey A Mokgokong Ruth R

Thrombosis and haemostasis 20220104 8

<h4>Introduction</h4> Data from clinical trials indicate that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are noninferior and safer than conventional therapy (low-molecular-weight heparin followed by a vitamin K antagonist [VKA]) for treating venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE). This study compared the effectiveness and safety of DOACs and conventional therapy in a real-world setting.<h4>Methods</h4> This observational study used French national c ...[more]

PMID: 34983073

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a life-threatening complication occurring in cancer patients. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin are widely prescribed for treating cancer-associated VTE. However, data are sparse as to the effectiveness and bleeding complications associated with these medications in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to compare effectiveness and safety profiles between DOACs and warfarin in elderly cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.MethodsUsing the Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database, we retrospectively identified cancer patients aged ≥75 years who developed VTE during chemotherapy (n = 4,278, January 2016 to March 2020). Eligible patients were divided into those receiving warfarin (n = 557) and DOACs (n = 3,721). We conducted a 1:4 propensity score matching analysis to adjust for measured confounders. The primary outcome was VTE recurrence requiring hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding requiring hospitalization and inhospital death from all causes within 6 months.ResultsThe propensity-matched cohort included 557 patients in the warfarin group and 2,278 patients in the DOACs group. The proportion of VTE recurrence requiring hospitalization was lower in the DOACs group (5.3% vs. 7.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.98). The proportion of recurrent deep vein thrombosis was 6.3% and 4.4%, while that of recurrent pulmonary emboli was 1.3% and 1.3% in the warfarin and DOACs groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in the proportion of major bleeding events requiring hospitalization (1.6% vs. 1.1%; OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.62-3.50) or all-cause inhospital mortality (11.1% vs. 9.9%; OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.84-1.56) between the DOACs and warfarin groups.ConclusionOur findings suggest that DOACs may be more effective than warfarin in terms of VTE recurrence requiring hospitalization and that these medications may be equivalent in terms of safety.

Dataset Information

Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism: A Nationwide Comparative Cohort Study in France.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism: A Nationwide Comparative Cohort Study in France.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets