Dataset Information

Endoscopic submucosal dissection with ductotomy for the resection of a gastric duplication cyst with a communicating duct.

ABSTRACT: Video 1The endoscopic submucosal dissection of the gastric duplication cyst with ductotomy of an incidental communicating duct.

SUBMITTER: Simsek C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9414580 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Endoscopic submucosal dissection with ductotomy for the resection of a gastric duplication cyst with a communicating duct.

Simsek Cem C Ryou Marvin M Thompson Christopher C CC Aihara Hiroyuki H

VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 20220526 8

Video 1The endoscopic submucosal dissection of the gastric duplication cyst with ductotomy of an incidental communicating duct. ...[more]

PMID: 36034066

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesTo investigate the treatment effects of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for early gastric cancer (EGC).DesignMeta-analysis.MethodsWe systematically searched three electronic databases, including PubMed, EmBase and the Cochrane library for studies published with inception to January 2018. The eligible studies should be evaluated for the efficacy and safety of ESD versus EMR for patients with EGC. The summary ORs and standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs were employed as effect estimates. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of single study on overall analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed for investigated outcomes to evaluate the treatment effects of ESD versus EMR for patients with EGC with specific subsets.ResultsEighteen studies, with a total of 6723 patients with EGC, were included in final analysis. The summary ORs indicated that patients with EGC who received ESD were associated with an increased incidence of en bloc resection (OR: 9.00; 95% CI: 6.66 to 12.17; p<0.001), complete resection (OR: 8.43; 95% CI: 5.04 to 14.09; p<0.001) and curative resection (OR: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.85 to 4.61; p<0.001) when compared with EMR. Furthermore, ESD was associated with lower risk of local recurrence (OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.34; p<0.001). In addition, there was no significant difference between ESD and EMR for the risk of bleeding (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.80; p=0.203). Though, ESD was correlated with greater risk of perforation (OR: 2.55; 95% CI: 1.48 to 4.39; p=0.001), and longer operation time (SMD: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.13 to 2.10; p=0.026) as compared with EMR. Additionally, several different features observed in included studies and patients could bias the effectiveness of ESD versus EMR in patients with EGC.ConclusionsESD is superior than EMR for en bloc resection, complete resection, curative resection and local recurrence, while it increased perforation risk and longer operation time.

Dataset Information

Endoscopic submucosal dissection with ductotomy for the resection of a gastric duplication cyst with a communicating duct.

Publications

Endoscopic submucosal dissection with ductotomy for the resection of a gastric duplication cyst with a communicating duct.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets