Dataset Information

Tislelizumab Versus Chemotherapy as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (RATIONALE-302): A Randomized Phase III Study.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have poor prognosis. For these patients, treatment options are limited after first-line systemic therapy.

Patients and methods

In this open-label phase III clinical study, patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, whose tumor progressed after first-line systemic treatment, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous tislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, 200 mg every 3 weeks or chemotherapy (investigator's choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan). The primary end point was overall survival (OS) in all patients. The key secondary end point was OS in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 tumor area positivity (TAP) score ≥ 10%.

Results

In total, 512 patients across 11 countries/regions were randomly assigned. At final analysis, conducted after 410 death events occurred, OS was significantly longer with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy in all patients (median, 8.6 v 6.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.85]; one-sided P = .0001), and in patients with TAP ≥ 10% (median, 10.3 months v 6.8 months; HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.79]; one-sided P = .0006). Survival benefit was consistently observed across all predefined subgroups, including those defined by baseline TAP score, region, and race. Treatment with tislelizumab was associated with higher objective response rate (20.3% v 9.8%) and a more durable antitumor response (median, 7.1 months v 4.0 months) versus chemotherapy in all patients. Fewer patients experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (18.8% v 55.8%) with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Tislelizumab significantly improved OS compared with chemotherapy as second-line therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, with a tolerable safety profile. Patients with programmed death-ligand 1 TAP ≥ 10% also demonstrated statistically significant survival benefit with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy.

SUBMITTER: Shen L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9462531 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Tislelizumab Versus Chemotherapy as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (RATIONALE-302): A Randomized Phase III Study.

Shen Lin L Kato Ken K Kim Sung-Bae SB Ajani Jaffer A JA Zhao Kuaile K He Zhiyong Z Yu Xinmin X Shu Yongqian Y Luo Qi Q Wang Jufeng J Chen Zhendong Z Niu Zuoxing Z Zhang Longzhen L Yi Tienan T Sun Jong-Mu JM Chen Jianhua J Yu Guohua G Lin Chen-Yuan CY Hara Hiroki H Bi Qing Q Satoh Taroh T Pazo-Cid Roberto R Arkenau Hendrick-Tobias HT Borg Christophe C Lordick Florian F Li Liyun L Ding Ningning N Tao Aiyang A Shi Jingwen J Van Cutsem Eric E

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20220420 26

<h4>Purpose</h4>Patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have poor prognosis. For these patients, treatment options are limited after first-line systemic therapy.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>In this open-label phase III clinical study, patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, whose tumor progressed after first-line systemic treatment, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous tislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, 200 mg ...[more]

PMID: 35442766

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRATIONALE 302 (NCT03430843) an open-label, phase III study of second-line treatment of advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), reported that tislelizumab, relative to investigator-chosen chemotherapy (ICC), was associated with improvements in overall survival and a favorable safety profile. This study assessed the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and ESCC-related symptoms of patients in RATIONALE 302.MethodsAdults with advanced/metastatic ESCC whose disease progressed following prior systemic therapy were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either tislelizumab or ICC (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan). HRQoL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items (EORTC QLQ-C30), the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Oesophageal Cancer Module 18 items (QLQ-OES18), and the EuroQoL Five-Dimensions Five-Levels (EQ-5D-5L) visual analogue scale. Mixed effect modeling for repeated measurements examined changes from baseline to weeks 12 and 18. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to examine time to deterioration.ResultsOverall, 512 patients were randomized to tislelizumab (n = 256) or ICC (n = 256). The tislelizumab arm maintained QLQ-C30 global health status/quality whereas the ICC arm worsened at week 12 {difference in least square (LS) mean change: 5.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0-9.5], P = 0.0028} and week 18 [difference in LS mean change: 8.1 (95% CI: 3.4-12.8), P = 0.0008]. Physical functioning (week 18) and fatigue (weeks 12 and 18) worsened less in the tislelizumab compared with the ICC arm. The tislelizumab arm improved in reflux symptoms, whereas the ICC worsened at week 12 [difference in LS mean change: -4.1 (95% CI: -7.6 to -0.6), P = 0.0229]. The visual analogue scale remained consistent in the tislelizumab arm whereas it worsened in the ICC arm. The hazard of time to deterioration was lower in tislelizumab patients compared with ICC for physical functioning and reflux.ConclusionsHRQoL, including fatigue symptoms and physical functioning, was maintained in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC receiving tislelizumab compared with ICC-treated patients. These results provide additional support for the benefits of tislelizumab in this patient population.

Project description:BackgroundThe phase III RATIONALE-302 study evaluated tislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, as second-line (2L) treatment for advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This prespecified exploratory analysis investigated outcomes in patients from Europe and North America (Europe/North America subgroup).Patients and methodsPatients with tumor progression during/after first-line systemic treatment were randomized 1 : 1 to open-label tislelizumab or investigator's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan).ResultsThe Europe/North America subgroup comprised 108 patients (tislelizumab: n = 55; chemotherapy: n = 53). Overall survival (OS) was prolonged with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy (median: 11.2 versus 6.3 months), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.87]; HR was similar irrespective of programmed death-ligand 1 score [≥10%: 0.47 (95% CI 0.18-1.21); <10%: 0.55 (95% CI 0.30-1.01)]. Median progression-free survival was 2.3 versus 2.7 months with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy [HR: 0.97 (95% CI 0.64-1.47)]. Overall response rate was greater with tislelizumab (20.0%) versus chemotherapy (11.3%), with more durable response (median duration of response: 5.1 versus 2.1 months). Tislelizumab had a favorable safety profile versus chemotherapy, with fewer patients experiencing ≥grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (13.0% versus 51.0%). Those on tislelizumab experienced less deterioration in health-related quality of life, physical functioning, and/or disease- and treatment-related symptoms (i.e. fatigue, pain, and eating problems) as compared to those on chemotherapy, per the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and QLQ-OES18 scores.ConclusionsAs a 2L therapy for advanced/metastatic ESCC, tislelizumab improved OS and had a favorable safety profile as compared to chemotherapy in European/North American ESCC patients in the randomized phase III RATIONALE-302 study.

Project description:Anti-programmed cell death 1 immuno-monotherapy has become the second-line standard treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after the failure of first-line chemotherapy. However, new biomarkers are still needed to identify patients at risk of tumor progression and to select patients with advanced ESCC who are likely to benefit from immunotherapy. A total of 12 patients with advanced ESCC treated with tislelizumab were prospectively enrolled and endoscopic biopsy samples were collected. Plasma was obtained prior to and after every 2-3 treatment cycles with tislelizumab and when disease progression occurred. Targeted sequencing of 425 genes from plasma cell-free DNA, DNA from leukocytes and fixed esophageal tumor biopsies was performed. The patients underwent imaging analyses every 6-8 weeks until disease progression. The association between status of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or changes in ctDNA following tislelizumab immunotherapy and response, tumor progression and survival was determined. All patients had evaluable next-generation sequencing results at the time of analysis. The results showed that patients with ESCC with liver metastasis had a significantly shorter median progression-free survival (mPFS: 1.4 vs. 11.7 months; P=0.037). TSC complex subunit 2 [11.7 months vs. not reached (NR); P=0.004] and zinc finger protein 217 (11.7 months vs. NR; P=0.022) gene mutations were the independent and negative prognostic factors for median overall survival (OS), respectively. Of note, ctDNA dynamic changes expressed as ∆ mutant molecules per milliliter of plasma (∆MMPM; MMPM detected at the first monitoring time-point after the first infusion of tislelizumab as baseline MMPM) predicted progression-free survival (PFS) and OS more accurately compared to the ctDNA change of an individual gene. ∆MMPM <20% was an independent predictor of PFS (2.8 vs. 14.6 months; P=0.029), although there was no significant difference for OS (16.7 vs. 17.6 months; P=0.830). In conclusion, changes in ctDNA levels were associated with anti-tumor effects, progression and disease-specific survival. ctDNA sequencing is promising for predicting response and progression after tislelizumab immunotherapy as second-line monotherapy for advanced ESCC [the present study was part of the RATIONALE-302 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT03430843; 29.01.2018)].

Dataset Information

Tislelizumab Versus Chemotherapy as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (RATIONALE-302): A Randomized Phase III Study.

Purpose

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Tislelizumab Versus Chemotherapy as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (RATIONALE-302): A Randomized Phase III Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets