Dataset Information

Does MIDAS reduction at 3 months predict the outcome of erenumab treatment? A real-world, open-label trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In Italy, monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway are subsidized for the preventive treatment of high frequency and chronic migraine (CM) in patients with a MIgraine Disability ASsessment (MIDAS) score ≥ 11. Eligibility to treatment continuation requires a ≥ 50% MIDAS score reduction at three months (T3). In this study, we evaluate whether a ≥ 50% MIDAS score reduction at T3 is a reliable predictor of response to one-year erenumab treatment.

Methods

In this prospective, open-label, real-world study, 77 CM patients were treated with erenumab 70-140 mg s.c. every 28 days for one year (T13). We collected the following variables: monthly migraine days (MMDs), monthly headache days (MHDs), days of acute medication intake, MIDAS, HIT-6, anxiety, depression, quality of life and allodynia. Response to erenumab was evaluated as: i) average reduction in MMDs during the 1-year treatment period; and ii) percentage of patients with ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs during the last 4 weeks after the 13^th injection (Responders^T13).

Results

Erenumab induced a sustained reduction in MMDs, MHDs and intake of acute medications across the 12-month treatment period, with 64.9% of patients qualifying as Responders^T13. At T3, 55.8% of patients reported a ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score (MIDAS^Res) and 55.4% of patients reported a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs (MMD^Res). MIDAS^Res and MMD^Res patients showed a more pronounced reduction in MMDs during the 1-year treatment as compared to NON-MIDAS^Res (MIDAS^Res: T0: 23.5 ± 4.9 vs. T13: 7.7 ± 6.2; NON- MIDAS^Res: T0: 21.6 ± 5.4 vs. T13: 11.3 ± 8.8, p = 0.045) and NON-MMD^Res (MMD^Res: T0: 23.0 ± 4.5 vs. T13: 6.6 ± 4.8; NON-MMD^Res: T0: 22.3 ± 6.0 vs. T13: 12.7 ± 9.2, p < 0.001) groups. The percentage of Responders^T13 did not differ between MIDAS^Res (74.4%) and NON-MIDAS^Res (52.9%) patients (p = 0.058), while the percentage of Responders^T13 was higher in the MMD^Res group (83.3%) when compared to NON-MMD^Res (42.9%) (p = 0.001). MMD^Res predicted the long-term outcome according to a multivariate analysis (Exp(B) = 7.128; p = 0.001), while MIDAS^Res did not. Treatment discontinuation based on MIDAS^Res would have early excluded 36.0% of Responders^T13. Discontinuation based on "either MIDAS^Res or MMD^Res" would have excluded a lower percentage (16%) of Responders^T13.

Conclusion

MIDAS^Res only partly reflects the 12-month outcome of erenumab treatment in CM, as it excludes more than one third of responders. A criterion based on the alternative consideration of ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score or MMDs in the first three months of treatment represents a more precise and inclusive option.

Trial registration

The trial was retrospectively registered at www.

Clinicaltrials

gov (NCT05442008). CGRP: Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide.

Midas

MIgraine Disability Assessment. MMDs: monthly migraine days. MIDAS^Res: Patients with a MIDAS score reduction of at least 50% at T3. MMD^Res: Patients with a MMDs reduction of at least 50% at T3. Responder^T13: Patients with a MMDs reduction from baseline of at least 50% in the last 4 weeks of observation period (after 13 erenumab administrations). T0: First erenumab administration. T3, T6, T9, T12: Follow-up visits at three, six, nine, and twelve months after first erenumab administration. T13: Last visit of the protocol.

SUBMITTER: De Icco R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9482180 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Does MIDAS reduction at 3 months predict the outcome of erenumab treatment? A real-world, open-label trial.

De Icco Roberto R Vaghi Gloria G Allena Marta M Ghiotto Natascia N Guaschino Elena E Martinelli Daniele D Ahmad Lara L Corrado Michele M Bighiani Federico F Tanganelli Federica F Bottiroli Sara S Cammarota Francescantonio F Sances Grazia G Tassorelli Cristina C

The journal of headache and pain 20220917 1

<h4>Background</h4>In Italy, monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway are subsidized for the preventive treatment of high frequency and chronic migraine (CM) in patients with a MIgraine Disability ASsessment (MIDAS) score ≥ 11. Eligibility to treatment continuation requires a ≥ 50% MIDAS score reduction at three months (T3). In this study, we evaluate whether a ≥ 50% MIDAS score reduction at T3 is a reliable predictor of response to one-year erenumab treatment.<h4>Methods</h4>In this pro ...[more]

PMID: 36115947

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMonoclonal antibodies (mABs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway represent the first disease-specific preventive migraine therapy. Growing evidence suggests that they are effective in the preventive treatment of difficult-to-treat patients. In this study, we evaluated the psychological predictors of the outcome of treatment with the anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody erenumab in patients with chronic migraine (CM).MethodsSeventy-five patients with CM who had already failed at least 3 preventive therapies received erenumab every 28 days for a period of 12 months. Before the first administration, patients received a full psychological evaluation using The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV) to assess personality disturbances (primary outcome), mood and anxiety disorders, and as well specific questionnaires to evaluate alexithymia traits, childhood traumas, and current stressors (secondary outcomes).ResultsAfter 12 months of treatment, 53 patients reported a reduction of at least 50% in headache days/per month (Responders), whereas 22 did not (Non Responders). When compared to Responders, Non Responders were characterized by a higher prevalence of personality disorders belonging to Cluster C (avoidant, dependent, and obsessive-compulsive) (77% vs 37%, p = .001). Non Responders were also characterized by a higher prevalence of anxiety disorders (90% vs 60%, p = 0.007), showed more alexithymic traits (51.7 ± 13.7 vs 42.9 ± 14.3, p = 0.017), and reported a higher number of 'at least serious' current stressors (3.2 ± 4.0 vs 0.8 ± 1.4, p < .0001) than Responders. At the multivariate analysis, higher prevalence of Cluster C personality disorders (OR 3.697; p = 0.05) and higher number of 'at least serious' life events (OR 1.382; p = 0.017) arose as prognostic factors of erenumab failure.ConclusionsErenumab confirmed its effectiveness in a population of difficult-to-treat migraine. The presence of "anxious-fearful" personality together with current stressors and anxiety represent negative predictors of treatment outcome.Trial registrationThe study protocol was registered at clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT04361721 ).

Project description:ObjectivesTo assess real-world effectiveness, safety, and usage of erenumab in Canadian patients with episodic and chronic migraine with prior ineffective prophylactic treatments.BackgroundIn randomized controlled trials, erenumab demonstrated efficacy for migraine prevention in patients with ≤4 prior ineffective prophylactic migraine therapies. The "Migraine prevention with AimoviG: Informative Canadian real-world study" (MAGIC) assessed real-world effectiveness of erenumab in Canadian patients with migraine.MethodsMAGIC was a prospective open-label, observational study conducted in Canadian patients with chronic migraine (CM) and episodic migraine (EM) with two to six categories of prior ineffective prophylactic therapies. Participants were administered 70 mg or 140 mg erenumab monthly based on physician's assessment. Migraine attacks were self-assessed using an electronic diary and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects achieving ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) after the 3-month treatment period.ResultsAmong the 95 participants who mostly experienced two (54.7%) or three (32.6%) prior categories of ineffective prophylactic therapies and who initiated erenumab, treatment was generally safe and well tolerated; 89/95 (93.7%) participants initiated treatment with 140 mg erenumab. At week 12, 32/95 (33.7%) participants including 17/64 (26.6%) CM and 15/32 (48.4%) EM achieved ≥50% reduction in MMD while 30/86 (34.9%) participants including 19/55 (34.5%) CM and 11/31 (35.5%) EM achieved ≥50% reduction in MMD at week 24. Through patient-reported outcome questionnaires, 62/95 (65.3%) and 45/86 (52.3%) participants reported improvement of their condition at weeks 12 and 24, respectively. Physicians observed improvement in the condition of 78/95 (82.1%) and 67/86 (77.9%) participants at weeks 12 and 24, respectively.ConclusionOne-third of patients with EM and CM achieved ≥50% MMD reduction after 3 months of erenumab treatment. This study provides real-world evidence of erenumab effectiveness, safety, and usage for migraine prevention in adult Canadian patients with multiple prior ineffective prophylactic treatments.

Project description:BackgroundErenumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody and a highly potent, first-in-class calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor inhibitor approved for migraine prevention in adults. Randomised, placebo-controlled trials show that erenumab treatment results in clinically meaningful responses, including significant reductions in monthly migraine days. Real-world evidence of the effectiveness of erenumab in patients with migraine is accruing, but gaps remain, and findings may vary according to region. We evaluated the usage patterns and effectiveness of erenumab in real-world settings in patients with migraine in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).MethodsThis retrospective, observational real-world study enrolled patients ≥ 18 years with migraine who were prescribed erenumab in the UAE. Data were collected at baseline and Months 1, 3 and 6. The primary study objective was to characterise usage patterns of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine (CM) or episodic migraine (EM) in real-world settings in the UAE.ResultsOf the 166 patients, 124 (74.7%) were females. The mean (standard deviation) age at migraine onset was 29 (7.93) years. Seventy-one patients (42.8%) had CM and 95 (57.2%) had EM. In the overall population, the mean monthly headache/migraine days (MHD) at baseline was 15.7 (8.45) and mean change from baseline was - 8.2 (8.83) at Month 1, - 11.0 (9.15) at Month 3 and - 11.3 (8.90) at Month 6. The mean change from baseline in monthly acute migraine-specific medication days (MSMD) was - 9.0 (8.07) at Month 1, - 9.7 (8.73) at Month 3 and - 10.7 (8.95) at Month 6. At all time points, most patients achieved at least 50% reduction in MHD (80%-91%) and MSMD (84%-94%). Similar reductions in MHD and MSMD and clinical benefit in CM or EM were seen with erenumab monotherapy or erenumab add-on therapy, with or without dose escalation and for treatment naïve or ≥ 1 previous preventive treatment failures, with additional clinical benefit in the erenumab add-on therapy and dose escalation to 140 mg subgroups.ConclusionIn this real-world study on erenumab use in the UAE, patients prescribed erenumab achieved clinically meaningful reductions in MHD and MSMD at all assessed time points. Erenumab was well tolerated with no new safety events.

Project description:ObjectiveTo assess long-term (up to 2 years) efficacy, tolerability, and safety of erenumab for the prevention of episodic migraine (EM) in Japanese patients.BackgroundPreviously published results from the double-blind treatment phase (DBTP) of a phase 2 clinical study have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of erenumab in Japanese patients with EM.MethodsPatients completing the 24-week placebo-controlled DBTP could continue into the 76-week open-label treatment phase (OLTP), receiving erenumab 70 mg or 140 mg subcutaneously once monthly. The initial dose in the OLTP was erenumab 70 mg monthly, which was later changed to 140 mg. After study completion, the following were assessed: change from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMD), change from baseline in monthly acute migraine-specific medication days (MSMD), percentage of patients achieving ≥50% and ≥75% reduction in MMD, change from baseline in the 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6™) score, and safety (exposure-adjusted patient-incidence of adverse events [AEs], calculated as number of patients per 100 patient-years).ResultsOf 475 patients enrolled in the DBTP, 459 (96.6%) continued in the OLTP. The mean (SD) MMD was 7.9 (2.3) at baseline with the overall change from baseline at week 100 of -2.9 (4.1) days. The monthly acute MSMD was 5.7 (2.8) at baseline with change from baseline at week 100 of -1.7 (3.7) days. The proportion of patients who achieved ≥50% and ≥75% reduction in MMD from baseline at week 100 was 177/398 (44.5%) and 94/398 (23.6%), respectively. The HIT-6™ score was 58.4 (5.4) at baseline with a change of -6.4 (8.2) at week 100. The exposure-adjusted patient-incidence of AEs during the OLTP was 207.1/100 patient-years for the combined erenumab group, similar to that observed for either erenumab (271.0/100 patient-years) or placebo (257.3/100 patient-years) during the DBTP, and no new safety signals were detected during the OLTP.ConclusionLong-term erenumab treatment in Japanese patients with EM demonstrated sustained efficacy for up to 2 years, with a safety profile similar to previous studies, supporting erenumab as a potential new therapy for EM prevention in Japan.

Dataset Information

Does MIDAS reduction at 3 months predict the outcome of erenumab treatment? A real-world, open-label trial.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials

Midas

Publications

Does MIDAS reduction at 3 months predict the outcome of erenumab treatment? A real-world, open-label trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets