Dataset Information

BioTEA: Containerized Methods of Analysis for Microarray-Based Transcriptomics Data.

ABSTRACT: Tens of thousands of gene expression data sets describing a variety of model organisms in many different pathophysiological conditions are currently stored in publicly available databases such as the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and ArrayExpress (AE). As microarray technology is giving way to RNA-seq, it becomes strategic to develop high-level tools of analysis to preserve access to this huge amount of information through the most sophisticated methods of data preparation and processing developed over the years, while ensuring, at the same time, the reproducibility of the results. To meet this need, here we present bioTEA (biological Transcript Expression Analyzer), a novel software tool that combines ease of use with the versatility and power of an R/Bioconductor-based differential expression analysis, starting from raw data retrieval and preparation to gene annotation. BioTEA is an R-coded pipeline, wrapped in a Python-based command line interface and containerized with Docker technology. The user can choose among multiple options-including gene filtering, batch effect handling, sample pairing, statistical test type-to adapt the algorithm flow to the structure of the particular data set. All these options are saved in a single text file, which can be easily shared between different laboratories to deterministically reproduce the results. In addition, a detailed log file provides accurate information about each step of the analysis. Overall, these features make bioTEA an invaluable tool for both bioinformaticians and wet-lab biologists interested in transcriptomics. BioTEA is free and open-source.

SUBMITTER: Visentin L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9495986 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

BioTEA: Containerized Methods of Analysis for Microarray-Based Transcriptomics Data.

Visentin Luca L Scarpellino Giorgia G Chinigò Giorgia G Munaron Luca L Ruffinatti Federico Alessandro FA

Biology 20220913 9

Tens of thousands of gene expression data sets describing a variety of model organisms in many different pathophysiological conditions are currently stored in publicly available databases such as the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and ArrayExpress (AE). As microarray technology is giving way to RNA-seq, it becomes strategic to develop high-level tools of analysis to preserve access to this huge amount of information through the most sophisticated methods of data preparation and processing develop ...[more]

PMID: 36138825

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDNA methylation offers an excellent example for elucidating how epigenetic information affects gene expression. β values and M values are commonly used to quantify DNA methylation. Statistical methods applicable to DNA methylation data analysis span a number of approaches such as Wilcoxon rank sum test, t-test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, permutation test, empirical Bayes method, and bump hunting method. Nonetheless, selection of an optimal statistical method can be challenging when different methods generate inconsistent results from the same data set.ResultsWe compared six statistical approaches relevant to DNA methylation microarray analysis in terms of false discovery rate control, statistical power, and stability through simulation studies and real data examples. Observable differences were noticed between β values and M values only when methylation levels were correlated across CpG loci. For small sample size (n=3 or 6 in each group), both the empirical Bayes and bump hunting methods showed appropriate FDR control and the highest power when methylation levels across CpG loci were independent. Only the bump hunting method showed appropriate FDR control and the highest power when methylation levels across CpG sites were correlated. For medium (n=12 in each group) and large sample sizes (n=24 in each group), all methods compared had similar power, except for the permutation test whenever the proportion of differentially methylated loci was low. For all sample sizes, the bump hunting method had the lowest stability in terms of standard deviation of total discoveries whenever the proportion of differentially methylated loci was large. The apparent test power comparisons based on raw p-values from DNA methylation studies on ovarian cancer and rheumatoid arthritis provided results as consistent as those obtained in the simulation studies. Overall, these results provide guidance for optimal statistical methods selection under different scenarios.ConclusionsFor DNA methylation studies with small sample size, the bump hunting method and the empirical Bayes method are recommended when DNA methylation levels across CpG loci are independent, while only the bump hunting method is recommended when DNA methylation levels are correlated across CpG loci. All methods are acceptable for medium or large sample sizes.

Dataset Information

BioTEA: Containerized Methods of Analysis for Microarray-Based Transcriptomics Data.

Publications

BioTEA: Containerized Methods of Analysis for Microarray-Based Transcriptomics Data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets