Dataset Information

A pipeline for automated deep learning liver segmentation (PADLLS) from contrast enhanced CT exams.

ABSTRACT: Multiple studies have created state-of-the-art liver segmentation models using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs) such as the V-net and H-DenseUnet. Oversegmentation however continues to be a problem. We set forth to address these limitations by developing a an automated workflow that leverages the strengths of different DCNN architectures, resulting in a pipeline that enables fully automated liver segmentation. A Pipeline for Automated Deep Learning Liver Segmentation (PADLLS) was developed and implemented that cascades multiple DCNNs that were trained on more than 200 CT scans. First, a V-net is used to create a rough liver, spleen, and stomach mask. After stomach and spleen pixels are removed using their respective masks and ascites is removed using a morphological algorithm, the scan is passed to a H-DenseUnet to yield the final segmentation. The segmentation accuracy of the pipleline was compared to the H-DenseUnet and the V-net using the SLIVER07 and 3DIRCADb datasets as benchmarks. The PADLLS Dice score for the SLIVER07 dataset was calculated to be 0.957 ± 0.033 and was significantly better than the H-DenseUnet's score of 0.927 ± 0.044 (p = 0.0219) and the V-net's score of 0.872 ± 0.121 (p = 0.0067). The PADLLS Dice score for the 3DIRCADb dataset was 0.965 ± 0.016 and was significantly better than the H-DenseUnet's score of 0.930 ± 0.041 (p = 0.0014) the V-net's score of 0.874 ± 0.060 (p < 0.001). In conclusion, our pipeline (PADLLS) outperforms existing liver segmentation models, serves as a valuable tool for image-based analysis, and is freely available for download and use.

SUBMITTER: Senthilvelan J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9500060 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A pipeline for automated deep learning liver segmentation (PADLLS) from contrast enhanced CT exams.

Senthilvelan Jayasuriya J Jamshidi Neema N

Scientific reports 20220922 1

Multiple studies have created state-of-the-art liver segmentation models using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs) such as the V-net and H-DenseUnet. Oversegmentation however continues to be a problem. We set forth to address these limitations by developing a an automated workflow that leverages the strengths of different DCNN architectures, resulting in a pipeline that enables fully automated liver segmentation. A Pipeline for Automated Deep Learning Liver Segmentation (PADLLS) was devel ...[more]

PMID: 36138084

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the performance, agreement, and efficiency of a fully convolutional network (FCN) for liver lesion detection and segmentation at CT examinations in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLMs).Materials and methodsThis retrospective study evaluated an automated method using an FCN that was trained, validated, and tested with 115, 15, and 26 contrast material-enhanced CT examinations containing 261, 22, and 105 lesions, respectively. Manual detection and segmentation by a radiologist was the reference standard. Performance of fully automated and user-corrected segmentations was compared with that of manual segmentations. The interuser agreement and interaction time of manual and user-corrected segmentations were assessed. Analyses included sensitivity and positive predictive value of detection, segmentation accuracy, Cohen κ, Bland-Altman analyses, and analysis of variance.ResultsIn the test cohort, for lesion size smaller than 10 mm (n = 30), 10-20 mm (n = 35), and larger than 20 mm (n = 40), the detection sensitivity of the automated method was 10%, 71%, and 85%; positive predictive value was 25%, 83%, and 94%; Dice similarity coefficient was 0.14, 0.53, and 0.68; maximum symmetric surface distance was 5.2, 6.0, and 10.4 mm; and average symmetric surface distance was 2.7, 1.7, and 2.8 mm, respectively. For manual and user-corrected segmentation, κ values were 0.42 (95% confidence interval: 0.24, 0.63) and 0.52 (95% confidence interval: 0.36, 0.72); normalized interreader agreement for lesion volume was -0.10 ± 0.07 (95% confidence interval) and -0.10 ± 0.08; and mean interaction time was 7.7 minutes ± 2.4 (standard deviation) and 4.8 minutes ± 2.1 (P < .001), respectively.ConclusionAutomated detection and segmentation of CLM by using deep learning with convolutional neural networks, when manually corrected, improved efficiency but did not substantially change agreement on volumetric measurements.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article.

Dataset Information

A pipeline for automated deep learning liver segmentation (PADLLS) from contrast enhanced CT exams.

Publications

A pipeline for automated deep learning liver segmentation (PADLLS) from contrast enhanced CT exams.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets