Dataset Information

Real-world study of overall survival with palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitor in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

ABSTRACT: Data on real-world effectiveness of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor combination therapy versus endocrine therapy alone are limited. The Flatiron Health Analytic Database was used to assess overall survival (OS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with first-line palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) versus an AI alone in routine US clinical practice. In total, 2888 patients initiated treatment during February 3, 2015-March 31, 2020, with a potential ≥6-month follow-up (cutoff date, September 30, 2020). After stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting, median OS (95% CI) is significantly longer among palbociclib versus AI recipients (49.1 [45.2-57.7] versus 43.2 [37.6-48.0] months; hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.65-0.87]; P < 0.0001). Progression-free survival (95% CI) is 19.3 (17.5-20.7) versus 13.9 (12.5-15.2) months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.62-0.78]; P < 0.0001). These data support first-line palbociclib plus an AI treatment for HR+/HER2- MBC.(Trial number NCT05361655).

SUBMITTER: Rugo HS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9553912 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Real-world study of overall survival with palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitor in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

Rugo Hope S HS Brufsky Adam A Liu Xianchen X Li Benjamin B McRoy Lynn L Chen Connie C Layman Rachel M RM Cristofanilli Massimo M Torres Mylin A MA Curigliano Giuseppe G Finn Richard S RS DeMichele Angela A

NPJ breast cancer 20221011 1

Data on real-world effectiveness of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor combination therapy versus endocrine therapy alone are limited. The Flatiron Health Analytic Database was used to assess overall survival (OS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with first-line palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) versus an AI alone in routine US clinical practice. In total, 2888 patients in ...[more]

PMID: 36220852

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRandomized controlled trials have shown inconsistent overall survival (OS) benefit among the three cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) as first-line (1L) treatment of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Several real-world studies compared CDK4/6i effectiveness, with inconsistent findings. This study compared overall survival (OS) of patients with HR+/HER2- mBC receiving 1L palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib, in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI), in US clinical practice.Patients and methodsThis retrospective study used real-world data from the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived deidentified longitudinal database. Patients with HR+/HER2- mBC aged ≥18 years at mBC diagnosis started 1L CDK4/6i therapy (index treatment) between February 2015 and November 2023, with a potential ≥6-month follow-up. OS was defined as months from start of index treatment to death. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW; primary analysis) was used to balance baseline patient characteristics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was carried out as a sensitivity analysis.ResultsOf 9146 eligible patients, 6831, 1279, and 1036 received palbociclib plus AI, ribociclib plus AI, or abemaciclib plus AI, respectively. After sIPTW, baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment groups. After sIPTW, no significant OS differences were found between treatment groups [ribociclib versus palbociclib: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.10, P = 0.7531; abemaciclib versus palbociclib: aHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.08, P = 0.4292; abemaciclib versus ribociclib: aHR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.14, P = 0.6956]. Sensitivity analysis including a subanalysis of patients who started index treatment in 2017 or later also showed no significant OS differences between treatment groups.ConclusionsThis large real-world study suggested that there were no significant OS differences between 1L ribociclib, abemaciclib, and palbociclib in combination with an AI for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC. These findings together with other factors such as safety and quality of life are helpful in the selection of CDK4/6i combination therapy for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC.

Project description:BackgroundPalbociclib is the first cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor approved in China to be combined with endocrine therapy (ET) for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. However, palbociclib has only been used in China for a short amount of time, and there is limited data on its real-world applications. This study observed the efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus ET in a real-world setting in southwest China and we hope to provide some references for the treatment of patients with breast cancer in China.MethodsThis was an observational study of patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) who received palbociclib plus ET. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS) and the 6- and 12-month progression-free rates. The secondary endpoint included the objective response rate (ORR) and the clinical benefit rate (CBR).ResultsA total of 64 patients were enrolled in this study, and 54.7% of them received palbociclib plus ET as the first-line treatment for ABC. The median PFS was 21.6 months (95% CI: 11.2-32.0 months) after a median follow-up period of 13.8 months (95% CI: 11.9-15.7 months). The 6-month progression-free rate was 75.4%, and 48.9% of patients remained progression-free at 12 months. Overall, the ORR was 21.6% and the CBR was 76.5%. Patients with the molecular typing of Luminal A (P=0.035), a lower Ki67 level (P<0.001), sensitivity or acquired resistance to ET (P=0.003), less than 3 visceral metastases lesions (P=0.001), and those who received palbociclib plus ET as first-line or second-line of treatment for ABC (P=0.001) showed longer PFS. A total of 53.1% of patients had grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs), but only 4.7% of patients experienced permanent discontinuation of treatment due to intolerable AEs.ConclusionsThe efficacy of palbociclib plus ET is worthy of recognition and the toxicity was acceptable in this study, which is similar to previously reported data from randomized clinical trials and other real-world evidence. Treatment for ABC using palbociclib plus ET should be recommended more widely in China due to the efficacy and safety.

Project description:PurposeData on treatments for male breast cancer patients are limited owing to rarity and underrepresentation in clinical trials. The real-world POLARIS study gathers data on palbociclib use for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in female and male patients. This sub-analysis describes real-world palbociclib treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and quality of life (QoL) in male patients.MethodsPOLARIS is a prospective, noninterventional, multicenter, real-world study of patients with HR+/HER2- ABC receiving palbociclib. Assessments included medical record reviews, patient QoL questionnaires (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30), site characteristics questionnaires, and physician treatment selection surveys. Variables included demographics, disease history, global health status/QoL, clinical assessments and adverse events. Analyses were descriptive in nature. For clinical outcomes, real-world tumor responses and progression were determined by physician assessment in routine clinical practice. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was described using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsAt data cutoff, 15 male patients were enrolled (median age, 66 years). Nine patients received palbociclib as a first-line treatment and 6 as a second-line or later treatment. Patients received a median of 20 cycles of palbociclib. Neutropenia was experienced by 2 patients and grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 11 patients. Global health status/QoL scores remained generally consistent during the study. One patient (6.7%) achieved a complete tumor response, 4 (26.7%) a partial response, and 8 (53.3%) stable disease. Median rwPFS was 19.8 months (95% CI, 7.4-38.0). Median follow-up duration was 24.7 months (95% CI, 20.0-35.7).ConclusionThis real-world analysis showed that palbociclib was well tolerated and provides preliminary data on treatment patterns and outcomes with palbociclib in male patients with HR+/HER2- ABC, helping inform the use of palbociclib in this patient subgroup.Trial identifierNCT03280303.

Project description:BackgroundIn recent years, the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) has emerged as the standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. However, the comparison between the efficacy of CDK4/6i has been poorly explored before. Moreover, it remains unclear about the optimal choice of CDK4/6i in the first-line treatment for HR+/HER2- MBC patients in Asian, especially Chinese populations.ObjectivesOur study aims to compare the efficacy of three CDK4/6i widely used in the Chinese population (palbociclib, abemaciclib, and dalpiciclib) in the real world.DesignFrom 2020 to 2023, the medical records of patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- MBC were retrospectively assessed in seven institutions in China. Patients who received first-line palbociclib, abemaciclib, or dalpiciclib plus ET were included.MethodsDemographic and clinical data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate were used to analyze the clinical outcome.ResultsIn total, 209 HR+/HER2- MBC patients were eligible for this study. Eighty-eight (42.1%), 79 (37.8%), and 42 (20.1%) patients were administered first-line palbociclib, abemaciclib, or dalpiciclib plus ET. The overall median rwPFS was 19 months, with no significant difference between these three CDK4/6i (p = 0.84). The results were similar even after propensity score matching. The median OS was not reached. Cox univariate and multivariate regression analysis identified that higher KI67 index, liver metastasis, and primary endocrine resistance were independent risk factors for rwPFS in patients with initial CDK4/6i plus ET.ConclusionThis study presents a comparison of the real-world efficacy between three CDK4/6i widely used in the Chinese population. Palbociclib, abemaciclib, and dalpiciclib demonstrated comparable efficacy in Chinese patients with advanced HR+/HER2- MBC.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06344780.

Dataset Information

Real-world study of overall survival with palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitor in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

Publications

Real-world study of overall survival with palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitor in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets