Dataset Information

Prognostic influence of an early time to chemotherapy following primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

The current investigation analyzes the prognostic role of the time to chemotherapy (TTC) interval following primary cytoreductive surgery for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Methods

Characteristics and outcome data for 509 consecutive patients with stage IIIB-IVB ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer who had primary cytoreductive surgery between January 2000 and December 2019 are utilized. A univariate Cox regression determined the association of categorical variables with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Significant variables (p≤0.05) on univariate analysis were applied to Cox proportional hazard regression.

Results

The median TTC was 19 days and overall follow-up was 62.2 months. The PFS and OS were 25.5 months and 78.4 months for the study cohort plus 28.4 months and OS 84.5 months for patients rendered grossly disease-free. An early TTC (7-14 vs. 15-21 vs. 22-28 vs. >28 days) was associated with an improved PFS (41.7 vs. 30.6 vs. 18.9 vs. 17.9 months; p<0.001) and OS (132.7 vs. 104.6 vs. 56.5 vs. 48.0 months; p<0.001). The performance status, histology, disease distribution, dimension of residual disease, and categorical plus continuous TTC were predictors of PFS and OS. The use of maintenance therapy was also a predictor of PFS, and the route of chemotherapy administration was a predictor of OS.

Conclusions

For advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, a TTC of less than 21-days was observed to independently improve the PFS and OS. A 7-14 days TTC trended towards a further extension of the OS.

SUBMITTER: Eisenkop SM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9634102 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic influence of an early time to chemotherapy following primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Eisenkop Scott M SM Okabe Hidefusa H

Journal of gynecologic oncology 20220908 6

<h4>Objective</h4>The current investigation analyzes the prognostic role of the time to chemotherapy (TTC) interval following primary cytoreductive surgery for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.<h4>Methods</h4>Characteristics and outcome data for 509 consecutive patients with stage IIIB-IVB ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer who had primary cytoreductive surgery between January 2000 and December 2019 are utilized. A univariate Cox regression determined the association ...[more]

PMID: 36245229

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceUncertainty remains about the relative benefits of primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).ObjectiveTo compare overall survival of PCS vs NACT in a large national population of women with advanced-stage EOC.Design, setting, and participantsRetrospective cohort study of women with stage IIIC and IV EOC diagnosed between 2003 and 2011 treated at hospitals across the United States reporting to the National Cancer Data Base. We focused on patients 70 years or younger with a Charlson comorbidity index of 0 who were likely candidates for either treatment.ExposuresInitial treatment approach of PCS vs NACT, examined using an intent-to-treat analysis.Main outcomes and measuresOverall survival, defined as months from cancer diagnosis to death or date of the last contact. We used propensity score matching to compare similar women who underwent PCS and NACT. The association of treatment approach with overall survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. We assessed whether the findings were influenced by differences in the prevalence of an unobserved confounder, such as limited performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 1-2), preoperative disease burden, and BRCA status.ResultsAmong 22 962 patients (mean [SD] age, 56.12 [9.38] years), 19 836 (86.4%) received PCS and 3126 (13.6%) underwent NACT. We matched 2935 patients treated with NACT with similar patients who received PCS. The median follow-up was 56.5 (95% CI, 54.5-59.2) months in the PCS group and 56.3 (95% CI, 54.5-59.8) months in the NACT group in the propensity-matched cohort. Among propensity score-matched groups, the median overall survival was 37.3 (95% CI, 35.2-38.7) months in the PCS group and 32.1 (95% CI, 30.8-34.1) months in the NACT group (P < .001). However, if the NACT group had a higher proportion of women with performance statuses of 1 to 2 compared with those who underwent PCS (60% vs 50%), the association of PCS and improved survival would not be statistically significant.Conclusions and relevancePrimary cytoreductive surgery was associated with improved survival compared with NACT in otherwise healthy women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer aged 70 years or younger. The lower survival in women who received NACT could be explained by a higher prevalence of limited performance status in women undergoing NACT.

Project description:ImportanceHyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) has shown survival benefits for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. However, there is still a lack of consensus regarding the integration of HIPEC into clinical practice.ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ICS with HIPEC compared with ICS alone in clinical practice for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective, multicenter, comparative effectiveness cohort study enrolled 205 patients with stage III or IV ovarian cancer who had received at least 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by ICS with HIPEC or ICS without HIPEC at 7 Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group institutions between September 1, 2017, and April 22, 2022. Nine patients were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria.ExposuresNeoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by ICS with HIPEC or ICS without HIPEC.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) and the safety profile were the key secondary end points.ResultsThis study included 196 patients (median age, 58.0 years [range, 38-82 years]), of whom 109 underwent ICS with HIPEC and 87 underwent ICS without HIPEC. The median duration of follow-up was 28.2 months (range, 3.5-58.6 months). Disease recurrence occurred in 128 patients (65.3%), and 30 patients (15.3%) died. Interval cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC was associated with a significant improvement in median PFS compared with ICS without HIPEC (22.9 months [95% CI, 3.5-58.6 months] vs 14.2 months [95% CI, 4.0-56.2 months]; P = .005) and median OS (not reached [95% CI, 3.5 months to not reached] vs 53.0 [95% CI, 4.6-56.2 months]; P = .002). The frequency of grade 3 or 4 postoperative complications was similar in both groups (ICS with HIPEC, 3 of 109 [2.8%] vs ICS without HIPEC, 3 of 87 [3.4%]; P > .99). Among patients with recurrence, the frequency of peritoneal recurrence was lower in the ICS with HIPEC group than in the ICS without HIPEC group (21 of 64 [32.8%] vs 41 of 64 [64.1%]; P = .001).Conclusions and relevanceThis study suggests that ICS in conjunction with HIPEC was associated with longer PFS and OS than ICS without HIPEC for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer and was not associated with higher rates of postoperative complications. The lower rate of peritoneal recurrence after HIPEC may be associated with improved OS.

Project description:BackgroundEpithelial ovarian cancer presents at an advanced stage in the majority of women. These women require surgery and chemotherapy for optimal treatment. Conventional treatment is to perform surgery first and then give chemotherapy. However, it is not yet clear whether there are any advantages to using chemotherapy before surgery.ObjectivesTo assess whether there is an advantage to treating women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)) compared with conventional treatment where chemotherapy follows maximal cytoreductive surgery.Search methodsFor the original review we searched, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 3, 2006), MEDLINE (Silver Platter, from 1966 to 1 Sept 2006), EMBASE via Ovid (from 1980 to 1 Sept 2006), CANCERLIT (from 1966 to 1 Sept 2006), PDQ (search for open and closed trials) and MetaRegister (most current search Sept 2006). For this update randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 3, 2011) and the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Specialised Register (2011), MEDLINE (August week 1, 2011), EMBASE (to week 31, 2011), PDQ (search for open and closed trials) and MetaRegister (August 2011).Selection criteriaRCTs of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (Federation of International Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) stage III/IV) who were randomly allocated to treatment groups that compared platinum-based chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery with platinum-based chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery.Data collection and analysisData were extracted by two review authors independently, and the quality of included trials was assessed by two review authors independently.Main resultsOne high-quality RCT met the inclusion criteria. This multicentre trial randomised 718 women with stage IIIc/IV ovarian cancer to NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) or primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by chemotherapy. There were no significant differences between the study groups with regard to overall survival (OS) (670 women; HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.18) or progression-free survival (PFS) (670 women; HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.17).Significant differences occurred between the NACT and PDS groups with regard to some surgically related serious adverse effects (SAE grade 3/4) including haemorrhage (12 in NACT group vs 23 in PDS group; RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.99), venous thromboembolism (none in NACT group vs eight in PDS group; RR 0.06; 95% CI 0 to 0.98) and infection (five in NACT group vs 25 in PDS group; RR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.50). Quality of life (QoL) was reported to be similar for the NACT and PDS groups.Three ongoing RCTs were also identified.Authors' conclusionsWe consider the use of NACT in women with stage IIIc/IV ovarian cancer to be a reasonable alternative to PDS, particularly in bulky disease. With regard to selecting who will benefit from NACT, treatment should be tailored to the patient and should take into account resectability, age, histology, stage and performance status. These results cannot be generalised to women with stage IIIa and IIIb ovarian cancer; in these women, PDS is the standard. We await the results of three ongoing trials, which may change these conclusions.

Dataset Information

Prognostic influence of an early time to chemotherapy following primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Prognostic influence of an early time to chemotherapy following primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets